Assessment of the State of School Effectiveness Research in the United States of America

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 159-180

  Stringfield, Sam ^a   Herman, Rebecca ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039606624     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0924345960070204     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aitkin, M., & Longford, N. (1986). Statistical modeling issues in school effectiveness studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 149(1), 1-43.
2. Anderson, L., Sears, J., Pellicer, L., Riddle, M., Gardner, C., & Howell, D. (1992). A study of the characteristics and qualities of 'High-Flying' compensatory programs in South Carolina as examined through the framework of the SERVE model for effective compensatory programs. Columbia, SC: Department of Educational Leadership and Policies, University of South Carolina.
3. Austin, G. (1989). School effectiveness and improvement in the United States. In D. Reynolds, B. Creemers, & T. Peters (Eds.), School effectiveness and improvement. Proceedings of the First International Congress. Cardiff: University of Wales College at Cardiff.
4. Bodilly, S. (1995). Lessons learned from RAND's Formative assessment of NASDC's phase 2 demonstration effort. Santa Monica: Rand.
5. Brookover, W., Beady, C. Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). Schools social systems and student achievement: Schools can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
6. Brophy, J. (1988). Research on teacher effects: Uses and abuses. Elementary School Journal, 89, 3-22.
7. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
8. Bryk, A.S., Lee, V.E., & Holland, P.B. (1993). Catholic schools. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.
9. Burstein, L. (Ed.). (1993). The IEA study of mathematics III: Student growth and classroom procedures. NY: Pergamon Press.
10. Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
11. Comer, J.P. (1980). School power: Implications of an intervention project. New York: Free Press.
12. Cronbach, L., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure 'change' - or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 66-80.
13. Crone, L.J., Lang, M.H., Teddlie, C., & Franklin, B. (1995). Achievement measures of school effectiveness: Comparison of model stability across years. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 365-377.
14. Crone, L., & Teddlie, C. (1995). Further examination of teacher behavior in differentially effective schools: Selection and socialization processes. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30, 1-9.
15. Cuban, L. (1993a). Forward. In C. Teddlie & S. Stringfield (Eds.), Schools make a difference. New York: Teachers College.
16. Cuban, L. (1993b). How teachers taught (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College.
17. Day, J., Cordon, L., & Kerwin, M. (1989). Informal instruction and development of cognitive skills: A review and critique of research. In C.B. McCormick, G.E. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: From basic research to educational applications. New York: Springer Verlag.
18. Durland, M., & Teddlie, C. (1996, April). A network analysis of the structural dimensions of principal leadership in differentially effective schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
19. Edmonds, R. (1979a). A discussion of the literature and issues related to effective schooling. Cambridge: Center for Urban Studies, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
20. Edmonds, R. (1979b). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15-27.
21. Evans, L., & Teddlie, C. (1995). Facilitating change in schools: Is there one best style? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 1-22.
22. Freeman, J., & Teddlie, C. (1996, April). A phenomenological examination of 'naturally occurring' school improvement: Implications for democratization of schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
23. Gage, N.L. (Ed.). (1963). Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
24. General Accounting Office (1989). Effective schools programs: Their extent and characteristics (GAO Publication No. HRD-89-132BR). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1986). School effects. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd Edition). NY: Macmillan.
26. Kochan, S.E., Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1996, April). You can't judge a high school by test data alone: Constructing an alternative indicator of secondary school effectiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
27. Kozol, J. (1992). Savage inequalities. New York: Harper.
28. Levin, H. (1987). Accelerated schools for disadvantaged students. Educational Leadership, 44, 19-21.
29. Levine, D.U., & Lezotte, L.W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison, WI: The National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
30. McLaughlin, M. (1990). The Rand Change Agent Study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19, 11-16.
31. Mecklenburger, J. (1992). The breaking of the 'break-the-mold' express. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 280-289.
32. Mentzer, D., & Shaunessy, T. (1996). Hawthorne Elementary School: The teachers' perspective. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1, 13-24.
33. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P. Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters. London: Open Books.
35. New York State Office of Education Performance Review (1974). School factors influencing reading achievement: A performance review. Albany, NY: Author. (ERIC ED 089 211).
36. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Puma, M., Jones, C., Rock, D., & Fernandez, R. (1993). Prospects: The congressionally mandated study of educational growth and opportunity: Interim report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
38. Rand Corporation (1978). Volume VIII: Implementing and sustaining innovations (Research Report No. R-1589/8 HEW). Santa Monica, CA: Author.
39. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (1989). Methodological advances in analyzing the effects of schools and classrooms on student learning. In E.Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 15). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
40. Reynolds, D. (1992). School effectiveness and school improvement. In J. Bashi & Z. Sass (Eds.), School effectiveness and improvement: Selected proceedings of the Third International Congress for School Effectiveness (pp. 67-87). Jerusalem, Israel: Magnes Press.
41. Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., & Peters, T. (Eds.). (1989). School effectiveness and improvement. Proceedings of the First International Congress. Cardiff: University of Wales College at Cardiff.
42. Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
43. Rosenshine, B.V., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, third edition (pp. 376-391). New York: Macmillan.
44. Rutter, M. (1983). School effects on pupil progress: Research findings and policy implications. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 3-41). New York: Longman.
45. Rutter, M., Maugham, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effect on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Slater, R., & Teddlie, C. (1992). Toward a theory of school effectiveness and leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3, 247-257
47. Slavin, R.E. (1987). A theory of school and classroom organization. Educational Psychologist, 22, 89-108.
48. Slavin, R., Karweit, N., & Wasik, B. (1994). Preventing early school failure. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
49. Slavin, R., Madden, N., Karweit, N., Dolan, L., & Wasik, B. (1992). Success for all: A relentless approach to prevention and early intervention in elementary schools. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
50. Slavin, R., et al. (1996). Success for all: A summary of research. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1, 41-76.
51. Smith, M., & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). Bristol, PA: Falmer.
52. Smith, E., & Tyler, R. (1942). Appraising and recording student progress: Evaluation, records and reports in the thirty schools. New York: Harper.
53. Special Study Panel on Education Indicators (1991). Education counts: An indicator system to monitor the nation's educational health.
54. Stallings, J., & Kaskowitz, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation 1972-1973 (SRI Project URU-7370). Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
55. Stringfield, S. (1994). Outlier studies of school effectiveness. In D. Reynolds, B. Creemers, P. Nesselrodt, E. Schaffer, S. Stringfield, & C. Teddlie, Advances in school effectiveness research. Oxford: Pergamon.
56. Stringfield, S., & Herman, R. (1995). School effectiveness and school improvement: Recent U.S. Advances. In B. Creemers (Ed.), International developments in theory and practice of school effectiveness and school improvement. Leeuwarden, The Netherlands: RION.
57. Stringfield, S. & Herman, R. (1995). The Barclay/Calvert project: A case study in effective school improvement. Invited presentation at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
58. Stringfield, S., Millsap, M., Herman, R., & Scott, E. (1996). Urban and suburban/rural special strategies for educating disadvantaged children: Summary of three-year findings. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
59. Stringfield, S., Millsap, M., Herman, R., & Scott, E. (1996, April). The three-year effects of 10 promising programs on the academic achievements of students placed at risk. Paper presented a the American Educational Research Association, NY.
60. Stringfield, S., Ross, S., & Smith, L. (Eds.), (in press). Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools Development Corporation models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Stringfield, S., & Slavin, R. (1992). A hierarchical, longitudinal model for elementary school effects. In B. Creemers & G. Reezigt (Eds.), Evaluation of educational effectiveness. The Hague, The Netherlands: Interuniversitair Centrum voor Onderwijsonderzoek.
62. Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (1991a). Observers as predictors of schools' multi-year outlier status. Elementary School Journal, 91, 357-376.
63. Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (1991b). Schools as affectors of teacher effects. In H. Waxman, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 161-179.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
64. Stringfield, S., Winfield, L., Millsap, M., Puma, M., Gamse, B., & Randall, B. (1994). Urban and suburban/rural special strategies for educating disadvantaged children: First year report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
65. Teddlie, C., Falkowski, C., Stringfield, S., Desselle, S., & Garvue, R. (1984). The Louisiana School Effectiveness Study: Phase two, 1982-84. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Department of Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 250 362).
66. Teddlie, C., Lang, M.H., & Oescher, J. (1995). The masking of the delivery of educational services to lower achieving students. Urban Education, 30, 125-149.
67. Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. NY: Teachers College Press.
68. Thomas, L. (1979). Medical lessons from history. In L. Thomas (Ed.), The medusa and the snail. NY: Viking.
69. Travers, R.M. (Ed.). (1973). Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago, Rand McNally.
70. U.S. Department of Education (1994). The Goals 2000: Educate America Act.
71. Vigotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
72. Wasik, B., & Slavin, R. (1994). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring. In R. Slavin, N. Karweit, & B. Wasik (Eds.), Preventing early school failure. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
73. Weber, G. (1971). Inner city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools (Occasional Paper No. 18). Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
74. Willett, J. (1989). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. In E.Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 15). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
75. Wittrock, M. (Ed.). (1986). Handbook of research on teaching, third edition. New York: Macmillan.
76. Yin, R. (1989). Case study methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.