-
1
-
-
0007675168
-
The Supercollider: How Big Science Lost Favor and Fell
-
October 26, which is a journalist's account based mainly upon interviews with key supporters and opponents
-
Several previously published accounts have attempted to provide reasons for the demise of the SSC: G. Taubes, "The Supercollider: How Big Science Lost Favor and Fell," The New York Times, October 26, 1993, pp. B5-10, which is a journalist's account based mainly upon interviews with key supporters and opponents; L. Lederman, "What Can We Learn from the Super Collider's Demise?" The Scientist (November 29, 1993), 12; D. Ritson, "Demise of the Texas Supercollider," Nature 366 (December 26, 1993), 607-610, which tells the story of the SSC largely from the viewpoint of a physicist directly involved in the project; W. K. H. Panofsky, "The SSC's End. What Happened? And What Now?" Physics Today 47 (March 1994), 13-15, which assails micromanagement of the project by the Department of Energy; and D. J. Kevles, "The Death of the Superconducting Super Collider in the Life of American Physics," preface to the 2nd edition of The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), pp. ix-xlii, which focuses on political aspects of the project, particularly events in Congress. For a Congressional viewpoint, see the report by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, Out of Control: Lessons Learned from the Superconducting Super Collider (Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, December 1994).
-
(1993)
The New York Times
-
-
Taubes, G.1
-
2
-
-
0346449459
-
What Can We Learn from the Super Collider's Demise?
-
November 29
-
Several previously published accounts have attempted to provide reasons for the demise of the SSC: G. Taubes, "The Supercollider: How Big Science Lost Favor and Fell," The New York Times, October 26, 1993, pp. B5-10, which is a journalist's account based mainly upon interviews with key supporters and opponents; L. Lederman, "What Can We Learn from the Super Collider's Demise?" The Scientist (November 29, 1993), 12; D. Ritson, "Demise of the Texas Supercollider," Nature 366 (December 26, 1993), 607-610, which tells the story of the SSC largely from the viewpoint of a physicist directly involved in the project; W. K. H. Panofsky, "The SSC's End. What Happened? And What Now?" Physics Today 47 (March 1994), 13-15, which assails micromanagement of the project by the Department of Energy; and D. J. Kevles, "The Death of the Superconducting Super Collider in the Life of American Physics," preface to the 2nd edition of The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), pp. ix-xlii, which focuses on political aspects of the project, particularly events in Congress. For a Congressional viewpoint, see the report by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, Out of Control: Lessons Learned from the Superconducting Super Collider (Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, December 1994).
-
(1993)
The Scientist
, pp. 12
-
-
Lederman, L.1
-
3
-
-
0027753028
-
Demise of the Texas Supercollider
-
December 26, which tells the story of the SSC largely from the viewpoint of a physicist directly involved in the project
-
Several previously published accounts have attempted to provide reasons for the demise of the SSC: G. Taubes, "The Supercollider: How Big Science Lost Favor and Fell," The New York Times, October 26, 1993, pp. B5-10, which is a journalist's account based mainly upon interviews with key supporters and opponents; L. Lederman, "What Can We Learn from the Super Collider's Demise?" The Scientist (November 29, 1993), 12; D. Ritson, "Demise of the Texas Supercollider," Nature 366 (December 26, 1993), 607-610, which tells the story of the SSC largely from the viewpoint of a physicist directly involved in the project; W. K. H. Panofsky, "The SSC's End. What Happened? And What Now?" Physics Today 47 (March 1994), 13-15, which assails micromanagement of the project by the Department of Energy; and D. J. Kevles, "The Death of the Superconducting Super Collider in the Life of American Physics," preface to the 2nd edition of The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), pp. ix-xlii, which focuses on political aspects of the project, particularly events in Congress. For a Congressional viewpoint, see the report by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, Out of Control: Lessons Learned from the Superconducting Super Collider (Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, December 1994).
-
(1993)
Nature
, vol.366
, pp. 607-610
-
-
Ritson, D.1
-
4
-
-
0011052390
-
The SSC's End. What Happened? And What Now?
