The limits of positivism in social work research

British Journal of Social Work

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1987, Pages 401-416

  Smith, David ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039373405     PISSN: 00453102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Berg, W.E. and Theado, R. (1981) ‘The utilization of evaluative research in social welfare programs’, Social Service Review 55, No. 2, pp. 183–192
2. Berger, J. and Mohr, J. (1975) A Seventh Man, Harmondsworth, Penguin
3. Billis, D. (1982) The fruits of togetherness’, Community Care (22 April), pp. 16–17
4. Brody, S.R. (1976) The Effectiveness of Sentencing, London, HMSO
5. Bulmer, M. (1982) The Uses of Social Research, London, Allen & Unwin
6. Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Chicago, Rand McNally
7. Chin, R. and Benne, K. (1969) ‘General strategies for effecting changes in human systems’, in Bennis, W., Benne, K. and Chin, R. (eds) The Planning of Change, New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston
8. Cohen, S. (1985) Visions of Social Control, London, Polity Press
9. Dunlop, A. (1974) The Approved School Experience, London, HMSO
10. Eagleton, T. (1983) The Function of Criticism, London, Verso
11. Eagleton, T. (1984) Literary Theory, Oxford, Blackwell
12. Eagleton, T. (1986) Against the Grain, London, Verso
13. Empson, W. (1966) Some Versions of Pastoral, Harmondsworth, Penguin
14. England, H. (1986) Social Work as Art, London, Allen & Unwin
15. Eysenck, H J. and Wilson, G.D. (1973) The Experimental Study of Freudian Theory, London, Methuen. •
16. Feyerabend, P. (1975) Against Method, London, Verso
17. Finch, J. (1986) Research and Policy, London, Falmer
18. Folkard, M.S., Smith, D.E. and Smith, D.D. (1976) IMPACT Vol. II—The Results of the Experiment, London, HMSO
19. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish, London, Allen Lane
20. Fowles, AJ. (1978) Prison Welfare–An Account of an Experiment at Liverpool, London, HMSO
21. Heineman, M.B. (1981) ‘The obsolete scientific imperative in social work research’, Social Service Review 55, pp. 371–397
22. Home Office (1984) Statement of National Objectives and Priorities, London, Home Office
23. Jordan, B. (1978) ‘A comment on “Theory and practice in social work”’, British Journal of Social Work 8, pp. 23–25
24. Joyce, L. (1980) ‘Developments in evaluation research’. Journal of Occupational Behaviour 1, pp. 181–190
25. Karabel, J. and Halsey, A.H. (1977) ‘Educational research: a review and an interpretation’, in Karabel, J. and Halsey, A.H. (eds) Power and Ideology in Education, New York, Oxford University Press
26. Keat, R. (1981) The Politics of Social Theory, Oxford, Blackwell
27. Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University Press
28. Lakatos, 1. (1970) ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’, in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge, University Press
29. Marris, P. (1974) Loss and Change, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul
30. Marris, P. and Rein, M. (1967) Dilemmas of Social Reform, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul
31. Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What works? Questions and answers about prison reform’, The Public Interest 10, pp. 22–54
32. Millham, S., Bullock, R. and Cherrett, P. (1975) After Grace-Teeth, London, Chaucer
33. Morgan, G. (1983) (ed.) Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, Beverly Hills, Sage
34. Mulhem, F. (1979) The Moment of ‘Scrutiny’, London, Verso
35. NACRO (1986) Findings from the First Census of Projects Funded under the DHSS IT Initiative, London, NACRO/Juvenile Offenders Team
36. Nuttall, C.P. et al. (1977) Parole in England and Wales, London, HMSO
37. Paley, J. (1986) Review of Social Work as Art, British Journal of Social Work 16, pp. 693–695
38. Patton, M.Q. (1978) Utilization-Focused Evaluation, Beverly Hills, Sage
39. Pease, K. (1984) ‘A five year plan for probation research’, in NAPO, Probation: Direction, Innovation and Change in the I980’s, London, National Association of Probation Officers
40. Pease, K. (1986) ‘The Uses of Research’, paper given to Lancashire Probation Service Staff Conference, 17 April 1986
41. Popper, K.R. (1969) Conjectures and Refutations, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul
42. Raynor, P. (1984) ‘Evaluation with one eye dosed; the empiridst agenda in social work research’, British Journal of Social Work 14, pp. 1–10
43. Raynor, P. (1985) Social Work, Justice and Control, Oxford, Blackwell
44. Rose, G. and Marshall, T.F. (1974) Counselling and School Social Work, London, John Wiley
45. Ross, S. (1984) ‘The sacred cow of IT’, Community Care (16 February), pp. 24–26
46. Shaw, M. (1974) Social Work in Prison, London, HMSO
47. Sheldon, B. (1978a) ‘Theory and practice in social wotk’. British Journal of Social Work 8, pp. 1–22
48. Sheldon, B. (1978b) Letter to the Editor, British Journal of Social Work 8, pp. 219–220
49. Sheldon, B. (1982) ‘A measure of success’, Social Work Today 13, No. 21, pp. 8–11
50. Sheldon, B. (1983) ‘The use of single case experimental designs in social work research’, British Journal of Social Work 13, pp. 477–500
51. Sheldon, B. (1984) ‘Evaluation with one eye dosed: the empiricist agenda in social work research—a reply to Peter Raynor’, British Journal of Social Work 14, pp. 635–637
52. Sheldon, B. (1986) ‘Social work effectiveness experiments: review and implications’, British Journal of Social Work 16, pp. 223–242
53. Sindair, I. (1971) Hostels for Probationers, London, HMSO
54. Truax, C.B. and Carkhuff, R.R. (1967) Towards Effective Counselling and Psychotherapy, Chicago, Aldine
55. Weiss, C.H. (1972) ‘Utilization of evaluation’, in Weiss, C.H. (ed.), Evaluating Action Programs, Boston, Allyn & Bacon
56. Weiss, C.H. and Bucuvalas, M J. (1980) Social Science Research and Decision Making, New York, Columbia Unviersity Press