Features of practical argument engagement

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 535-550

  Vásquez Levy, Dorothy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039502348     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00004-3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Audi Practical reasoning. 1989;Routledge, London.
2. Fenstermacher G. Philosophy of research on teaching. Three aspects Wittrock M. C. Handbook of research on teaching. 3:1986;37-49 Macmillan, New York.
3. Fenstermacher G. The place of practical argument in the education of teachers. Richardson V. Teacher Change and The Staff Development Process. A Case in Reading Instruction:1994;23-42 Teachers College, New York.
4. Fenstermacher, G., & Richardson, V. (1991). The elicitation and reconstruction of practical arguments in teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, in Chicago, IL.
5. Fenstermacher G., Richardson V. The elicitation and reconstruction of practical arguments in teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 25(2):1993;101-114.
6. Forrester, J. W. (1988). Designing social and managerial systems. Paper presented at a Lord Symposium at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
7. Forrester, J. W. (1990). System dynamics as a foundation for pre-college education. Paper presented to the System Dynamics Group, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
8. Fosnot C. T. Enquiring teacher, enquiring learners. 1989;Teachers College, New York.
9. Glasser W. Control theory. 1984;Harper and Row, New York.
10. Green T. F. The activities of teaching. 1971;McGraw-Hill, New York.
11. Green T. F. Teacher-competence as practical rationality. Educational Theory. 26(3):1976;249-258.
12. Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and practice (J. Viertel, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.
13. Hamblin C. Imperatives. 1987;Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
14. Hamilton, M. L. (1989). The practical argument staff development process, school culture and their effects on teachers' beliefs and classroom practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
15. McKeon R. Introduction to Aristotle. 1947;Random House, New York.
16. Morgan B. Practical rationality. A self investigation Journal of Curriculum Studies. 25(2):1993;115-124.
17. Morine-Dershimer G. Premises in the practical arguments of preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education. 4(3):1988;215-229.
18. Morine-Dershimer G., Oliver B. Examining complexity of thought in secondary student teachers. Clark C., Lowyck J., Halkes R. Teacher thinking and professional action. 1988;International Study Association on Teacher Thinking (ISATT), Tilbury, The Netherlands.
19. Pendlebury S. Practical arguments and situational appreciation in teaching. Educational Theory. 40(2):1990;171-179.
20. Polanyi M. Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy:1958;The University of Chicago, Chicago.
21. Richardson V., Anders P. Final report of the Reading Instruction Study. 1990;College of Education, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 655).
22. Richardson V., Anders P., Tidwell D., Lloyd C. The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices in reading comprehension practices. American Educational Research Journal. 28(3):1991;559-586.
23. Richardson, V, & Valdez, A. (1991). Changes in teachers' beliefs about and theories of reading comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
24. Richardson-Koehler, V., & Fenstermacher, G. (1988, February). The use of practical arguments in staff development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA.
25. Segerberg K. The logic of deliberate action. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 11:1982;233-254.
26. Senge P. M. The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization:1990;Doubleday, New York.
27. Valdez, A. (1992). Changes in teachers' beliefs, understandings, and practices concerning reading comprehension through the use of practical arguments: A follow-up study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
28. van Manen M. Researching lived experience State. Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy:1990;University of New York, New York.
29. Vásquez-Levy, D. (1991, April). Research on teacher change: The practical arguments of three teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
30. Vásquez-Levy D. The use of practical arguments in clarifying and changing practical reasoning and classroom practices. Two cases Journal of Curriculum Studies. 25(2):1993;125-143.
31. Walton D. N. Practical reasoning. Goal-driven, knowledge-based action-guiding argumentation:1990;Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, MD.
32. Wiggins D. Deliberation and practical reasoning. Rorty A. Essays on Aristotle's Ethics. 1980;221-240 University of California, Berkeley.