-
March which assails micromanagement of the project by the Department of Energy
-
Several previously published accounts have attempted to provide reasons for the demise of the SSC: G. Taubes, "The Supercollider: How Big Science Lost Favor and Fell," The New York Times, October 26, 1993, pp. B5-10, which is a journalist's account based mainly upon interviews with key supporters and opponents; L. Lederman, "What Can We Learn from the Super Collider's Demise?" The Scientist (November 29, 1993), 12; D. Ritson, "Demise of the Texas Supercollider," Nature 366 (December 26, 1993), 607-610, which tells the story of the SSC largely from the viewpoint of a physicist directly involved in the project; W. K. H. Panofsky, "The SSC's End. What Happened? And What Now?" Physics Today 47 (March 1994), 13-15, which assails micromanagement of the project by the Department of Energy; and D. J. Kevles, "The Death of the Superconducting Super Collider in the Life of American Physics," preface to the 2nd edition of The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), pp. ix-xlii, which focuses on political aspects of the project, particularly events in Congress. For a Congressional viewpoint, see the report by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, Out of Control: Lessons Learned from the Superconducting Super Collider (Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, December 1994).
-
(1994)
Physics Today
, vol.47
, pp. 13-15
-
-
Panofsky, W.K.H.1
-
5
-
-
33745992920
-
The Death of the Superconducting Super Collider in the Life of American Physics
-
preface to the 2nd edition of Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, which focuses on political aspects of the project, particularly events in Congress
-
Several previously published accounts have attempted to provide reasons for the demise of the SSC: G. Taubes, "The Supercollider: How Big Science Lost Favor and Fell," The New York Times, October 26, 1993, pp. B5-10, which is a journalist's account based mainly upon interviews with key supporters and opponents; L. Lederman, "What Can We Learn from the Super Collider's Demise?" The Scientist (November 29, 1993), 12; D. Ritson, "Demise of the Texas Supercollider," Nature 366 (December 26, 1993), 607-610, which tells the story of the SSC largely from the viewpoint of a physicist directly involved in the project; W. K. H. Panofsky, "The SSC's End. What Happened? And What Now?" Physics Today 47 (March 1994), 13-15, which assails micromanagement of the project by the Department of Energy; and D. J. Kevles, "The Death of the Superconducting Super Collider in the Life of American Physics," preface to the 2nd edition of The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), pp. ix-xlii, which focuses on political aspects of the project, particularly events in Congress. For a Congressional viewpoint, see the report by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, Out of Control: Lessons Learned from the Superconducting Super Collider (Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, December 1994).
-
(1997)
The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America
-
-
Kevles, D.J.1
-
6
-
-
0347709992
-
-
Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, December
-
Several previously published accounts have attempted to provide reasons for the demise of the SSC: G. Taubes, "The Supercollider: How Big Science Lost Favor and Fell," The New York Times, October 26, 1993, pp. B5-10, which is a journalist's account based mainly upon interviews with key supporters and opponents; L. Lederman, "What Can We Learn from the Super Collider's Demise?" The Scientist (November 29, 1993), 12; D. Ritson, "Demise of the Texas Supercollider," Nature 366 (December 26, 1993), 607-610, which tells the story of the SSC largely from the viewpoint of a physicist directly involved in the project; W. K. H. Panofsky, "The SSC's End. What Happened? And What Now?" Physics Today 47 (March 1994), 13-15, which assails micromanagement of the project by the Department of Energy; and D. J. Kevles, "The Death of the Superconducting Super Collider in the Life of American Physics," preface to the 2nd edition of The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), pp. ix-xlii, which focuses on political aspects of the project, particularly events in Congress. For a Congressional viewpoint, see the report by the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, Out of Control: Lessons Learned from the Superconducting Super Collider (Washington, U.S. Government Printing Office, December 1994).
-
(1994)
Out of Control: Lessons Learned from the Superconducting Super Collider
-
-
-
7
-
-
0040343947
-
The First Large-Scale Application of Superconductivity: The Fermilab Energy Doubler, 1972-83
-
On the development of superconducting magnet technology at Fermilab, see L. Hoddeson, "The First Large-Scale Application of Superconductivity: The Fermilab Energy Doubler, 1972-83," Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 18 (1987), 25-54.
