Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay: Comment

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 267-269

  Neill, Helen R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039775950     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135048599353195     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Andersen, D.R., Sweeney, D.J. and Williams, T.A. (1993) Interval Estimation in Statistics for Business and Economics, West Publishing Company, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, pp. 250-83.
2. Cummings, R.G., Elliott, S., Harrison, G.W. and Murphy, J. (1997) Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible? Journal of Political Economy, 105, 609-21.
3. Cummings, R.G., Harrison, G.W. and Rutström E.E. (1995) Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: do dichotomous choice questions elicit real economic commitments? American Economic Review, 85, 260-66.
4. Cummings, R.G. and Taylor, L.O. (1997) Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method, American Economic Review, forthcoming.
5. Johannesson, M., Liljas, B. and Peterson, G. (1997) Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay: some experimental results, Applied Economic Letters, 4, 149-51.
6. Lee C.F. (1993) Numerical Summary Measures in Statistics for Business and Financial Economics, D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA.
7. Loomis, J., Brown, T., Lucero, B. and Peterson, G. (1996) Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay, Land Economics, 72, 450-61.
8. Neill, H.R., Cummings, R.G., Ganderton, P., Harrison, G.W. and McGuckin T. (1994) Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments, Land Economics, 70, 145-54.
9. Smith, V.K. and Mansfield, C. (1996) Buying time: real and hypothetical offers, School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, unpublished manuscript, pp. 1-35.