Restructuring special education funding in New York to promote the objective of high learning standards for all students

Economics of Education Review

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 431-445

  Parrish, Thomas B ^a  

^a American Institutes of Research   (United States)

Author keywords

I21; I22

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039591686     PISSN: 02727757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(00)00002-9     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allington R.L., McGill-Franzen A. Unintended effects of educational reform in New York. Educational Policy. 6:1992;397-414.
2. Elam S.M., Rose L.C., Gallup A.M. The 28th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools. Kappan. 78(1):1996;41-59.
3. The Equity Study Group (1993). Summary Report of the Equity Study Group: The Road to Outcome Equity.
4. Erickson R. Special Education in an Era of School Reform: Accountability, Standards and Assessment. 1997;Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC.
5. Erickson R., Thurlow M.L., McGrew K. 1994 State Special Education Outcomes. 1995;University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes, Minneapolis, MN.
6. Gerald D.E., Hussar W.J. Projections of Education Statistics to 2005 (NCES 95-169). 1995;US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
7. McGrew K.S., Thurlow M.L., Shriner J.G., Spiegel A. Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in National and State Data Collection Systems. 1992;University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes, Minneapolis, MN.
8. McLaughlin M.J., Warren S.H. Issues and Options in Restructuring Schools and Special Education Programs. 1992;University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
9. Moore M.T., Strang E.W., Schwartz M., Braddock M. Patterns in Special Education Service Delivery and Cost. 1988;Decision Resources Corporation, Washington, DC.
10. National Governors' Association and National Association of State Budget Officers (1994). Fiscal Survey of the States. Washington, DC: National Governors' Association and National Association of State Budget Officers.
11. New York State Education Department (1997a). Special Education. Albany, NY: New York State Education Department.
12. New York State Education Department (1997b). Update on New York States's Overall Strategy for Raising Standards. Albany, NY: New York State Education Department.
13. Parrish T.B., Montgomery D.L. Politics of Special Education Finance Reform in Three States - State Analysis Series. 1995;American Institutes for Research, Center for Special Education Finance, Palo Alto, CA.
14. Shields, P. M., Jay, D. E., Parrish, T., Padilla, C. (1989). Alternative Programs and Strategies for Serving Students with Leaning Disabilities and Other Learning Problems - Final Report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
15. Stancavage, F., McLaughlin, D., Vergun, R., Godlewski, C., Allen, J. (1996). Study of Exclusion and Assessability of Students with Disabilities in the 1994 Trial State Assessment (TSA) of the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP). Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
16. Verstegen D.A. The economic and demographic dimensions of national education policy. Ward J.G., Anthony P. Demographic Trends and Cultural Diversity: Challenges for School Finance Policy. 1991;Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
17. Ysseldyke J., Algozzine B., Richey L., Graden J. Declaring students eligible for learning disability services: Why bother with the data? Learning Quarterly. 5:1982;37-44.
18. Zlatos B. Don't ask, don't tell. The American School Board Journal. 11:1994;24-28.