-
(1987)
Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences
, vol.18
, pp. 25-54
-
-
Hoddeson, L.1
-
8
-
-
0003958590
-
-
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
-
On the establishment of the Standard Model as the dominant theory of particle physics, see A. Pickering, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1984); and Lillian Hoddeson, Laurie Brown, Michael Riordan, and Max Dresden, ed., The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 1970s (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), especially the introductory survey article by Laurie Brown, Michael Riordan, Max Dresden and Lillian Hoddeson, "The Rise of the Standard Model: 1964-79," pp. 3-35.
-
(1984)
Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics
-
-
Pickering, A.1
-
9
-
-
0004240473
-
-
New York: Cambridge University Press
-
On the establishment of the Standard Model as the dominant theory of particle physics, see A. Pickering, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1984); and Lillian Hoddeson, Laurie Brown, Michael Riordan, and Max Dresden, ed., The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 1970s (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), especially the introductory survey article by Laurie Brown, Michael Riordan, Max Dresden and Lillian Hoddeson, "The Rise of the Standard Model: 1964-79," pp. 3-35.
-
(1997)
The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 1970s
-
-
Hoddeson, L.1
Brown, L.2
Riordan, M.3
Dresden, M.4
-
10
-
-
0004240473
-
-
On the establishment of the Standard Model as the dominant theory of particle physics, see A. Pickering, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1984); and Lillian Hoddeson, Laurie Brown, Michael Riordan, and Max Dresden, ed., The Rise of the Standard Model: Particle Physics in the 1960s and 1970s (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), especially the introductory survey article by Laurie Brown, Michael Riordan, Max Dresden and Lillian Hoddeson, "The Rise of the Standard Model: 1964-79," pp. 3-35.
-
The Rise of the Standard Model: 1964-79
, pp. 3-35
-
-
Brown, L.1
Riordan, M.2
Dresden, M.3
Hoddeson, L.4
-
11
-
-
0345818235
-
The Summer of Discontent: Snowmass, 1982
-
Riordan et al., to appear
-
M. Riordan, "The Summer of Discontent: Snowmass, 1982," in Riordan et al., Tunnel Visions (to appear).
-
Tunnel Visions
-
-
Riordan, M.1
-
12
-
-
0345818235
-
The Summer of Discontent: Snowmass, 1982
-
Ibid. See also R. Diebold et al., "'Conventional' 20-TeV, 10-Tesla, p±p Colliders," in R. Donaldson, R. Gustafson and F. Paige, eds., Proceedings of the 1982 DPF Summer Study on Elementary Particle Physics and Future Facilities, June 28-July 16, 1982, Snowmass, CO (Batavia, IL: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, 1983), pp. 307-314; and R. Huson et al, "20-TeV Colliding Beam Facilities: New, Low-Cost Approaches," ibid., pp. 315-321.
-
Tunnel Visions
-
-
Riordan, M.1
-
13
-
-
0345818230
-
'Conventional' 20-TeV, 10-Tesla, p±p Colliders
-
R. Donaldson, R. Gustafson and F. Paige, eds., June 28-July 16, 1982, Snowmass, CO Batavia, IL: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
-
Ibid. See also R. Diebold et al., "'Conventional' 20-TeV, 10-Tesla, p±p Colliders," in R. Donaldson, R. Gustafson and F. Paige, eds., Proceedings of the 1982 DPF Summer Study on Elementary Particle Physics and Future Facilities, June 28-July 16, 1982, Snowmass, CO (Batavia, IL: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, 1983), pp. 307-314; and R. Huson et al, "20-TeV Colliding Beam Facilities: New, Low-Cost Approaches," ibid., pp. 315-321.
