Exploring the Technical Adequacy of Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading for Children Who Use Manually Coded English

Exceptional Children

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 271-283

  Allinder, Rose M ^a   Eccarius, Malinda A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039621515     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440299906500210     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allen, T. E. (1986). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974-1983. In A.N. Shildroth & M.A. Karchmer (Eds.), Deaf children in America (pp. 161-206). San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.*
2. Allinder, R. M. (1996). When some is not better than none: Effects of differential implementation of curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 62, 525-536.
3. Bain, S. K., & Garlock, J. W. (1992). Cross-validation of criterion-related validity for CBM reading passages. Diagnostique, 17, 202-208.
4. Baker, S. K., & Good, R. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561-578.
5. Bean, R. M., & Lane, S. (1990). Implementing curriculum-based measures of reading in an adult literacy program. Remedial and Special Education, 11(5), 39-46.
6. Bear, D. R. (1991). "Learning to fasten the seat of my union suit without looking around": The synchrony of literacy development. Theory Into Practice, 30, 149-157.
7. Bentz, J., Shinn, M. R., & Gleason, M. M. (1990). Training general education pupils to monitor reading using curriculum-based measurement procedures. School Psychology Review, 19, 23-32.
8. Bradley-Johnson, S., & Evans, L. D. (1991). Psychoeducational assessment of hearing-impaired students: Infancy through high school. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.*
9. Center for Assessment and Demographic Studies. (1991). Stanford achievement test, eighth edition: Hearing impaired norms booklet. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University.*
10. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
11. Deno, S. L., & Fuchs, L. S. (1987). Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19, 1-16.
12. Deno, S. L., Marston, D., Mirkin, P. K., Lowry, L., Sindelar, P., & Jenkins, J. (1982). The use of standard tasks to measure achievement in reading, spelling, and written expression: A normative and developmental study (Research Report No. 87). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227 129)
13. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-47.
14. Espin, C. A., & Deno, S. L. (1993). Performance in reading from content area text as an indicator of achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 47-59.
15. Frank, A. R., & Gerken, K. C. (1990). Case studies in curriculum-based measurement. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 113-119.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., Marston, D. (1983). Improving the reliability of curriculum-based measures of academic skills for psychoeducational decision making. Diagnostique, 8, 135-149.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
18. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199-208.
19. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989a). Effects of instrumental use of CBM to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 43-52.
20. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989b). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 103-111.
21. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Whinnery, K. (1991). Effects of goal line feedback on level, slope, and stability of performance within curriculum-based measurement. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 6, 66-74.
22. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20-29
23. Glor-Scheib, S., & Zigmond, N. (1993). Exploring the potential motivational properties of curriculum-based measurement in reading among middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 4, 35-43.
24. Gustason, G., & Zawolkow, E. (1993). Signing exact English. Los Alamitos, CA: Modern Signs Press.*
25. Jones, B. E., Clark, G. M., & Soltz, D. F. (1997). Characteristics and practices of sign language interpreters in inclusive education programs. Exceptional Children, 63, 257-268.
26. Jones, E. D., & Krouse, J. P. (1988). The effectiveness of data-based instruction by student teachers in classrooms for pupils with mild learning handicaps. Teacher Education and Special Education, 11, 9-19.
27. Jordan, I. K., & Karchmer, M. A. (1986). Patterns of sign use among hearing impaired students. In A. N. Schildroth and M. A. Karchmer, (Eds.), Deaf children in America (pp. 125-138). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.*
28. Liddell, S. (1980). American sign language syntax. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.*
29. Lucas, C. (1990). Sign language research: Theoretical issues. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.*
30. Madden, R., Gardner, E. F., Rudman, H. L., Karlsen, B., & Merwin, J. L. (1972). Stanford achievement tests, special edition for hearing impaired students. Washington, DC: Office of Demographic Studies, Gallaudet University.*
31. Marschark, M. (1993). Psychological development of deaf children. New York: Oxford Press.*
32. Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach of assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.*
33. Mauk, G. W., & Mauk, P. P. (1993). Compounding the challenge: Young deaf children and learning disabilities. Perspectives, 12, 12-18.
34. Moores, D. F. (1987). The education of the deaf (3rd ed.). Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.*
35. Morgan, A., & Vernon, M. (1994). A guide to the diagnosis of learning disabilities in deaf and hard of hearing children and adults. American Annuals of the Deaf, 139, 356-370.
36. Morgan, S. K., & Bradley-Johnson, S. (1995). Technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement for Braille readers. School Psychology Review, 24, 94-103.
37. Mullen, Y. (1992). Assessment of the preschool child with hearing impairments. In E. V. Nuttall, J. Kalesnki, & I. Romero (Eds.), Assessing and screening preschoolers. (pp. 327-344). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.*
38. Reid, D. K., Hresko, W. P., & Hammill, D. D. (1989). Test of early reading ability (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.*
39. Reid, D. K., Hresko, W. P., Hammill, D. D., & Wiltshire, S. M. (1991). Test of early reading ability: Special edition for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed*.
40. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1995). Assessment (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.*
41. Schick, B., & Moeller, M. P. (1992). What is learnable in manually coded English sign systems? Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 313-340.
42. Schirmer, B. R. (1994). Language and literacy development in children who are deaf. New York: Merrill.*
43. Sikora, D. M., & Plapinger, D. S. (1994). Using standardized psychometric tests to identify learning disabilities in students with sensorineural hearing impairments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 352-359.
44. Smith, D. D., & Luckasson, R. (1995). Introduction to special education: Teaching in an age of challenge (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.*
45. Stokoe, W. (1976). A dictionary of American sign language: A linguistic principle. Silver Springs, MD: Linstock Press.*
46. Swain, K. D., & Allinder, R. M. (1997). An exploration of the use of curriculum-based measurement by elementary special educators. Manuscript submitted for publication.
47. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.*
48. Tindal, G. A., & Marston, D. B. (1990). Classroom-based assessment: Evaluating instructional outcomes. Columbus, OH: Merrill.*
49. Toubanos, E. S. (1995). Review of the Test of Early Reading Ability - Deaf or Hard of Hearing. In Connelly, J. C., & Impara, J. C. (Eds.), The twelve mental measurement yearbook. (pp. 1051-1053). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.*
50. Trybus, R. J., & Karchmer, M. A. (1977). School achievement scores of hearing impaired children: National data on achievement status and growth patterns. American Annals of the Deaf Directory of Programs and Services, 122, 62-69.
51. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.*
52. Wilson, M. S., Schendel, J. M., & Ulman, J. E. (1992). Curriculum-based measures, teachers' ratings, and group achievement scores: Alternative screening measures. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 59-76.