Hidden-feature inclusions in children's drawings: The effects of age and model familiarity

British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 441-455

  Krascum, Ruth ^a   Tregenza, Clair ^a   Whitehead, Paul ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039566608     PISSN: 0261510X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835x.1996.tb00717.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barrett, M. D., Beaumont, A. V. & Jennett, M. S. (1985). Some children do sometimes do what they are told to do: Task demands and verbal instructions in children's drawing. In N. H. Freeman & M. Cox (Eds), Visual Order, pp. 176-187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barrett, M. D. & Light, P. H. (1976). Symbolism and intellectual realism in children's drawings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 198-202.
3. Bremner, G. & Moore, S. (1984). Prior visual inspection and object naming: Two factors that enhance hidden feature inclusion in young children's drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 371-376.
4. Cox, M. V. (1986). Cubes are difficult things to draw. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 341-345.
5. Davis, A. M. (1983). Contextual sensitivity in young children's drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 478-486.
6. Davis, A. M. (1984). Noncanonical orientation without occlusion: Children's drawings of transparent objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 451-462.
7. Freeman, N. H. (1980). Strategies of Representation in Young Children. New York/London: Academic Press.
8. Freeman, N. H. & Janikoun, R. (1972). Intellectual realism in children's drawings of a familiar object with distinctive features. Child Development, 43, 1116-1121.
9. Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Keil, F. C. & Batterman, N. (1984). A characteristic to defining shift in the development of word meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 221-236.
11. Lewis, C., Russell, C. & Berridge, D. (1993). When is a mug not a mug? Effects of content, naming, and instructions on children's drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 291-302.
12. Light, P. & McEwen, F. (1987). Drawings as messages: The effect of a communicative game upon production of view-specific drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 53-60.
13. Light, P. H. & MacIntosh, E. (1980). Depth relationships in young children's drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 79-87.
14. Light, P. & Simmons, B. (1983). The effects of a communication task upon the representation of depth relationships in young children's drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 81-92.
15. Luquet, G. (1927). Le Dessin Enfantin. Paris: Alcan.
16. Madole, K. L., Oakes, L. M. & Cohen, L. B. (1993). Developmental changes in infants' attention to function and form-function correlations. Cognitive Development, 8, 189-209.
17. Melkman, R., Tversky, B. & Baratz, D. (1981). Developmental trends in the use of perceptual and conceptual attributes in grouping, clustering and retrieval. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 470-486.
18. Moore, V. (1987). The influence of experience on children's drawings of a familiar and unfamiliar object. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 221-229.
19. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.
20. Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J. & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory; A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241.
21. Taylor, M. & Bacharach, V. R. (1982). Constraints on the visual accuracy of drawings produced by young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 311-329.
22. Tversky, B. (1985). Development of taxonomic organization of named and pictured categories. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1111-1119.