-
(1983)
Proceedings of the 1982 DPF Summer Study on Elementary Particle Physics and Future Facilities
, pp. 307-314
-
-
Diebold, R.1
-
14
-
-
0347079676
-
20-TeV Colliding Beam Facilities: New, Low-Cost Approaches
-
June 28-July 16, 1982, Snowmass, CO Batavia, IL: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
-
Ibid. See also R. Diebold et al., "'Conventional' 20-TeV, 10-Tesla, p±p Colliders," in R. Donaldson, R. Gustafson and F. Paige, eds., Proceedings of the 1982 DPF Summer Study on Elementary Particle Physics and Future Facilities, June 28-July 16, 1982, Snowmass, CO (Batavia, IL: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, 1983), pp. 307-314; and R. Huson et al, "20-TeV Colliding Beam Facilities: New, Low-Cost Approaches," ibid., pp. 315-321.
-
Proceedings of the 1982 DPF Summer Study on Elementary Particle Physics and Future Facilities
, pp. 315-321
-
-
Huson, R.1
-
15
-
-
84968126485
-
The Mirage of the World Accelerator for World Peace and the Origins of the SSC
-
A. Kolb and L. Hoddeson, "The Mirage of the World Accelerator for World Peace and the Origins of the SSC," Historical Studies in the Physicsal and Biological Sciences 24 (1993), 101-124; "The World Accelerator and the Desertron, 1953-83," in Riordan et al., Tunnel Visions (to appear).
-
(1993)
Historical Studies in the Physicsal and Biological Sciences
, vol.24
, pp. 101-124
-
-
Kolb, A.1
Hoddeson, L.2
-
16
-
-
84968126485
-
The World Accelerator and the Desertron, 1953-83
-
to appear
-
A. Kolb and L. Hoddeson, "The Mirage of the World Accelerator for World Peace and the Origins of the SSC," Historical Studies in the Physicsal and Biological Sciences 24 (1993), 101-124; "The World Accelerator and the Desertron, 1953-83," in Riordan et al., Tunnel Visions (to appear).
-
Tunnel Visions
-
-
Riordan1
-
17
-
-
0347079660
-
The World Accelerator and the Desertron, 1953-83
-
Ibid., and Riordan, "The Summer of Discontent"; N. Douglas Pewitt, oral history interview by M. Riordan; George Keyworth, oral history interview by L. Hoddeson.
-
Tunnel Visions
-
-
Riordan1
-
18
-
-
85040797479
-
-
N. Douglas Pewitt, oral history interview by M. Riordan; George Keyworth, oral history interview by L. Hoddeson
-
Ibid., and Riordan, "The Summer of Discontent"; N. Douglas Pewitt, oral history interview by M. Riordan; George Keyworth, oral history interview by L. Hoddeson.
-
The Summer of Discontent
-
-
Riordan1
-
19
-
-
0347079661
-
Magnet Failures Imperil New Accelerator
-
November 21
-
On the problems of Isabelle, see W. J. Broad, "Magnet Failures Imperil New Accelerator," Science 210 (November 21, 1980), 875-878; and "Accelerator Superconducting Magnets Give Headaches," Physics Today 34 (April 1981), 17-20.
-
(1980)
Science
, vol.210
, pp. 875-878
-
-
Broad, W.J.1
-
20
-
-
84916756055
-
Accelerator Superconducting Magnets Give Headaches
-
April
-
On the problems of Isabelle, see W. J. Broad, "Magnet Failures Imperil New Accelerator," Science 210 (November 21, 1980), 875-878; and "Accelerator Superconducting Magnets Give Headaches," Physics Today 34 (April 1981), 17-20.
-
(1981)
Physics Today
, vol.34
, pp. 17-20
-
-
-
21
-
-
0347709990
-
The SSC's Frontier Outpost: The Central Design Group, 1983-88
-
Riordan et al., to appear
-
SSC Central Design Group, "Conceptual Design Report of the Superconducting Super Collider, Report No. SSC-SR-2020 (Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, March 1986). See also L. Hoddeson and A. Kolb, "The SSC's Frontier Outpost: The Central Design Group, 1983-88," in Riordan et al., Tunnel Visions (to appear).
