Comparing power imagery in TATs written by hand or on the computer

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 441-448

  Blankenship, Virginia ^a   Zoota, Andrew L ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039770795     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200677     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ATKINSON, J. W. (Ed.) (1958). Motives in fantasy action and society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
2. ATKINSON, J. W. (1982). Motivation determinants of thematic apperception. In A. J. Stewart (Ed.), Motivation and society (pp. 3-40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. ATKINSON, J. W., & BIRCH, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.
4. ATKINSON, J. W., BONGORT, K., & PRICE L. H. (1977). Explorations using computer stimulation to comprehend TAT measurement of motivation. Motivation & Emotion, 1, 1-27.
5. BANGERT-DROWNS, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 69-93.
6. BROWN, J. S., MCDONALD, J. L., BROWN, T. L., & CARR, T. H. (1988). Adapting to processing demands in discourse production: The case of handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 45-59.
7. DECHARMS, R. (1992). Personal causation and the origin concept. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 325-333). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. ENTWISLE, D. R. (1972). To dispel fantasies about fantasy-based measures of achievement motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 377-391.
9. FINEMAN, S. (1977). The achievement motive construct and its measurement: Where are we now? British Journal of Psychology, 68, 1-22.
10. HAAS, C. (1989). How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word processing on planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 181-207.
11. HABER, R. N., & ALPERT, R. (1958). The role of situation and picture cues in projective measurement of the achievement motive. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action and society (pp. 644-663). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
12. HAWISHER, G. E. (1986). Studies in word processing. Computers & Composition, 4, 6-31.
13. HAWISHER, G. E. (1988). Research update: Writing and word processing. Computers & Composition, 6, 7-27.
14. JENSEN, R. (1959). The reliability of projective techniques: Review of the literature. Acta Psychologica, 16, 108-136.
15. KELLOGG, R. T., & MUELLER, S. (1993). Performance amplification and process restructuring in computer-based writing. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 33-49.
16. MARKUS, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
17. MCCLELLAND, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington Publishers.
18. MCCLELLAND, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
19. MCCLELLAND, D. C., ATKINSON, J. W., CLARK, R. A., & LOWELL, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
20. MCCLELLAND, D. C., KOESTNER, R., & WEINBERGER, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
21. MORGAN, C. D., & MURRAY, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 3-4, 280-306.
22. MURRAY, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. MURSTEIN, B. I. (1965). Reliability. In B. I. Murstein (Ed.), Handbook of projective techniques (pp. 189-218). New York: Basic Books.
24. NICHOLS, R. G. (1986). Word processing and basic writers. Journal of Basic Writing, 5, 81-97.
25. NUNNALLY, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. RINDLER, S. E. (1979). Pitfalls in assessing test speededness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 261-270.
27. ROSENBLUTH, G. S., & REED, W. M. (1992). The effects of writing-process-based instruction and word processing on remedial and accelerated 11th graders. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 71-95.
28. SMITH, C. P. (1992). Reliability issues. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 126-139). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. VANE, J. A. (1981). The Thematic Apperception Test: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 1, 319-336.
30. WEBSTER, J., & COMPEAU, D. (1996). Computer-assisted versus paper-and-pencil administration of questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments. & Computers, 28, 567-576.
31. WINTER, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.
32. WINTER, D. G. (1992). A revised scoring system for the power motive. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 311-324). New York: Cambridge University Press.