The "old" public management versus the "new" public management: Where does public administration fit in?

Public Administration Review

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 172-175

  Riccucci, Norma M ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039563405     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00019     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allison, Graham T. 1980. Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects? In Current Issues in Public Administration, 3rd ed., edited by Frederick S. Lane, 184-200. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1986.
2. Carroll, James D. 1995. The Rhetoric of Reform and Political Reality in the National Performance Review. Public Administration Review 55(3): 302-12.
3. deLeon, Linda, and Robert B. Denhardt. 2000. The Political Theory of Reinvention. Public Administration Review 60(2): 89-97.
4. Drucker, Peter F. 1995. Really Reinventing Government. Atlantic Monthly 275 (February): 49-57.
5. Frederickson, H. George. 1996. Comparing the Reinventing Government Movement with the New Public Administration. Public Administration Review 56(3): 263-70.
6. _. 2000. Can Bureaucracy Be Beautiful? Public Administration Review 60(1): 47-53.
7. Goodsell, Charles. 1993. Reinventing Government or Rediscovering It? Public Administration Review 53 (1): 85-6.
8. Gulick, Luther, and Lyndall Urwick, eds. 1937. Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
9. Karl, Barry. 1976. Public Administration and American History: A Century of Professionalism. Public Administration Review 36(5): 489-503.
10. Kaufman, Herbert. 1956. Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration. American Political Science Review 50: 1057-73.
11. Kettl, Donald F., and H. Brinton Milward, eds. 1996. The State of Public Management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Lan, Z., and David H. Rosenbloom. 1992. Public Administration in Transition? Public Administration Review 52 (6): 535-7.
13. Lynn, Laurence E. Jr. 1994. Government Lite. American Prospect 19(Winter): 135-44.
14. _. 1996. Public Management as Art, Science, and Profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
15. Moe, Ronald C. 1994. The "Reinventing Government" Exercise: Misinterpreting the Problem, Misjudging the Consequences. Public Administration Review 54(2): 111-22.
16. Nathan, Richard P. 1983. The Administrative Presidency. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
17. Rosenbloom, David H. 1983. Public Administrative Theory and the Separation of Powers. Public Administration Review 43(3): 219-227.
18. _. 1993. Have an Administrative Rx? Don't Forget the Politics! Public Administration Review 53(6): 503-7.
19. _. 2000. Building a Legislative-Centered Public Administration. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
20. Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
21. Stillman, Richard J. II. 1991. Preface to Public Administration: A Search for Themes and Direction. New York: St. Martin's Press.
22. Taylor, Frederick W. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Row.
23. Thompson, Frank J. 1993. Public Administration and Post-Reagan Reform: Boon or Barrier to Theory. Administration and Politics 3(Winter): 12-16.
24. Thompson, James R., and Patricia W. Ingraham. 1996. The Reinvention Game. Public Administration Review 56(3): 291-8.