-
Tunnel Visions
-
-
Hoddeson, L.1
Kolb, A.2
-
22
-
-
0346449454
-
Reagan Endorses the SSC, a Colossus among Colliders
-
March
-
I. Goodwin, "Reagan Endorses the SSC, a Colossus among Colliders," Physics Today 40 (March 1987), 48-49.
-
(1987)
Physics Today
, vol.40
, pp. 48-49
-
-
Goodwin, I.1
-
23
-
-
84953678922
-
DOE Picks Texas for 'Gippertron' amid Political and Managerial Collisions
-
February
-
I. Goodwin, "DOE Picks Texas for 'Gippertron' amid Political and Managerial Collisions," Physics Today 42 (February 1989), 96; G. Sandiford, "Reason and Rationality in the SSC Site Selection, 1987-88," in Riordan et al., Tunnel Visions (to appear).
-
(1989)
Physics Today
, vol.42
, pp. 96
-
-
Goodwin, I.1
-
24
-
-
84953678922
-
Reason and Rationality in the SSC Site Selection, 1987-88
-
Riordan et al., to appear
-
I. Goodwin, "DOE Picks Texas for 'Gippertron' amid Political and Managerial Collisions," Physics Today 42 (February 1989), 96; G. Sandiford, "Reason and Rationality in the SSC Site Selection, 1987-88," in Riordan et al., Tunnel Visions (to appear).
-
Tunnel Visions
-
-
Sandiford, G.1
-
25
-
-
0345818224
-
House Approves SSC Construction
-
July 7, As opposed to earlier estimates, this figure included the impact of inflation during construction
-
M. Crawford, "House Approves SSC Construction," Science 245 (July 7, 1989), 25-27. As opposed to earlier estimates, this figure included the impact of inflation during construction.
-
(1989)
Science
, vol.245
, pp. 25-27
-
-
Crawford, M.1
-
26
-
-
0025864959
-
The SSC Gets Its (Official) Price Tag: S8.3 Billion
-
February 15
-
D. Hamilton, "The SSC Gets Its (Official) Price Tag: S8.3 Billion," Science 251 (February 15, 1991), 741.
-
(1991)
Science
, vol.251
, pp. 741
-
-
Hamilton, D.1
-
27
-
-
0039751967
-
Senate Endorses Further Spending on Supercollider
-
August 4
-
C. Krauss, "Senate Endorses Further Spending on Supercollider," New York Times (August 4, 1992), p. 1; D. Hamilton, "Senate Issues a Stay of Execution," Science 257 (August 7, 1992), 737. The vote was 62-32 against an amendment offered by Senator Dale Bumpers to terminate the SSC.
-
(1992)
New York Times
, pp. 1
-
-
Krauss, C.1
-
28
-
-
0027114211
-
Senate Issues a Stay of Execution
-
August 7, The vote was 62-32 against an amendment offered by Senator Dale Bumpers to terminate the SSC
-
C. Krauss, "Senate Endorses Further Spending on Supercollider," New York Times (August 4, 1992), p. 1; D. Hamilton, "Senate Issues a Stay of Execution," Science 257 (August 7, 1992), 737. The vote was 62-32 against an amendment offered by Senator Dale Bumpers to terminate the SSC.
-
(1992)
Science
, vol.257
, pp. 737
-
-
Hamilton, D.1
-
29
-
-
0347079682
-
-
oral history interview with M. Riordan
-
J. Bennett Johnston and Proctor Jones, oral history interview with M. Riordan.
-
-
-
Bennett Johnston, J.1
Jones, P.2
-
30
-
-
0040344101
-
SSC Falls victim to Congressional Austerity
-
July 1, The new Representatives voted 83 to 31 against the SSC
-
C. Macilwain, "SSC Falls victim to Congressional Austerity," Nature 364 (July 1, 1993), 6. The new Representatives voted 83 to 31 against the SSC.
