Summary of promoting and evaluating effective teaching: American Accounting Association Teaching and Curriculum Section: Promoting and evaluating teaching effectiveness committee

Journal of Accounting Education

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 367-383

  Calderon, Thomas G ^b   Gabbin, Alexander L ^b   Green, Brian Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039767817     PISSN: 07485751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0748-5751(96)00020-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Accounting Education Change Commission (1992). Defining, evaluating and rewarding effective teaching, Proposed Issues Statement, August, Torrance, California.
2. Accounting Education Change Commission (1993). Evaluating and rewarding effective teaching, Issues Statements No. 5, April, Torrance, California.
3. Anderson, E. (Ed.) (1993). Campus use of the teaching portfolio: twenty-five profiles. Washington DC: American Association of Higher Education.
4. Austin, A. W., & Lee, C. B. (1966). Current practices in evaluating and training college teachers. The Educational Record, 47, 361-365.
5. Baker, R. E. (Chair) (1990). Report of the Committee on recognizing, rewarding, and improving teaching effectiveness. Federation of Schools of Accountancy.
6. Calderon, T. G., Green, B. P., & Reider, B. P. (1994). Extent of use of multiple information sources in assessing accounting faculty teaching performance. American Accounting Association-Ohio Regional.
7. Centra, J. A. (1977). Student ratings of instruction and their relationship to student learning. American Education Research Journal, 14, 17-24.
8. Centra, J. A. (1979). Determining faculty effectiveness: assessing teaching research and service for personnel decisions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Courts, R. L., & McInerney, K. H. (1993). Assessment in higher education. Westport, Connecticut: Prager.
11. Frey, P. W. (1973). Student ratings of teaching: validity of several rating factors. Science, 182, 83-85.
12. Kullberg, D. R., Gladstone, W. L., Scanlon, P. R., Cook, J. M., Groves, R. J., Horner, L. D., O'Malley, S. F., & Kangas, E. A. (1989). Perspectives on education: capabilities for success in the accounting profession. New York, NY: Arthur Anderson & Co., Ernst & Whinney, Arthur Young, Peat Marwick Main & Co., Coopers & Lybrand, Price Waterhouse, Deloitte Haskins & Sells, Touche Ross.
13. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluations of university teaching: dimensionality, reliability, and validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707-754.
14. Marsh, H. W. (1991). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: a test of alternative higher-order structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 285-296.
15. Marsh, H. W., & Overall, J. U. (1981). Validity of students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Education Psychology, 72, 468-475.
16. Seldin, P. (1990). Faculty evaluations surveying policy and practices. In Gabbin, A. L., Cairns, S. C., & Benke Jr, R. L. (Eds), Faculty performance appraisal. Center for Research in Accounting Education, James Madison University.
17. Seldin, P. (1993). The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education, July, A40.
18. Yunker, P., & Sterner, J. (1988). A survey of faculty performance evaluation in accounting. The Accounting Educators Journal, 1(2), 63-74 (Fall).