Balance and sacred cows: A reply to Reutzel

Reading Teacher

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 94-95

  Welna, Louis D ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039337298     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Barnes, B. (1996/1997). But teacher you went right on: A perspective on Reading Recovery. The Reading Teacher, 50, 284-292.
2. Center, Y., Wheldall K., Freeman L., Outhred, L., & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240-263.
3. Dudley-Marling, C., & Murphy, S. (1995). A political critique of remedial reading programs: The example of Reading Recovery. The Reading Teacher, 50, 460-468.
4. Elley, W.B. (1994). The IEA study of reading literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
5. Guthrie, J. (1981). Reading in New Zealand: Achievement and volume. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 6-17.
6. Hiebert, E.H. (1994). Reading Recovery in the United States: What differences does it make to an age cohort? Educational Researcher, 23(9), 15-25.
7. Nicholson, T. (1991). Do children read better in context or in lists? A classic study revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 444-450.
8. Rasinski, T. (1995a). On the effects of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 264-270.
9. Rasinski, T. (1995b). Reply to Pinnell, Deford, Lyons, and Bryk. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 276-277.
10. Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional interventions for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996.