-
(1993)
Nature
, vol.364
, pp. 6
-
-
Macilwain, C.1
-
31
-
-
84901901666
-
House Votes to Kill Supercollider in What Looks Like Final Defeat
-
October 20
-
M. Wines, "House Votes to Kill Supercollider in What Looks Like Final Defeat," New York Times, October 20, 1993, p. 1.
-
(1993)
New York Times
, pp. 1
-
-
Wines, M.1
-
33
-
-
0347079656
-
-
Report No. GAO/RCED-93-87 Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, February
-
U.S. General Accounting Office, "Federal Research: Super Collider is Over Budget and Behind Schedule," Report No. GAO/RCED-93-87 (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1993). Energy Department officials attempted to rebut this report in a February 24, 1993, letter from Secretary Hazel O'Leary to House Science Committee Chairman George E. Brown, Jr. (from files of Science Committee staffer Robert Palmer). The extent of public and media confusion on this issue can be grasped from reading C. Anderson, "University Consortium Faulted on Management, Accounting," Science 261 (July 9, 1993), 157, and C. Macilwain, "Barrage of Mud Fails to Stick on Sinking Super Collider, Nature 364 (July 8, 1993), 92. Discussions with John Toll, oral history interview with M. Riordan and S. Weiss, were also helpful.
-
(1993)
Federal Research: Super Collider is over Budget and behind Schedule
-
-
-
34
-
-
0007657217
-
University Consortium Faulted on Management, Accounting
-
July 9
-
U.S. General Accounting Office, "Federal Research: Super Collider is Over Budget and Behind Schedule," Report No. GAO/RCED-93-87 (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1993). Energy Department officials attempted to rebut this report in a February 24, 1993, letter from Secretary Hazel O'Leary to House Science Committee Chairman George E. Brown, Jr. (from files of Science Committee staffer Robert Palmer). The extent of public and media confusion on this issue can be grasped from reading C. Anderson, "University Consortium Faulted on Management, Accounting," Science 261 (July 9, 1993), 157, and C. Macilwain, "Barrage of Mud Fails to Stick on Sinking Super Collider, Nature 364 (July 8, 1993), 92. Discussions with John Toll, oral history interview with M. Riordan and S. Weiss, were also helpful.
-
(1993)
Science
, vol.261
, pp. 157
-
-
Anderson, C.1
-
35
-
-
0039751972
-
Barrage of Mud Fails to Stick on Sinking Super Collider
-
July 8, Discussions with John Toll, oral history interview with M. Riordan and S. Weiss, were also helpful
-
U.S. General Accounting Office, "Federal Research: Super Collider is Over Budget and Behind Schedule," Report No. GAO/RCED-93-87 (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1993). Energy Department officials attempted to rebut this report in a February 24, 1993, letter from Secretary Hazel O'Leary to House Science Committee Chairman George E. Brown, Jr. (from files of Science Committee staffer Robert Palmer). The extent of public and media confusion on this issue can be grasped from reading C. Anderson, "University Consortium Faulted on Management, Accounting," Science 261 (July 9, 1993), 157, and C. Macilwain, "Barrage of Mud Fails to Stick on Sinking Super Collider, Nature 364 (July 8, 1993), 92. Discussions with John Toll, oral history interview with M. Riordan and S. Weiss, were also helpful.
-
(1993)
Nature
, vol.364
, pp. 92
-
-
Macilwain, C.1
-
37
-
-
84883118856
-
-
See, for example, S. LaFraniere, Washington Posts Super Collider Mired in Murky Cost Equations, September 6, 1993, p. A1 and G. Taubes, "The Supercollider."
-
The Supercollider
-
-
Taubes, G.1
-
38
-
-
0346449453
-
-
oral history interview with M. Riordan and S. Weiss
-
James D. Watkins, oral history interview with M. Riordan and S. Weiss.
-
-
-
Watkins, J.D.1
-
39
-
-
0346449458
-
-
oral history interview with M. Riordan and S. Weiss
-
Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky, oral history interview with M. Riordan and S. Weiss.
-
-
-
Panofsky, W.K.H.1
-
40
-
-
84883118856
-
-
and private communications
-
Taubes, "The Supercollider," p. B10, and private communications.
-
The Supercollider
-
-
Taubes1
-
42
-
-
0347079674
-
-
private communications with M. Riordan
-
Burton Richter and Kasuke Takahashi, private communications with M. Riordan.
