The auditor's objectivity under a negligence liability system

Auditing

Volumn 18, Issue SUPPL., 1999, Pages 136-165

  Boritz, J Efrim ^a   Zhang, Ping ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039700412     PISSN: 02780380     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Antle, R. 1984. Auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 304-330.
2. _, and B. Nalebuff. 1991. Conservatism and auditor-client negotiations. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement): 31-54.
3. Beattie, V., R. Brandt, and S. Fearnley. 1998. Behind the audit report: A descriptive study of interaction between auditors and directors. Manuscript, University of Stirling, U.K.
4. Boritz, J. E., and P. Zhang. 1997. The implications of alternative litigation cost allocation systems for the value of audits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 12 (4): 353-372.
5. Braun, K. W. 1998. The disposition of audit-detected misstatements: An examination of risk and reward factors and aggregation effects. Proceedings of the 13th Contemporary Accounting Research Conference, Vancouver, Canada, October 31.
6. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Handbook. 1999. Toronto, Canada: CICA.
7. Chow, C. W., and S. J. Rice. 1982. Qualified audit opinions and auditor switching. The Accounting Review 57 (April): 326-335.
8. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor independence, " low balling." and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3: 113-127.
9. DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors. The Accounting Review (July): 643-655.
10. Gibbins, M., S. Salterio, and A. Webb. 1999. Evidence about auditor-client management negotiation concerning client's financial reporting. Manuscript, University of Waterloo.
11. Goldman A., and B. Barlev. 1974. The auditor-firm conflict of interests: Its implications for independence. The Accounting Review (October): 707-718.
12. Icerman, R. C., and W. A. Hillison. 1991. Disposition of audit-detected errors: Some evidence on evaluative materiality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Spring): 22-34.
13. Kinney, W. R. 1975. A decision-theory approach to the sampling problem in auditing. Journal of Accounting Research. (Spring): 117-132.
14. Mutchler, J., J. E. Boritz, S. Chang, J. Francis, S. Maijoor, L. McDaniel, D. Prawitt, A. Schilder, J. Tsui, M. Vasarhelyi, G. Vinten, and R. Whittington. 1999. Managed Objectivity: A New Paradigm for Internal Audit Independence. Altamonte Springs, FL: Institute of Internal Auditors.
15. Penno, M. 1996. Unobservable precision choices in financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research. (Spring): 141-149.
16. Schwartz, R. 1997. Legal regimes, audit quality and investment. The Accounting Review 72 (3): 385-406.
17. _. 1998. Auditors' legal liability, vague due care and auditing standards. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 11 (2): 183-207.
18. Scott, W. R. 1973. A Bayesian approach to asset valuation and audit size. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 304-330.
19. Titman, S., and B. Trueman. 1986. Information quality and the valuation of new issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics (8): 159.
20. Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1990. Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. The Accounting Review (January): 131-156.
21. Wright, A., and S. Wright. 1997. An examination of factors affecting the decision to waive audit adjustments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance (Winter): 15-36.
22. Zhang, P. 1999. A bargaining model of auditor reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research. (Spring): 167-184.