Language, network centrality, and response to crisis in on-line life: A case study on the italian cyber punk computer conference

Information Society

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 117-135

  Paccagnella, Luciano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039400314     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019722498128926     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Baym, N. 1995. The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community, ed. S. Jones. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Berelson, B. 1952. Content analysis in communication research. New York: The Free Press.
3. Cicognani, A. 1996. Which language for Cyberspace? Unpublished working paper, University of Sydney.
4. Danowski, J. A. 1982. Computer-mediated communication: A network-based content analysis using a CBBS conference. Communication yearbook 6:905-924.
5. Danowski, J. A. 1988. Organizational infographics and automated auditing: using computers to unobstrusively gather as well as analyze communication. In Handbook of organizational communication, eds. G. M. Goldhaber and G. A. Barnet. Norwood: Ablex.
6. Danowski, J. A., and Edison-Swift, P. 1985. Crisis effects on intraorga-nizational computer-based communication. In Communication Research 2:251-270.
7. Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., and Sethna, B. 1991. The equalizationphe-nomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decisionmaking groups. In Human Computer Interaction 6:119-146.
8. Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. In Social Network 1:215-239.
9. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., and Schwarz, D. 1992. The dynamics of context-behavior interactions in computer-mediated communication. In Contexts of computer-mediated communication, ed. M. Lea. Hemel Hempstead, Great Britain: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10. Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
11. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. In American Journal of Sociology 78:1360-1380.
12. Hiemstra, G. 1982. Teleconferencing, concern for face, and organizational culture, in Communication yearbook 6:874-904.
13. Hiltz, S. R., and Turoff, M. 1978. The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Jaffe, M., Lee, Y., Huang, L., and Oshagan, H. 1995. Gender, Pseudonyms, and CMC: Masking identities and baring souls. Paper submitted to the 45th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
15. Jones, S. G. ed. 1995. Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CAP: Sage.
16. Kerr, E., and Hiltz, S. R. 1982. Computer-mediated communication systems. Status and evaluation New York: Academic Press.
17. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., and McGuire, T. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. In American Psychologist 10:1123-1134.
18. Knoke, D., andKuklinski, J. H. 1982. Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content analysis. An introduction to his methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Lea, M. ed. 1992. Contexts of computer-mediated communication. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
21. Lea, M., O’Shea, T., Fung, P., and Spears, R. 1992. ‘Flaming’ in computer-mediated communication. Observations, explanations, implications. In Contexts of computer-mediated communication, ed. M. Lea. Hemel Hempstead, Great Britain: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22. Lee, A. S. 1994 Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: an empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quarterly June: 143-157.
23. Lee, G. B. 1996. Addressing anonymous messages in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2:1.
24. Leonard, A. 1996. Bots are hot! in Wired 4.04:114-168.
25. Maltz, T. 1996. Customary law & power in Internet communities. Journal of Computer-MediatedCommunication 2:1.
26. Mantovani, G. 1996a. New communication environments. From everyday to virtual London: Taylor & Francis.
27. Mantovani, G. 1996b. Social context in HCI: A new framework for mental models, cooperation, and communication, in Cognitive Science 20:237-269.
28. Markus, M. 1991. Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media. In Organizations and communication technology, eds. J. Fulk andC. Steinfield. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. McLaughlin, M., Osborne, K., and Smith, C. 1995. Standards of conduct onUsenet. In Cybersociety. Computer-mediated communication and community, ed. S. Jones. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Myers, D. 1987.“Anonymityispartofthemagic”: Individual manipulation of computer-mediated communication context. In Qualitative Sociology 10: 251-266.
31. Parks, M., and Floyd, K. 1996. Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1:4.
32. Penkoff, D., and Katzman, S. 1997. Smile when you say that: Fig-urec accents as gender markers in computer-mediatedcommunication. In Network and net play: Virtual groups on the Internet, eds. F. Sudweeks, M. McLaughlin, and S. Rafaeli. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Pickering, J., and King, J. L. 1992. Hardwiring weak ties: Individual and institutional issues in computer mediated communication. In Proceedings of the conference on computer supported cooperative work, eds. J. Turner and R. Kraut. New York: ACM Press.
34. Rafaeli, S., and Sudweeks, F. 1997. Interactivity on the Nets. In Network and net play: Virtual groups on the Internet, eds. F. Sudweeks, M. McLaughlin, and S. Rafaeli. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35. Reid, E. 1991. Electropolis: Communication and community on internet relay chat. Unpublished dissertation, University of Melbourne.
36. Rice, R. 1982. Communication networking in computer-conferencing systems: A longitudinal study of group roles and system structure. Communication yearbook 6:925-944.
37. Rice, R. 1989. Issues and concepts in research on computer-mediated communication systems. Communication yearbook 12:436-476.
38. Rice, R., andBarnett, G. 1986. Group communication networking in an information environment: Applying metric multidimensional scaling. Communication yearbook 9:315-337.
39. Rice, R., andLove, G. 1987. Electronic emotion. Socioemotionalcon-tent in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research 1:85-108.
40. Richards, W. 1993. Negopy user’s manual, included in the package Negopy.
41. Rucker, R., Sirius, R. U., and Queen, Mu. 1992. Mondo 2000 user’s guide to the new edge. San Francisco: Harper Collins.
42. Schutz, A. 1962. Collected papers, Vol. I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Nijhoff.
43. Schutz, A., and Luckmann, T. 1973. The structures of the life-world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
44. Scott, J. 1991. Social network analysis. A handbook London: Sage.
45. Smith, M. 1992. Voices from the well: The logic of the virtual commons. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
46. Spears, R., and Lea, M. 1992. Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediatedcommunication. In Contexts of computer-mediated communication, ed. M. Lea. Hemel Hempstead, Great Britain: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
47. Spears, R., and Lea, M. 1994. Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediatedcommunication. Communication Research 21(4):427-459.
48. Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. 1986. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32:1492-1512.
49. Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. 1991. Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Sterling, B. 1992. The hacker crackdown: Law and disorder on the electronic frontier. New York: Bantam.
51. Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Sudweeks, F., and Rafaeli, S.1995.Howdoyougeta hundred strangers to agree? Computer-mediated communication and collaboration. In Computer networking and scholarship in the 21stcentury university, eds. T. M. Harrison and T. D. Stephen. New York: SUNY Press.
53. Sudweeks, F., McLaughlin, M., and Rafaeli, S. eds. 1997. Network and net play: Virtual groups on the Internet Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Thomas, J. 1996. Introduction: A debate about the ethics of fair practices for collecting social science data in cyberspace. In The Information Society 12(2):107-117.
55. Walther, J. B. 1992. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Arelational perspective. In Communication Research 19(1):52-90.
56. Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., and Jackson, D. D. 1967. Pragmatic of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton.
58. Weber, R. P 1985. Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
59. Weiser, M. 1991. The Computer for the 21st century. In Scientific American 265(3):66-75.
60. Wellman, B., and Gulia, M. 1997. Net surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. In Communities in cyberspace, eds. P. Kollock and B. Wellman. Berkeley: University of California Press.