A 2D Analysis of the Influence of Artificial Viscosity Terms on Solutions of the Euler Equations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 103-120

  Efraimsson, Gunilla ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VISCOSITY; WIND TUNNELS;

2D ANALYSIS; ARTIFICIAL VISCOSITY; DISCRETE LINEAR MODEL; EULER'S EQUATION; LINEAR ANALYSIS; LINEAR MODEL EQUATIONS; NEIGHBOURHOOD; TEST CASE; VISCOSITY MODELING; WIND TUNNEL WITH A STEP;

EULER EQUATIONS;

EID: 0039466657     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1997.5828     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson J. D. Modern Compressible Fluid Flow. 1990;McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. Casper J., Atkins H. L. A finite-volume high-order ENO scheme for two-dimensional hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 106:1993;62.
3. Courant R., Friedrichs K. O. Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves. 1948;Interscience, New York.
4. Davis S. F. A rotational biased upwind difference scheme for the Euler equations. J. Comput. Phys. 56:1984;65.
5. H. Deconinck, C. Hirsch, J. Peuteman, 1986, Characteristic decomposition methods for the multidimensional Euler equations, 10th Int. Conf. on Num. Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Beijing, 1986, 216.
6. Efraimsson G., Kreiss G. A note on the effect of artificial viscosity on solutions of conservation laws. Appl. Numer. Math. 21:1996;155.
7. P. Eliasson, 1993, Dissipation Mechanisms and Multigrid Solutions in a Multiblock Solver for Compressible Flow, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
8. Goodman J. B., LeVeque R. J. On the accuracy of stable schemes for 2D scalar conservation laws. Math. Comput. 45:1985;15.
9. Harten A. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 49:1983;357.
10. Harten A., Lax P. D., van Leer B. On upstream differencing and Godunov-type methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Rev. 25:1983;35.
11. LeVeque R. J. High resolution finite volume methods on arbitrary grids via wave propagation. J. Comput. Phys. 78:1988;36.
12. Levy D. W., Powell K. G., van Leer B. Use of a rotated Riemann solver for the two-dimensional Euler equations. J. Comput. Phys. 106:1993;201.
13. Majda A. Compressible Fluid Flow and Systems of Conservation Laws in Several Space Variables. 1984;Springer-Verlag, New York/Berlin.
14. Osher S. Riemann solvers, the entropy condition, and difference approximations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21:1984;217.
15. Roe P. L. Discrete models for the numerical analysis of time-dependent multidimensional gas dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 63:1986;458.
16. Sweby P. K. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21:1984.
17. Tadmor E. Numerical viscosity and the entropy condition for conservative difference schemes. Math. Comp. 43:1984;369.
18. Wilkinson J. H. The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem. 1965;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
19. Woodward P., Colella P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54:1984;115.
20. Yee H. C. Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their application. J. Comput. Phys. 68:1987;151.