Public administration research from a practitioner perspective

Public Administration Review

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 515-525

  Streib, Gregory ^b   Slotkin, Bert J ^b   Rivera, Mark ^a  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039563397     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00124     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adams, Guy B. 1992. Enthralled with Modernity: The Historical Context of Knowledge and Theory Development in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 52(4): 363-73.
2. American Society for Public Administration. 2000. Strategic Plan: Mission and Vision. Available at http://aspanet.ord/new/ stplanx.htm. Accessed February 18, 2000.
3. Bingham, Richard D., and William M. Bowen. 1994. Mainstream Public Administration over Time: A Topical Content Analysis of Public Administration Review. Public Administration Review 54(2): 204-8.
4. Box, Richard C. 1992. An Examination of the Debate over Research in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 52(1): 62-9.
5. Brewer, Gene A., James W. Douglas, Rex L. Facer II, and Laurence J. O'Toole, Jr. 1999. Determinants of Graduate Research Productivity in Doctoral Programs of Public Administration. Public Administration Review 59(5): 373-82.
6. Cleary, Robert E. 1992. Revisiting the Doctoral Dissertation in Public Administration: An Examination of the Dissertations of 1990. Public Administration Review 52(1): 55-61.
7. Felbinger, Claire L. 1989. Effective Local Government Management: Role Emphasis of Public Works Directors. American Review of Public Administration 19(2): 119-32.
8. Felts, Arthur A., and Robert A. Schuman. 1997. Local Government Administrators: A Balance Wheel Breakdown. American Review of Public Administration 27(4): 363-76.
9. Forrester, John P., and Sheilah S. Watson. 1994. An Assessment of Public Administration Journals: The Perspective of Editors and Editorial Board Members. Public Administration Review 54(5): 474-82.
10. Garson, David G., and E. Samuel Overman. 1983. Public Management Research in the United States. New York: Praeger Publishers.
11. Halachmi, Arie. 1998. Dealing with Employees over Fifty: Reflections and an Introduction. Public Productivity and Management Review 22(1): 6-14.
12. Houston, David J., and Sybil M. Delevan. 1990. Public Administration Research: An Assessment of Journal Publications. Public Administration Review 50(6): 674-81.
13. International City/County Management Association. 2000. Declaration of Ideals. Available at http://www.icma.org/. Accessed February 16, 2000.
14. McCurdy, Howard E., and Robert E. Cleary. 1984. Why Can't We Resolve the Research Issue in Public Administration? Public Administration Review 44(1): 49-55.
15. Public Administration Review. 2000a. Our Editorial Philosophy. Public Administration Review website. Available at http:// par.csuohio.edu/submit5.html. Accessed February 16, 2000.
16. _. 2000b. PAR Homepage. Available at http:// par.csuohio.edu/index.html. Accessed February 16, 2000.
17. Perry, James L., and Kenneth L. Kraemer. 1986. Research Methodology in the Public Administration Review, 1975-1984. Public Administration Review 46(3): 215-26.
18. Stallings, Robert A. 1986. Doctoral Programs in Public Administration: An Outsider's Perspective. Public Administration Review 46(3): 235-9.
19. Stallings, Robert A., and James M. Ferris. 1988. Public Administration Research: Work in PAR, 1940-1984. Public Administration Review 48(1): 580-6.
20. Watson, Douglas J., and Robert S. Montjoy. 1991. Research on Local Government in Public Administration Review. Public Administration Review 51(2): 166-70.
21. White, Jay D. 1986a. On the Growth of Knowledge in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 46(1): 15-24.
22. _. 1986b. Dissertations in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 46(3): 227-34.