Considering the witness in interviews

Psycoloquy

Volumn 7, Issue , 1996, Pages

  Douglas, Rhonda N ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive interview; Errors; Eyewitness memory; Facilitated recall; Police procedures; Questioning; Recovered memories; Structured interview

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039488983     PISSN: 10550143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Barnier, A.J. & McConkey, K.M. (1992). Reports of real and false memories: The relevance of hypnosis, hypnotizability, and context of memory test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 521-527.
2. Berstein, E.M. & Putnam, F.W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 727-735.
3. Cassel, W.S. & Bjorklund, D.F. (1995). Developmental patterns of eyewitness memory and suggestibility: An ecologically based short-term longitudinal study. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 507-532.
4. Ceci, S.J. & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the Courtroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-439.
6. Crowne, D.P & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
7. Hosch, H. (1994). Individual differences in personality and eyewitness identification. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 328-347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Hyman, I.E., Jr. & Billings, F.J. (1995). Individual differences and the creation of false childhood memories. Manuscript under review.
9. Loftus, E.F., Levidow, B. & Duensing, S. (1992). Who remembers best? Individual differences in memory for events that occurred in a science museum. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 93-107.
10. Memon, A., Bull, R. & Smith, M. (1995). Improving the quality of the police interview: Can training in the use of cognitive techniques help? Policing and Society, 5, 53-68.
11. Memon, A. & Stevenage, S. (1996). Interviewing Witnesses: What Works and What Doesn't? PSYCOLOQUY 7(6) witness-memory.1.memon.
12. Reyna, V.F. (1994). Interference effects in memory and reasoning: A fuzzy-trace theory analysis. In F.N. Dempster & C.J. Brainerd (Eds.), New perspectives on interference and inhibition processes in cognition. San Diego, Academic Press.
13. Schooler, J.W. & Loftus, E.F. (1993). Multiple mechanisms mediate individual differences in eyewitness accuracy and suggestibility. In J.M. Pucket & H.W. Reese (Eds.), Mechanisms of everyday cognition (pp. 177-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Suengas, A.G. & Johnson, M.K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 103, 377-389.
15. Tellegen, A. & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("Absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268-277.
16. Wilson, S.C. & Barber, T.X. (1978). The Creative Imagination Scale as a measure of hypnotic responsiveness: Applications to experimental and clinical hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 20, 235-249.