The ombudsman revisited: Thirty years of Hawaiian experience

Public Administration Review

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 24-41

  Hill, Larry B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039486051     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6210.00152     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andersen, Stanley V. 1973. Comparing Classical and Executive Ombudsmen in the United States. In Executive Ombudsmen in the United States, edited by Alan J. Wyner, 305-15. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of Governmental Studies.
2. Council of State Governments. 1997. State Leadership Directory: Directory III, Administrative Officials. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
3. Dolan, Paul. 1969. Pseudo-Ombudsmen. National Civic Review 58 (7): 297-301, 306.
4. Elwood, Brian. 1996. How to Harmonize General Ombudsman Activities with those Related to Specialized Ombudsmen. Paper presented at the International Ombudsmen's Conference, October 21, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
5. Fisher, Roger, and William Ury. 1981. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Futter, Victor. 1990. An Answer to the Public Perception of Corporations: A Corporate Ombudsperson? Business Lawyer 46(1): 29-56.
7. Gadlin, Howard. 2000. The Ombudsman: What's in a Name? Negotiation Journal 16 (1): 37-48.
8. Gormley, William T., Jr. 1996. Counterbureaucracies in Theory and Practice. Administration and Society 29 (3): 275-98.
9. Gwyn, William B. 1983. The Investigations of Ombudsmen. In International Handbook of the Ombudsman: Evolution and Present Function, edited by Gerald E. Caiden, 81-90. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
10. Harvard Journal of Legislation. 1965. A State Statute to Create the Office of Ombudsman. 2 (June): 213-38.
11. Hawaii. 1993 Replacement. Revised Statutes. The Ombudsman. Vol 2, title 8, ch. 96.
12. Hill, Larry B. 1974. Institutionalization, the Ombudsman, and Bureaucracy. American Political Science Reviewed (3): 1075-85.
13. _. 1976. The Model Ombudsman: Institutionalizing New Zealand's Democratic Experiment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. _. 1986. The Ombudsman and Bureaucratic Reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28-31, Washington, DC.
15. Kaufman, Herbert. 1969. Administrative Decentralization and Political Power. Public Administration Review 29 (1): 3-15.
16. Rosegg, Peter. 1992. State Ombudsman's Office. Sunday Star-Bulletin and Advertiser, May 3.
17. Rowe, Mary, and Dean M. Gottehrer. 1997. Similarities and Differences Between Public and Private Sector Ombudsmen. Working paper prepared for the spring meeting of the American Bar Association, Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, April 18, Washington, DC.
18. Singer, Linda. 1990. Settling Disputes: Conflict Resolution in Business, Families, and the Legal System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20. Wyner, Alan J. 1973. Executive Ombudsmen, and Criticisms of Contemporary American Public Bureaucracy. In Executive Ombudsmen in the United States, edited by Alan J. Wyner, 3-15. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of Governmental Studies.