-
-
-
Richter, B.1
Takahashi, K.2
-
43
-
-
0346449448
-
-
(to appear) for more detail on these developments
-
The roots of this one-third non-federal requirement extend further back in history, to the Reagan Administration, in which the Office of Management and Budget was initially opposed to the SSC and suggested that such a level of outside contributions would be necessary. See Weiss, Colliding Fields (to appear) for more detail on these developments.
-
Colliding Fields
-
-
Weiss1
-
44
-
-
0347709993
-
The Politics of Big Science: Washington and the World, 1989-93
-
Riordan et al., to appear
-
An analysis of the 1992 House vote reveals that it fell not along party lines but largely along Rust Belt versus Sun Belt lines, with large majorities in Illinois, Michigan and New York voting to kill the SSC, while Texas and other southern states were solidly behind it. Note that Illinois is home to Fermilab, whose budget was among those being threatened by the growth of the SSC's; in 1992 the Illinois delegation voted 18-2 to kill the SSC, with two abstentions (versus 12-9-1 in 1991). California, in which the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and Stanford Linear Accelerator Center are located, had supported the SSC much more strongly - by almost a 3 to 1 margin - in the 1991 vote than in 1992. See M. Riordan, "The Politics of Big Science: Washington and the World, 1989-93," in Riordan et al., Tunnel Visions (to appear).
-
Tunnel Visions
-
-
Riordan, M.1
-
45
-
-
84857735345
-
-
17 June
-
Congressional Record, Vol. 138, No. 87 (17 June 1992), p. H4829.
-
(1992)
Congressional Record
, vol.138
, Issue.87
-
-
-
46
-
-
0348149997
-
Clinton Backs SSC, Space Station
-
June 25
-
E. Marshall, "Clinton Backs SSC, Space Station," Science 260 (June 25, 1993), 1873.
-
(1993)
Science
, vol.260
, pp. 1873
-
-
Marshall, E.1
-
47
-
-
0345818226
-
Amazing Race: The SSC Contest Generates Disorder and Discord
-
May
-
I. Goodwin, "Amazing Race: The SSC Contest Generates Disorder and Discord," Physics Today 41 (May 1988), 69. The Nobel laureates opposed to the project included Philip Anderson, Nicholas Bloembergen, and J. Robert Schrieffer; the former APS President is James Krumhansl. Whether there was significant impact of the SSC upon funding of other fields of physics is open to debate; within fields funded by the Department of Energy, however, the threat of such an impact was real. See, for example, R. Pool, "Department of Energy Faces Hard Choices," Nature 353 (September 26, 1991), 287.
-
(1988)
Physics Today
, vol.41
, pp. 69
-
-
Goodwin, I.1
-
48
-
-
0345818226
-
Department of Energy Faces Hard Choices
-
September 26
-
I. Goodwin, "Amazing Race: The SSC Contest Generates Disorder and Discord," Physics Today 41 (May 1988), 69. The Nobel laureates opposed to the project included Philip Anderson, Nicholas Bloembergen, and J. Robert Schrieffer; the former APS President is James Krumhansl. Whether there was significant impact of the SSC upon funding of other fields of physics is open to debate; within fields funded by the Department of Energy, however, the threat of such an impact was real. See, for example, R. Pool, "Department of Energy Faces Hard Choices," Nature 353 (September 26, 1991), 287.
-
(1991)
Nature
, vol.353
, pp. 287
-
-
Pool, R.1
-
49
-
-
85085718251
-
-
quote on
-
1," quote on p. xxxviii.
-
1
-
-
-
52
-
-
0347079669
-
-
oral history interview by S. Weiss
-
Alvin Trivelpiece, oral history interview by S. Weiss.
-
-
-
Trivelpiece, A.1
-
53
-
-
85045228891
-
Basic Research Revisited
-
May 20
-
"Basic Research Revisited," Nature 363 (May 20, 1993), 194.
-
(1993)
Nature
, vol.363
, pp. 194
-
-
-
54
-
-
0347079655
-
Space Station Survives Another Vote
-
July 2
-
R. Stone, "Space Station Survives Another Vote," Science 261 (July 2, 1993), 19.
-
(1993)
Science
, vol.261
, pp. 19
-
-
Stone, R.1
-
55
-
-
0347079655
-
Space Station Survives Another Vote
-
On the precarious state of Space Station in June 1993, see ibid., Marshall, "Clinton Backs SSC, Space Station," and "The Cold War's Unwanted Monument," Nature 363 (June 17, 1993), 567.
