Pretrial Publicity, the Timing of the Trial, and Mock Jurors' Decision Processes

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 1986, Pages 590-607

  Davis, Roger W ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039553951     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01161.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Methodological considerations in the study of the psychology of the courtroom
2. Justice and the jury
3. Prejudicial publicity: An assessment
4. The partial juror: Correlates and causes of prejudgment
5. The empirical study of social decision processes injuries
6. Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juries
7. The impartial jury—Twentieth century dilemma: Some solutions to the conflict between free press and fair trial
8. Is it time to lay the sleeper effect to rest
9. The effect of several types of pretrial publicity on the guilt attributions of simulated jurors
10. Holt v. United States
11. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness
12. Irvin v. Dowd
13. Effects of presentation mode upon mock jurors' reactions to a trial
14. The institutionalization of conflict: Jury acquittals
15. Cognitive processes in the individual juror
16. Reducing the effects of juror bias
17. On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts
18. Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors' verdicts
19. Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition, and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors
20. Prejudicial publicity: Its effect on law school mock juries
21. A critique of theory and method in social‐psychological approaches to legal issues
22. Marshall v. United States
23. Fair trial and prejudicial publicity: A need for reform
24. The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors' verdicts
25. Rideau v. Louisiana
26. Murder, juries, and the press
27. Does the court's decision in Nebraska Press Association fit the research evidence on the impact of jurors of news coverage
28. The impact of pretrial publicity on the jury
29. Thejury finds not guilty: Another look at media influence on the jury
30. Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity and awareness of bias in simulated jurors
31. Pretrial publicity and juror prejudice
32. Law, justice, and the individual in society
33. Crime story elements and fair trial/free press
34. The American trial jury on trial: Empirical evidence and procedural modifications