Developing Educational Materials for Teaching Diabetes Standards of Care to Home Care Nurses

The Diabetes Educator

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 712-728

  Jones, Phyllis M ^a   Clark, Lucinda L ^b  

^a Western Pennsylvania ^*  (United States)

^b Visiting Nurses Association Western Pennsylvania   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOOK; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; CURRICULUM; DIABETES MELLITUS; DOCUMENTATION; EDUCATION; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; STANDARD; TEACHING;

COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; CURRICULUM; DIABETES MELLITUS; DOCUMENTATION; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING RECORDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; TEACHING MATERIALS; TEXTBOOKS;

EID: 0039490197     PISSN: 01457217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014572170202800512     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Harris MD, Dugan M. Evaluating the quality of home care services using patient outcome data. Home Healthcare Nurse. 1996;14:463-468.
2. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Nurs Manage. 1997;28:49-54.
3. McCormick K, Renner AL, Mayes R, Regan J, Greenburg M. The federal and private sector roles in the development of minimum data sets and core health data elements. Comput Nurs. 1997;5:S23-S32.
4. Wilson A. The quest for accountability. Caring Magazine. 1996;XV(6):24-28.
5. Oerman MH, Huber D. Patient outcomes: a measure of nursing's value. Am J Nurs. 1999;99:40-47.
6. Clark LL. Incorporating OASIS into the Visiting Nurses Association. Outcomes Manage Nurs Pract. 1998;2:24-28.
7. Bloomgarden ZT. Im-provement of the quality of diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:457-460.
8. Davidson MB. Diabetes research and diabetes care: where do we stand? Diabetes Care. 1998;21:2152-2160.
9. The CDC Diabetes in Managed Care Work Group. Exploring and expanding the research agenda for diabetes in managed care: a report of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Managed Care Workshop. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1734-1738.
10. American Diabetes Association. Application Manual for the Provider Recognition Program. Alexandria, Va: American Diabetes Association; 1997.
11. American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations 2001. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(suppl 1): S33-S43.
12. McGreevey C, Nadzam D, Corbin L. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations’ indicator measurement system. Comput Nurs. 1997; 15(suppl):587-593.
13. Mefford J. Order in a new era: outcome documentation. Caring Magazine. 1996;XV::18-23.
14. Hirsch IB, How to Get Great Diabetes Care. Alex-andria, Va. American Diabetes Association; 1996.
15. American Diabetes Association. Get your diabetes outcomes card. Diabetes Forecast. 2001; 54:89-89.
16. Walker EA. Characteristics of the adult learner. Diabetes Educ. 1999; 25(suppl): 16-24.
17. De Tornyay R, Thompson MA. Developing and using modules for instruction. In: De Tornyay R, Thompson MA, eds. Strat-egies for Teaching Nursing. 3rd ed. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers; 1987:207-240.
18. Geraci EP. Computers in home care: application of change theory. Comput Nurs. 1997;15:199-203.
19. Iowa Intervention Project. Proposal to bring nursing into the information age. Image: J Nurs Scholarship. 1997;29:275-281.
20. Saba VK. Why the home health care classification is a recognized nursing nomenclature. Comput Nurs. 1997;15:S69-S76.
21. DOC Plus [computer program]. Version 4.2. Springfield, Mo: Management Software, Inc; 1999.