Insights

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 465-472

  Bardach, Eugene ^a   Mead, Lawrence M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039604427     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bishop, J. (1998). Is welfare reform succeeding? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations.
2. Blank, R. (1997). What causes public assistance caseloads to grow? Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
3. Brudney, J., Hebert, F., & Wright, D. (1999). Reinventing government in the American states: Measuring and explaining administrative reform. Public Administration Review, 59, 19-30.
4. Chinn, M. (1991). Beware of econometricians bearing estimates: Policy analysis in a "unit root" world. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10, 546-567.
5. Congressional Budget Office (1993). Forecasting AFDC caseloads, with an emphasis on economic factors. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
6. Council of Economic Advisors (1997). Explaining the decline in welfare receipt, 1993-1996. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
7. DeParle, J. (1997, Dec. 30). Success and frustration, as welfare rules change. New York Times, pp. A1, A16.
8. Elazar, D. (1966). American federalism: A view from the states. New York: Crowell.
9. Fein, D. (1996). Understanding recent declines in state AFDC caseloads: An analysis of cross-state variation. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
10. Hagen, J., & Lurie, I. (1994). Implementing JOBS: Progress and promise. Albany: State University of New York at Albany, Rockefeller Institute of Government.
11. Hamilton, G., Brock, T., Farrell, M., Friedlander, D., Harknett, K., with Hunter-Manns, J., Walter, J., & Weissman, J. (1997). National evaluation of welfare-to-work strategies: Evaluating two welfare-to-work approaches: Two-year findings on the labor force attachment and human capital development programs in three sites. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Education.
12. Mead, L. (1996). Welfare policy: The administrative frontier. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15, 587-600.
13. Mead, L. (1999). The decline of welfare in Wisconsin. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 597-622.
14. Meyer, B., & Rosenbaum, D. (1998). Welfare, the earned income tax credit, and the employment of single mothers. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Institute for Policy Research.
15. Sharkansky, I. (1969). The utility of Elazar's political culture: A research note. Polity, 2, 66-83.
16. Wallace, G., & Blank, R. (1999). What goes up must come down? Explaining recent changes in public assistance caseloads. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Department of Economics.
17. Wonnacott, R., & Wonnacott, T. (1979). Econometrics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
18. Ziliak, J., Figlio, D., Davis, E., & Connolly, L. (1997). Accounting for the decline in AFDC caseloads: Welfare reform or economic growth. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Institute for Research on Poverty.