Photoabsorption probability for a system governed by a time-dependent Hamiltonian through the (t,t′) formalism

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 106, Issue 17, 1997, Pages 6839-6847

  Pang, John W ^a   Neuhauser, Daniel ^a   Moiseyev, Nimrod ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039361450     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.474057     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. E. J. Heller, Act. Chem. Res. 14, 368 (1981). For earlier developments, see R. G. Gordon, Adv. Magn. Reson. 3, 1 (1968).
2. E. J. Heller, Act. Chem. Res. 14, 368 (1981). For earlier developments, see R. G. Gordon, Adv. Magn. Reson. 3, 1 (1968).
3. See, for example, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Optical Society, Quebec, Canada, 1995. Also see: Atoms in Intense Laser Fields, edited by Mihai Gavrila (Academic, Boston, 1992).
4. See, for example, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Optical Society, Quebec, Canada, 1995. Also see: Atoms in Intense Laser Fields, edited by Mihai Gavrila (Academic, Boston, 1992).
5. N. Ben-Tal, N. Moiseyev, R. Kosloff, and C. Cerjan, J. Phys. B 26, 1445 (1993).
6. One indication is that there seem to be no interference peaks in the ATI spectrum, which is equispaced - pointing at a single initial Floquet state.
7. T. S. Ho, S. I. Chu, and J. U. Tietz, Chem. Phys. Lett. 96, 464 (1983).
8. M. Dorr, R. M. Potvliege, D. Proulx, and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 44, 574 (1991).
9. U. Peskin and N. Moiseyev, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 4590 (1993).
10. J. S. Howland, Math. Ann. 207, 315 (1974); Indiana University Math. J. 28, 471 (1979).
11. J. S. Howland, Math. Ann. 207, 315 (1974); Indiana University Math. J. 28, 471 (1979).
12. P. Pfiefer and R. D. Levine, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 5512 (1983).
13. W. P. Reinhardt, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33, 223 (1982); B. R. Junker, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 18, 207 (1982); N. Moiseyev, Isr. J. Chem. 31, 311 (1991).
14. W. P. Reinhardt, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33, 223 (1982); B. R. Junker, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 18, 207 (1982); N. Moiseyev, Isr. J. Chem. 31, 311 (1991).
15. W. P. Reinhardt, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33, 223 (1982); B. R. Junker, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 18, 207 (1982); N. Moiseyev, Isr. J. Chem. 31, 311 (1991).
16. H. J. Korsch and N. Moiseyev, Phys. Rev. A. 42, 4045 (1990); Isr. J. Chem. 30, 107 (1990).
17. H. J. Korsch and N. Moiseyev, Phys. Rev. A. 42, 4045 (1990); Isr. J. Chem. 30, 107 (1990).
18. D. Neuhauser and M. Baer, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 4351 (1989).
19. G. Jolicard and E. J. Austin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 121, 106 (1985); D. Neuhauser, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 4927 (1991).
20. G. Jolicard and E. J. Austin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 121, 106 (1985); D. Neuhauser, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 4927 (1991).
21. 1, see, e.g., Ref. 12.
22. N. Moiseyev, in Lecture Notes in Physics, edited by E. Brandas and N. Elander (Springer, New York, 1984), Vol. 211; N. Moiseyev, P. R. Certain, and F. Weinhold, Mol. Phys. 36, 1613 (1978).
23. N. Moiseyev, in Lecture Notes in Physics, edited by E. Brandas and N. Elander (Springer, New York, 1984), Vol. 211; N. Moiseyev, P. R. Certain, and F. Weinhold, Mol. Phys. 36, 1613 (1978).
24. L(t′)|.
25. E. Haller, L. S Cederbaum, and W. Domke, Mol. Phys. 41, 1291 (1980); G. Moro and J. H. Freed, J. Phys. Chem. 84, 2837 (1980); R. A. Friesner, J. P. Brunet, R. E. Wyatt, and C. Leforestier, J. Supercomp. Appl. 1, 1 (1987); O. Kollin, C. Leforestier, and N. Moiseyev, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 6836 (1988).
26. E. Haller, L. S Cederbaum, and W. Domke, Mol. Phys. 41, 1291 (1980); G. Moro and J. H. Freed, J. Phys. Chem. 84, 2837 (1980); R. A. Friesner, J. P. Brunet, R. E. Wyatt, and C. Leforestier, J. Supercomp. Appl. 1, 1 (1987); O. Kollin, C. Leforestier, and N. Moiseyev, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 6836 (1988).
27. E. Haller, L. S Cederbaum, and W. Domke, Mol. Phys. 41, 1291 (1980); G. Moro and J. H. Freed, J. Phys. Chem. 84, 2837 (1980); R. A. Friesner, J. P. Brunet, R. E. Wyatt, and C. Leforestier, J. Supercomp. Appl. 1, 1 (1987); O. Kollin, C. Leforestier, and N. Moiseyev, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 6836 (1988).
28. E. Haller, L. S Cederbaum, and W. Domke, Mol. Phys. 41, 1291 (1980); G. Moro and J. H. Freed, J. Phys. Chem. 84, 2837 (1980); R. A. Friesner, J. P. Brunet, R. E. Wyatt, and C. Leforestier, J. Supercomp. Appl. 1, 1 (1987); O. Kollin, C. Leforestier, and N. Moiseyev, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 6836 (1988).
29. (a) R. Kosloff, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 2087 (1988);
30. (b) U. Peskin, R. Kosloff, and N. Moiseyev, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 8849 (1994);
31. (c) D. Neuhauser, ibid. 93, 2611 (1990).
32. H. Tal-Ezer, R. Kosloff, and C. Cerjan, J. Comp. Phys. 100, 179 (1992); S. M. Auerbach and C. Leforestier, Comp. Phys. Commun. 78, 55 (1993).
33. H. Tal-Ezer, R. Kosloff, and C. Cerjan, J. Comp. Phys. 100, 179 (1992); S. M. Auerbach and C. Leforestier, Comp. Phys. Commun. 78, 55 (1993).
34. D. K. Hoffman, M. Arnold, W. Zhu, and D. J. Kouri, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 1124 (1993).
35. V. A. Mandelshtam and H. S. Taylor, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 2903 (1995).
36. The extraction of Floquet states by filtering the (t,t′) wave function is independently pursued by J. Wells - we thank him for correspondence on this fact.
37. D. Neuhauser, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5076 (1994); M. R. Wall and D. Neuhauser, ibid. 102, 8011 (1995); J. W. Pang and D. Neuhauser, Chem. Phys. Lett. 252, 173 (1996); see also Ref. 18c.
38. D. Neuhauser, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5076 (1994); M. R. Wall and D. Neuhauser, ibid. 102, 8011 (1995); J. W. Pang and D. Neuhauser, Chem. Phys. Lett. 252, 173 (1996); see also Ref. 18c.
39. D. Neuhauser, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5076 (1994); M. R. Wall and D. Neuhauser, ibid. 102, 8011 (1995); J. W. Pang and D. Neuhauser, Chem. Phys. Lett. 252, 173 (1996); see also Ref. 18c.
40. -15.
41. The energy spectrum in the Floquet problem is infinitely large (and periodic) so that the choice of the energy levels by their order in the region [-0.5,0.5] is arbitrary (and not necessarily related to the zero-field order). Thus, energy levels "O" and "9"are really neighboring in energies, which leads to the corresponding peak in Figure 1. The peaks in the graph are similar when 14 basis functions are used.