The case against statistical significance testing, revisited

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 1993, Pages 287-292

  Carver, Ronald P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039625885     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1993.10806591     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
2. Carver, R. P. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287-292.
3. Dar, R. (1987). Another look at Meehl, Lakatos, and the scientific practices of psychologists. American Psychologist, 42, 145-151.
4. Huberty, C. J (1993). Historical origins of statistical testing practices: The treatment of Fisher versus Neyman-Pearson views in textbooks. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 317-333.
5. Levin, J. R. (1975). Determining sample size for planned and post hoc analysis of variance comparisons. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 99-108.
6. Levin, J. R, (1985). Some methodological and Statistical ”bugs” in research on children”s learning. In M. Pressley & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children (pp. 205-233). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Levin, J. R. (1991). Editorial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 5-7.
8. Levin, J. R. (1992). Editorial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 3-5.
9. Levin, J. R., & Marshall, H. H. (1993). Publishing in the Journal of Educational Psychology. Reflections at midstream. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 3-6.
10. Levin, J. R., Serlin, R. C., & Seaman, M. A. (in press). A controlled, powerful multiple-comparison strategy for several situations. Psychological Bulletin.
11. Seaman, M. A., Levin, J. R., & Serlin, R. C. (1991). New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practicable procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 577-586.
12. Serlin, R. C. (1993). Confidence intervals and the scientific method: A case for Holm on the range. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 350-360.
13. Shaver, J. P. (1993). What significance testing is, and what it is not. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 293-316.
14. Snyder, P., & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating! results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 334-349.
15. Thompson, B. (1993). The use of statistical significance tests in research. Bootstrap and other alternatives. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 361-377.