-
(1993)
Science
, vol.261
, pp. 19
-
-
Stone, R.1
-
56
-
-
0347079668
-
-
On the precarious state of Space Station in June 1993, see ibid., Marshall, "Clinton Backs SSC, Space Station," and "The Cold War's Unwanted Monument," Nature 363 (June 17, 1993), 567.
-
Clinton Backs SSC, Space Station
-
-
Marshall1
-
57
-
-
85045229557
-
The Cold War's Unwanted Monument
-
June 17
-
On the precarious state of Space Station in June 1993, see ibid., Marshall, "Clinton Backs SSC, Space Station," and "The Cold War's Unwanted Monument," Nature 363 (June 17, 1993), 567.
-
(1993)
Nature
, vol.363
, pp. 567
-
-
-
58
-
-
25744441014
-
Resuming the Pursuit of Knowledge
-
21 November
-
H. R. O'Leary and G. E. Brown, Jr., "Resuming the Pursuit of Knowledge," The Los Angeles Times (21 November 1993), p. M5. See also G. E. Brown, Jr., "Big Science and International Cooperation," SLAC Beam Line 24 (Spring 1994), 3-11.
-
(1993)
The Los Angeles Times
-
-
O'Leary, H.R.1
Brown Jr., G.E.2
-
59
-
-
0345982446
-
Big Science and International Cooperation
-
Spring
-
H. R. O'Leary and G. E. Brown, Jr., "Resuming the Pursuit of Knowledge," The Los Angeles Times (21 November 1993), p. M5. See also G. E. Brown, Jr., "Big Science and International Cooperation," SLAC Beam Line 24 (Spring 1994), 3-11.
-
(1994)
SLAC Beam Line
, vol.24
, pp. 3-11
-
-
Brown Jr., G.E.1
-
60
-
-
25744480264
-
Panel Urges U.S. to Join European Collider Project
-
May 31
-
W. Sullivan, "Panel Urges U.S. to Join European Collider Project," New York Times (May 31, 1994), p. B8; F. Flam, "Panel Presents Vision for Physics After the Supercollider," Science 264 (June 3, 1994), 1397.
-
(1994)
New York Times
-
-
Sullivan, W.1
-
61
-
-
0028239312
-
Panel Presents Vision for Physics after the Supercollider
-
June 3
-
W. Sullivan, "Panel Urges U.S. to Join European Collider Project," New York Times (May 31, 1994), p. B8; F. Flam, "Panel Presents Vision for Physics After the Supercollider," Science 264 (June 3, 1994), 1397.
-
(1994)
Science
, vol.264
, pp. 1397
-
-
Flam, F.1
-
62
-
-
0031471238
-
CERN deal 'historic and path-breaking'
-
December 1
-
C. Macilwain, "CERN deal 'historic and path-breaking'," Nature 390 (December 1, 1997), 545.
-
(1997)
Nature
, vol.390
, pp. 545
-
-
Macilwain, C.1
-
63
-
-
0028362344
-
Competition Looms for a Linear Collider
-
June 3
-
F. Flam, "Competition Looms for a Linear Collider," Science 264 (June 3, 1994), 1397; G. Loew and M. Riordan, "International Collaboration on Linear Collider Research and Development," SLAC Beam Line 27 (Winter 1997), 35-40
-
(1994)
Science
, vol.264
, pp. 1397
-
-
Flam, F.1
-
64
-
-
0347243375
-
International Collaboration on Linear Collider Research and Development
-
Winter
-
F. Flam, "Competition Looms for a Linear Collider," Science 264 (June 3, 1994), 1397; G. Loew and M. Riordan, "International Collaboration on Linear Collider Research and Development," SLAC Beam Line 27 (Winter 1997), 35-40
-
(1997)
SLAC Beam Line
, vol.27
, pp. 35-40
-
-
Loew, G.1
Riordan, M.2
|