La mise en évidence textuelle: D'où venons-nous et où allons-nous?

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 236-263

  Simard, Daphnée ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039483061     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.59.2.236     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. Dans R. Schmidt (réd.), Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition (p. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
2. Bain, A. (1855). The senses and the intellect. London: Longman Green.
3. Bernhardt, E. (1996). Reading development in a second language. Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. (Version originale publiée en 1991.)
4. Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language acquisition. Language Learning, 28, 69-84.
5. Bourguignon, C., et Candelier, M. (1984). Réflexion guidée sur la langue maternelle et apprentissage d'une langue étrangère, Compte rendu d'une expérimentation. Les langues modernes, 78, 147-165.
6. Bourguignon, C., et Candelier, M. (1988). La place de la langue maternelle dans la construction par lélève des notions grammaticales requises pour l'apprentissage d'une langue étrangère. Compte rendu d'une expérimentation. Les langues modernes, 82, 19-34.
7. Broadbent, D.E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
8. Broadbent, D.E. (1962) Attention and the perception of speech. Scientific American, 206, 143-151.
9. Brown, T. (1820). Lectures on the philosophy of the human mind. Edinburgh: James Ballantyne and Co.
10. Candelier, M. (1998). L'éveil aux langues à l'école primaire: le programme européen Evlang. Dans L. Dabène (ré.), De la didactique des langues à la didactique du plurilinguisme. Hommage à Louise Dabène (p. 299-308). Grenoble, France: CDL-LIDILEM.
11. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-496.
12. Doughty, C., et Williams, J. (1998). Issues and terminology. Dans C. Doughty et J. Williams (réd.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (p. 1-12). New-York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. Ellis, N., et Laporte, N. (1997). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. Dans A. de Groot et J. Kroll (réd.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (p. 53-83). Mahaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Ellis, R. (1991). Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
15. Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223-236.
16. Fotos, S.S. (1993). Consciousness-raising through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction. Applied Linguistics, 14, 385-407.
17. Fotos, S.S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 223-351.
18. Fotos, S.S. (1995). Options for combining grammar teaching and communicative language approaches. Senshu University Journal of Foreign Language Education, 23, 3-24.
19. Fotos, S.S. (1998). Shifting the focus on forms to form in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 52, 301-307.
20. Fotos, S.S., et Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605-628.
21. Hershberger, W. (1964). Self-evaluational responding and typographical cueing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(5), 288-296.
22. Hershberger, W.A., et Terry, D.F. (1965). Typographical cueing in conventional and programmed texts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 55-60.
23. Jersild, A. (1929). Primacy, recency, frequency, and vividness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 58-70.
24. Jourdenais, R. (2001). Cognition, instruction and protocol analysis. Dans P. Robinson (réd.), Cognition and second language instruction (p. 354-375). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Jourdenais, R. (1998). The effect of textual enhancement on the acquisition of the Spanish preterit and imperfect. Thèse inédite, Georgetown University.
26. Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., et Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis. Dans R. Schmidt (réd.), Attention and awareness in second language learning (Technical Report 9) (p. 183-216). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
27. Klare, G.R., Marby, J.E., et Gustafson, L.M. (1955). The relationship of patterning (underlining) to immediate retention and to acceptability of technical material. Journal of Applied Psychology, 39, 40-42.
28. Krashen, S. (1976). Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 157-168.
29. Leeman, J., Arteagoitia, I., Fridman, B., et Doughty, C. (1995). Integrating attention to form with meaning: Focus on form in content based Spanish instruction. Dans R. Schmidt (réd.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (p. 217-258). Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
30. Leow, R. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
31. Leow, R. (1998). Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin et Villa's (1994) fine-grained analysis. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 133-159.
32. Leow, R. (1999). The role of attention in second/foreign language classroom research: Methodological issues. Advances in Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 60-71.
33. Leow, R. (2001). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2?: An on-line and off-line study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84, 496-509.
34. Lightbown, P. (1991). What have we here? Some observation on the role of instruction in second language acquisition. Dans R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood-Smith, et M. Swain (réd.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Fearch (p. 197-212). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
35. Lightbown, P.M., et Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feed-back in communicative language teaching: Effect on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
36. Nassaji, H. (1999). Towards integrating form-focused instruction and communicative interaction in the second language classroom: Some pedagogical possibilities. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 385-402.
37. Norris, J., et Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
38. Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-258.
39. Posner, M., et Petersen, S.E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
40. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. Dans P. Robinson (réd.), Cognition and second language instruction (p. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 59-68.
42. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118-132.
43. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
44. Sheen, R. (1996). The advantage of exploiting contrastive analysis in teaching and learning a foreign language. IRAL, XXXIV, 183-197.
45. Shook, J.D. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input to intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57-93.
46. Silamy, N.P. (1983). Dictionnaire usuel de psychologie. Paris: Bordas.
47. re secondaire. Thèse inédite, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
48. Simard, D., et Wong, W. (2001). Alertness, orientation and detection: The conceptualization of attentional functions in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 103-124.
49. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.
50. Spada, N., et Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in the L2 classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-221.
51. Spada, N., et Lightbown, P. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 1-22.
52. Tomasello, M., et Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The Garden Path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 385-395.
53. Tomlin, R., et Villa, H. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
54. Van Burskirk, W.L. (1932). An experimental study of vividness in learning and retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 563-573.
55. VanPatten, B. (1994). Evaluating the role of consciousness in the second language acquisition: Terms, linguistic features and research methodology. AILA Review, 11, 27-36.
56. VanPatten, B. (2000). Textual enhancement research: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Communication présentée au congrès annuel de l'American Association of Applied Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada.
57. VanPatten, B., et Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 45-57.
58. von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychologie Forschung, 18, 299-342.
59. Wallace, W.P. (1965). Review of historical, empirical, and theoretical status of the von Restorff phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 410-424.
60. White, L., Spada, N. Lightbown, P., et Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416-432.
61. White, J. (1996). An input enhancement study with ESL children: Effects on the acquisition of possessive determiners. Thèse inédite, Université McGill, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
62. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. Dans C. Doughty et J. Williams (réd.), Focus on form in second language classroom acquisition (p. 91-128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Williams, J. (1995). Focus on form in communicative language teaching. TESOL Journal, 4, 12-16.
64. Wong, W. (2000). The effects of textual enhancement and simplified input on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Thèse inédite, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
65. Wong, W., et Simard, D. (1999). Textual enhancement as input enhancement: A review of the research. Texte inédit.