A survey regarding the university of north dakota institutional review board: Data, attitudes, and perceptions

Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

Volumn 133, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 272-280

  Ferraro, F Richard ^a   Szigeti, Elvira ^a   Dawes, Kenneth J ^a   Pan, Shihua ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039627975     PISSN: 00223980     EISSN: 19401019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223989909599740     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Annas, G. J., & Grodin, M. A. (1992). The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1989). Principles of biomedical ethics (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Beecher, H. K. (1966). Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 274, 1354-1360.
4. Fried, C. (1974). Medical experimentation: Personal integrity and social policy. New York: Elsevier.
5. Levine, R. J. (1986). Ethics and regulation of clinical research (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
6. Lo, B. (1991). Behind closed doors: Promises and pitfalls of ethics committees. In T. A. Mappes & J. S. Zembaty (Eds.), Biomedical ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Maloney, D. M. (1984). Protection of human research subjects: A practical guide to federal laws and regulations. New York: Plenum Press.
8. Martin, D. K., Meslin, E. M., Kohut, N., & Singer, P. A. (1995). Guidelines for authors. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 17, 8-10.
9. Rothman, D. J. (1991). Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York: Basic Books.
10. Sieber, J. E. (1992). Planning ethically responsible research: A guide for students and internal review boards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. University of North Dakota IRB Manual. (1996). Grand Forks, ND: Author.