A New Test of Image Theory

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 93-116

  Seidl, Christian ^a   Traub, Stefan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039496443     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2786     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Battaglio R. C., Kagel J. H., Jiranyakul K. Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 3:1990;25-50.
2. Beach L. R. Image theory: Decision making in personal and organizational contexts. 1990;Wiley, Chichester.
3. Beach, L. R. 1997, The psychology of decision making: People in organizations, New Delhi, SAGE Publications.
4. Beach L. R., Mitchell T. R. Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making. Acta Psychologica. 66:1987;201-220.
5. Beach L. R., Puto C. P., Heckler S. E., Naylor G., Marble T. A. Differential versus unit weighting of violations, framing, and the role of probability in image theory's compatibility test. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 65:1996;77-82.
6. Beach L. R., Smith B., Lundell J., Mitchell T. R. Image theory: Descriptive sufficiency of a simple rule for the compatibility test. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 1:1988;17-28.
7. Beach L. R., Strom E. A toadstool among the mushrooms: Screening decisions and image theory's compatibility test. Acta Psychologica. 72:1989;1-12.
8. Bettman J. R., Kakkar P. Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. Journal of Consumer Research. 3:1977;233-240.
9. Camerer C. F. An experimental test of seven generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2:1989;61-104.
10. Dawes R. M. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist. 34:1979;571-582.
11. Dawes, R. M. 1988, Rational choice in an uncertain world, San Diego, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
12. Dawes R. M., Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin. 81:1974;94-106.
13. Dunegan K. J. Image theory: Testing the role of image compatibility in progress decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62:1995;79-86.
14. Harless D. W., Camerer C. F. The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica. 62:1994;1251-1289.
15. Hey J. D., Di Cagno D. Circles and triangles: An experimental estimation of indifference lines in the Marschak-Machina triangle. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 3:1990;279-306.
16. Hey J. D., Orme C. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica. 62:1994;1291-1326.
17. Johnson E. J., Meyer R. J. Compensatory choice models of noncompensatory processes: The effect of varying context. Journal of Consumer Research. 11:1984;528-541.
18. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 47:1979;263-291.
19. MacCrimmon K. R. Descriptive and normative implications of the decision-tree postulates. Risk and uncertainty. 1968a;Macmillan, London/New York. p. 3-23.
20. MacCrimmon, K. R. 1968b, Decision making among multiple-attitude alternatives: A survey and consolidated approach, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica.
21. Maple V (Release 4) [computer software, 1997, Bonn, International Thomson Publishing.
22. Mas-Colell, A. Whinston, M. D. Green, J. R. 1995, Microeconomic theory, New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press.
23. Mintzberg H., Raisinghani D., Théreêt A. The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly. 21:1976;246-275.
24. Mitchell T. R., Beach L. R. Do I love thee? Let me count...." Toward an understanding of intuitive and automatic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 47:1990;1-20.
25. Montgomery H. Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making. Humphreys P., Svenson O., Vári A. Analyzing and aiding decision processes. 1983;343-369.
26. Montgomery H., Svenson O. On decision rules and information processing strategies for choices among multiattribute alternatives. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 17:1976;283-291.
27. Nisbett R. E., Wilson T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review. 84:1977;231-259.
28. Nitzsch R von, Weber M. The effect of attribute ranges on weights in multiattribute utility measurements. Management Science. 39:1993;937-943.
29. Payne J. W. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 16:1976;366-387.
30. Payne J. W. Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin. 92:1982;382-402.
31. Payne J. W., Bettman E. J., Johnson E. J. The adaptive decision maker. 1993;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Potter R. E., Beach L. R. Decision making when the acceptable options become unavailable. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 57:1994a;468-483.
33. Potter R. E., Beach L. R. Imperfect information in pre-choice screening of options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 59:1994b;313-329.
34. Russo J. E. The value of unit price information. Journal of Marketing Research. 14:1977;193-201.
35. Russo J. E., Dosher B. A. Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 9:1983;676-696.
36. Selten R. Properties of a measure of predictive success. Mathematical Social Sciences. 21:1991;153-167.
37. Shugan S. M. The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research. 7:1980;99-111.
38. Simon H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 69:1955;99-118.
39. Starmer C., Sugden R. Probability and juxtaposition effects: An experimental investigation of the common ratio effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2:1989;159-178.
40. Svenson O. Process descriptions of decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 23:1979;86-112.
41. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 5:1992;297-323.
42. Tversky A., Sattah S. Preference trees. Psychological Review. 86:1979;542-573.
43. Tversky A., Sattah S., Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychological Review. 95:1988;371-384.
44. Van Zee E. H., Paluchowski T. F., Beach L. R. The effects of screening and task partitioning upon evaluations of decision options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 5:1992;1-23.
45. Wright P., Barbour F. Phased decision strategies: Sequels to an initial screening. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences. 6:1977;91-109.