The ambiguity thesis versus Kripke's defence of Russell

Mind and Language

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 371-387

  Ramachandran, Murali ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039470093     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00052.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bach, K. 1987: Thought and Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Davies, M. 1981: Meaning, Quantification and Necessity. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3. Donnellan, K. 1966: Reference and Definite Descriptions. Philosophical Review, 75, 281-304.
4. Geach, P. 1962: Reference and Generality. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5. Kaplan, D. 1977: Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog et al. (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press, 1989.
6. Kripke, S. 1979: Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference. In P.A. French et al. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7. Kripke, S. 1980: Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
8. Neale, S. 1990: Descriptions. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
9. Ramachandran, M. 1995: Methodological Reflections on Two Kripkean Strategies. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, XCV, 67-81.
10. Recanati, F. 1989: Referential/Attributive: A Contextualist Proposal. Philosophical Studies, 56, 217-49.
11. Recanati, F. 1993: Direct Reference: From Language to Thought: Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
12. Russell, B. 1959: Mr. Strawson on Referring. In his My Philosophical Development. London: Allen and Uriwin. Page references apply to the Routledge edition, 1995, 175-80.
13. Sainsbury, R.M. 1979: Russell. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.