Comprehension-based learning: The limits of 'do it yourself'

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 427-460

  Lightbown, Patsy M ^a   Halter, Randall H ^a   White, Joanna L ^a   Horst, Marlise ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039563281     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.58.3.427     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbs, B., Worrall, A., & Bolduc, I. (1982). Jigsaw two. Montreal: Centre éducatif et culturel.
2. Asher, J. (1977). Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher's guidebook. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions.
3. Beck, I., McKeown, M., & Omanson, R. (1987). The effects and use of diverse vocabulary instruction techniques. In M. McKeown & M Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Blair, R. (Ed.). (1982). Innovative approaches to language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
5. Cook, V. (1991). Second language learning and language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
6. Day, R., & Bamford, J., (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Elley, W., & Mangubhai, F. (1983). The impact of reading on second language learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 53-67.
8. Forsyth, A. (1990, summer). Projet expérimental en anglais langue seconde à l'élémentaire au Nouveau-Brunswick. Education Canada, 23-29.
9. Gardner, D. (1999). Vocabulary acquisition through reading: Assessing the lexical composition of theme-based text collections in upper-elementary education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
10. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
11. Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.
12. Krashen, S. (1993). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
13. Laufer, B. (1989). A factor of difficulty in vocabulary learning: Deceptive transparency. AILA Review, 6, 10-20.
14. Laufer, B., & Sim., D. (1985). Taking the easy way out: Non-use and misuse of clues in EFL reading. English Teaching Forum, 23 (2), 9-20.
15. Lightbown, P. M. (1983a). Acquiring English L2 in Québec classrooms. In S. Felix & H. Wode (Eds.), Language development at the crossroads (pp. 101-120). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
16. Lightbown, P. M. (1983b). Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in language acquisition (pp. 217-245). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
17. Lightbown, P. M. (1984). Input and acquisition in second language classrooms. TESL Canada Journal, 1, 55-67.
18. Lightbown, P. M., (1985). Input and acquisition for second language learners in and out of classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 6, 263-273.
19. Lightbown, P. M. (1988). Evaluation of ESL learning in regular and experimental programs in four New Brunswick school districts: 1985-87 (Vol. 1). Research report prepared for the Ministry of Education of New Brunswick.
20. Lightbown, P. M. (1991). What have we here? Some observations on the role of instruction in second language acquisition. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (pp. 197-212). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
21. Lightbown, P. M. (1992a). Can they do it themselves? A comprehension-based ESL course for young children. In R. Courchêne, J. St. John, C. Thérien, & J. Glidden (Eds.), Comprehension-based language teaching: Current trends (pp. 353-370). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
22. Lightbown, P. M. (1992b). Getting quality input in the second/foreign language classroom. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural perspectives on language study. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
23. Lightbown, P. M. (2001). Input filters in second language acquisition. In S. Foster-Cohen & A. Nizegorodcew (Eds.) EUROSLA yearbook. Volume 1: 2001 (pp. 79-97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Lightbown, P. M., & Halter, R. (1989). Evaluation of ESL learning regular and experimental programs in four New Brunswick school districts: 1987-88 (Vol. 2). Research report prepared for the Ministry of Education of New Brunswick.
25. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
26. Lyster, R. (1994). La négociation de la forme: Stratégie analytique en classe d'immersion. La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 50, 446-465,
27. McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
28. Meara, P. M. (1992). EFL vocabulary tests. Unpublished manuscript, Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Wales, Swansea.
29. Meara, P. M., & Buxton, B. (1987). An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 4, 142-154.
30. Ministère de l'Éducation du Québec. (1981). Tests relatifs à l'apprentissage scolaire et parascolaire, anglais langue seconde (No. 234 230). Montreal: Direction générale de l'évaluation pédagogique.
31. Mondria, J.-A., & Wit-De Boer, M. (1991). The effects of contextual richness on the guessability and retention of words in a foreign language. Applied Linguistics, 12, 249-267.
32. Nation, I. S. P. (1986). Vocabulary lists: Words, affixes and stems. Wellington: Victoria University: English Language Institute.
33. Pienemann, M. (1999). Language processing and second language development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34. Postovsky, V. (1977). Why not start speaking later? In M. Burt, H. Dulay, & M. Finocchiaro (Eds.), View points on English as a second language (pp. 17-26). New York: Regents.
35. Postovsky, V. (1981). The priority of aural comprehension in the language acquisition process. In H. Winitz (Ed.), The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction (pp. 170-186). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
36. Prowse, P. (1999). Cambridge English readers: Teacher's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Schachter, J. (1988). Second language acquisition and its relationship to Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics, 9, 219-235.
38. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
39. Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-163.
40. Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension vs. acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7, 118-132.
41. Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21 (4), 360-407.
42. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.). Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
43. Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6, 68-83.
44. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45. White, J. L. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95-110.
47. White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P.M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement in L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416-432.
48. Winitz, H., & Reeds, J. (1973). Rapid acquisition of a foreign language (German) by the avoidance of speaking. IRAL, 11, 295-317.