Symbols presentation modality as a determinant of gambling behavior

Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

Volumn 136, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 443-448

  Ladouceur, Robert ^a   Sévigny, Serge ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Gambling; Modality of presentation; Video lottery terminal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECREATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUEBEC; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 0039490211     PISSN: 00223980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223980209604170     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Côté, D., Caron, A., Aubert, J., Desrochers, V., & Ladouceur, R. (2001). Near wins prolong gambling on a video lottery terminal. Paper submitted for publication.
2. Coventry, K. R., & Norman, A. C. (1998). Arousal, erroneous verbalizations and the illusion of control during a computer-generated gambling task. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 629-645.
3. Delfabro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (1999). Poker-machine gambling: An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 425-439.
4. Delfabro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (2000). Predictors of irrational thinking in regular slot machine gamblers. The Journal of Psychology, 134, 117-128.
5. Dickerson, M. G., Hinchy, J., England, S. L., Fabre, J., & Cunningham, R. (1992). On the determinants of persistent gambling behaviour in high-frequency poker machine players. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 237-248.
6. Griffiths, M. D. (1991). The psychology of the near miss in fruit machine gambling. Journal of Psychology, 125, 347-357.
7. Griffiths, M. D. (1993). A study of the cognitive activity of fruit machine players. In W. R. Eadington & J. A. Cornelius (Eds.), Gambling behavior and problem gambling (pp. 85-110). Reno, NV: Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming.
8. Griffiths, M. D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351-369.
9. Griffiths, M. D. (1999). The psychology of the near-miss (revisited): A comment on Delfabro & Winefield (1999). British Journal of Psychology, 90, 441-445.
10. Ladouceur, R., & Dubé, D. (1997). Monetary incentive and erroneous perceptions in american roulette, Psychology, 34, 27-32.
11. Ladouceur, R., & Walker, M. (1996). A cognitive perspective on gambling. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Trends in cognitive therapy and behavioural therapies (pp. 89-120). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
12. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.
13. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184-1188.
14. Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. New York: Wiley.
15. Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near-miss. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 32-39.
16. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
17. Strickland, L. H., & Grote, F. W. (1967). Temporal presentation of winning symbols and slot-machine playing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 10-13.
18. Volberg, R. A., & Steadman, H. J. (1988). Refining prevalence estimates of pathological gambling. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 502-505.