Does the medium make the magic? The effects of cooperative learning and conferencing software

Computers and Composition

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 83-95

  Burley, Hansel ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Authentic learning environments collaboration computer assisted writing expert writers INTERCHANGE networked classrooms novice college writers

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039496652     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S8755-4615(98)90026-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ahern Terence. The effect of graphic interface on participation, interaction and student achievement in a computer-mediated small-group discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 9:1993;535-584.
2. Anderson John R. Cognitive psychology and its implications. 2nd edition :1990;Freeman, New York.
3. Bandura Albert. Self-efficacy: Toward a unified theory of behavioral change. Psychology Review. 84:1977;191-215.
4. Bereiter Carl, Scardamalia Marlene. The psychology of written composition. 1987;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Butler Deborah L., Winne Philip H. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research. 65:1995;254-281.
6. Borich Gary. Effective teaching methods. 3rd ed. 1996;Merrill/Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7. Costanzo William. The electronic text: Learning to write, read, and reason with computers. 1989;Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8. Daiute Colette. Can the computer simulate writers inner dialogues? Wresch W. The Computer in Composition Instruction. 1984;131-139 National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.
9. Daiute Colette. Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers. Research in the Teaching of English. 20:1986;141-159.
10. Dale Helen. Toward an understanding of collaborative writing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. 1992;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 343 152).
11. Eisner Elliot W. The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. 2nd ed. 1985;Macmillan, New York.
12. Flower Linda, Hayes John R. The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication. 31:(2):1980;21-32.
13. Flower Linda, Hayes John R. The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English. 15:1981;229-244.
14. Freedman Aviva, Clarke Linda. The effect of computer technology on composing processes and written products of grade 8 and grade 12 students. 1988;Queen's Printer for Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
15. Gagné Robert M. The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. 4th edition :1977;Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
16. Gagné Robert M., Briggs Leslie J., Wager William W. Principles of Instructional Design. 4th ed. 1992;Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
17. Glass Gene V., Hopkins Kenneth D. Statistical methods in education and psychology. 2nd ed. 1984;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Glaser Robert, Chi Michelene. Overview. Chi Michelene, Glaser Robert, Farr M. The nature of expertise. 1988;1-9 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Good Thomas, Brophy Jere. Looking in classrooms. 4th ed. 1987;Harper & Row, New York.
20. Haas Christina, Hayes John R. What did I just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English. 20:1986;22-35.
21. Hawisher Gail. The effects of word processing on the revision strategies of college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English. 21:1987;145-159.
22. Hawisher Gail E., Pemberton Michael A. The case for teacher as researcher in computers and composition studies. Writing Instructor. 10:(2):1991;77-88.
23. Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. The rhetoric of technology and the electronic writing class. College Composition and Communication. 42:1991;55-56.
24. Johnson David, Johnson Roger. Learning together and alone. 3rd. ed. 1991;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
25. Murry Donald M. A writer teaches writing. 2nd edition :1984;Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
26. McCutchen Deborah. Functional automaticity in children's writing: A problem of metacognitive control. Written Communication. 5:(3):1988;306-324.
27. Palmquist Michael E. Network-supported interaction in two writing classrooms. Computers and Composition. 10:(4):1993;25-58.
28. Pennington Martha. Modeling the students writer's acquisition of word processing skills: the interaction of the computer, writing, and language media. Computers and Composition. 10:(4):1993;69-79.
29. Peters William H. Research on teaching: Presage variables. Peters William H. Effective English teaching: Concept, research, and practice. 1987;25-43 National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.
30. Phye Gary, Andre Thomas. Cognitive classroom learning: Understanding, thinking, and problem solving. 1986;Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
31. Pufahl John. Alone on the word processor: Writing and revision. Teaching English in the Two-year College. 13:(1):1986;25-29.
32. Scardamalia Marlene, Bereiter Carl. Research on written composition. Wittrock Merlin S. Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd ed. 1986;778-803 Macmillan, New York.
33. Slavin Robert E. Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. 1990;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
34. Sternberg Robert J. The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. 1989;Penguin, New York.
35. Stolarek Elizabeth A. Prose modeling and metacognition: The effect of modeling on developing a metacognitive stance toward writing. Research in the Teaching of English. 28:1994;154-174.
36. White Edward. Teaching and assessing writing. 1988;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.