Social behaviors as determined by different arrangements of social consequences: Social loafing, social facilitation, deindividuation, and a modified social loafing

Psychological Record

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 565-578

  Guerin, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039521827     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395327     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ABRAMS, D., WETHERELL, M., COCHRANE, S., HOGG, M. A., & TURNER, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2. BREWER, N. (1995). The effects of monitoring individual and group performance on the distribution of effort across tasks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 760-777.
3. BURNHAM, W. H. (1910). The group as a stimulus to mental activity. Science, 31, 761-766.
4. COTTRELL, N. B. (1972). Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 185-236). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5. DIENER, E. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 209-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. FELDMAN, R. S. (1995). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. FESTINGER, L., PEPITONE, A., & NEWCOMB, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382-389.
8. GEEN, R. G. (1989). Alternative conceptions of social facilitation. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. GRIFFITH, T. L, FINCHAM, M., & MORELAND, R. L. (1989). Social loafing and social facilitation: An empirical test of the cognitive-motivational model of performance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 253-271.
10. GUERIN, B. (1983). Social facilitation and social monitoring: A test of three models. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 203-214.
11. GUERIN, B. (1991). Anticipating the consequences of social behavior. Current Psychology: Research and Reviews, 10, 131-162.
12. GUERlN, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. GUERIN, B. (1994). Analyzing social behavior: Behavior analysis and the social sciences. Reno, NV: Context Press.
14. GUERIN, B. (1995a). Generalized social consequences, ritually reinforced behaviors, and the difficulties of analysing social contingencies in the real world. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 13, 11-14.
15. GUERIN, B. (1995b). Social influence in one-to-one and group situations: Predicting influence tactics from basic group processes. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 371-385.
16. GUERIN, B., & SEJIMA, J. (1997). Verbal community reinforcement, with an illustration using the Esoteric Buddhist concepts of Fuse and Muzai No Nanase. The Psychological Record, 47, 233-241.
17. HARKINS, S. G. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1 -18.
18. HARKINS, S. G., & PETTY, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214-1229.
19. HARKINS, S. G., & PETTY, R. E. (1983). Social context effects in persuasion: The effects of multiple sources and multiple targets. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 149-175). New York: Springer.
20. HARKINS, S. G., & SZYMANSKI, K. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation: New wine in old bottles. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 167-188). London: Sage.
21. HARKINS, S. G., & SZYMANSKI, K. (1988). Social loafing and self-evaluation with an objective standard. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 354-365.
22. HARKINS, S. G., & SZYMANSKI, K. (1989). Social loafing and group evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 934-941.
23. HAYES, S. C. (Ed.). (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.
24. HAYES, S. C., ROSENFARB, I., WULFERT, E., MUNT, E. D., KORN, Z., & ZETTLE, R. D. (1985). Self-reinforcement effects: An artifact of social standard setting? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 201-214.
25. HOGG, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
26. HOGG, M. A., & ABRAMS, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and social processes. London: Routledge.
27. JACKSON, J. M., & WILLIAMS, K. D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 937-942.
28. KANTOR, J. R. (1982). Cultural psychology. Chicago, IL: Principia Press.
29. KARAU, S. J., & WILLIAMS, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
30. LATANÉ, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
31. LATANÉ, B., WILLIAMS, K., & HARKINS, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 823-832.
32. MILES, J. A., & GREENBERG, J. (1993). Using punishment threats to attenuate social loafing effects amongst swimmers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 246-265.
33. MYERS, D. G. (1994). Exploring social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. PAULUS, P. B. (1983). Group influences on individual task performance. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 97-120). New York: Springer-Verlag.
35. POSTMES, T., & SPEARS, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
36. PRENTICE-DUNN, S., & ROGERS, R. W. (1980). Effects of deindividuating situational cues and aggressive models on subjective deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 104-113.
37. PRENTICE-DUNN, S., & ROGERS, R. W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 503-513.
38. PRENTICE-DUNN, S., & ROGERS, R. W. (1989). Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 87-109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. REICHER, S. D. (1984). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioral effects of deindividuation in conditions of high and low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 341 -350.
40. REICHER, S. D., & LEVINE, M. (1994a). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145-163.
41. REICHER, S. D., & LEVINE, M. (1994b). On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 511-524.
42. REICHER, S. D., LEVINE, M., & GORDIJN, E. (1998). More on deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: Three studies on the effects of visibility to the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 15-40.
43. RINGELMANN, M. (1913). Recherches sur les moteurs animes: Travail de l'homme. Annales de l'Institut National Agronomique, 2e serie, 12, 1-40.
44. ROBERTS, R. N., NELSON, R. O., & OLSON, T. W. (1987). Self-instructions: An analysis of the differential effects of instructions and reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 235-242.
45. ROSENFARB, I., & HAYES, S. C. (1984). Social standard setting: The Achilles heel of informational accounts of therapeutic change. Behavior Therapy, 15, 515-528.
46. SANDERS, G. S. (1981). Driven by distraction: An integrative review of social facilitation theory and research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 227-251.
47. SANNA, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 774-786.
48. SZYMANSKI, K., & HARKINS, S. G. (1993). The effect of experimenter evaluation on self-evaluation within the social loafing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 268-286.
49. TRIPLETT, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
50. WHITE, G. L. (1977). Counternormative behavior as influenced by deindividuating conditions and reference group salience. Journal of Social Psychology, 103, 75-90.
51. WILLIAMS, K., HARKINS, S., & LATANÉ, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303-311.
52. WILLIAMS, K. D., & KARAU, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570-581.
53. WORCHEL, S., HART, D., & BUTEMEYER, J. (1991). Is social loafing a group phenomenon? The effects of membership interdependence on work output. Unpublished paper, Texas A&M University.
54. YAMAGISHI, T., & COOK, K. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 235-248.
55. ZAJONC, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
56. ZIMBARDO, P. G. (1970). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1969 (pp. 237-307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.