Multiple representation for understanding data structures

Computers and Education

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-11

  Hanciles, Biffah ^b   Shankararaman, Venky ^a   Munoz, Jose ^a  

^a EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Beginning undergraduates in computing; Computer based learning; Data structures; Multiple representations; Non computing graduates

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039327987     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1315(97)00028-6     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. du Boulay, B. and Sothcott, C., Computer's teaching programming: an introductury survey of the field. In Artificial Intelligence and Education, Vol. 1, ed. R. W. Lawler and M. Yazdani. Ablex, 1987.
2. Whale, G., DRUIDS: tools for understanding data structures and algorithms. In The 1994 IEEE First International Conference on Multi-media Engineering Education Proceedings, ed. M. Aldeen. IEEE, New York, 1994, pp. 403-407.
3. Paivio, A., The empirical case for dual coding. In Imagery, Memory and Cognition: Essay in Honor of Allen Pavio, ed. J. C. Yuille. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.
4. Paivio, A. Dual coding theory. In Mental Representation: A Dual Coding Approach, ed. A. Paivio. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 53-83.
5. Paivio, A., Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1991, 45(3), 255-287.
6. Chan Lin, L.-J., Okey, J. R. and Prestwood, A. K., Computer graphics - motivation and learning in an interactive science lesson. In Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference on Computers in Education (Applications of Intelligent Computer Technologies), ed. T.-W. Chan. Nat. Central Univ, Taipei, Taiwan, 1993, pp. 224-229.
7. Larkin, J. and Simon, H. A., Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 1987, 11, 65-99.
8. Cheng, P. C-H., Multiple intractive structural representation systems for education. In AI-ED93 Proceedings of the Workshop on Graphical Representations, Reasoning and Communication, ed. R. Cox, M. Petre, P. Brna, and J. Lee. The University of Edinburgh, 1993, pp. 25-28.
9. Hall, N. and Ohlsson, S., A theory of manipulatives in arithmetic learning. In The International Conference on the Learning Sciences Proceedings of the 1991 Conference, ed. L. Birnbaum. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, U.S.A., 1991.
10. Urden, L., Improving learning ability in computer-aided education. In Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference on Computers in Education (Applications of Intelligent Computer Technologies), ed. T.-W. Chan. Nat. Central Univ, Taipei, Taiwan, 1993, pp. 389-392.
11. Liebrman, H., An example based environment for beginning programmers. In Artificial Intelligence and Education, Vol. 1, ed. R. W. Lawler and M. Yazdani. Ablex, 1987.
12. Paivio, A., Imagery and Verbal Processes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1971.
13. Eskridge, T. C., Continuous analogical learning. In The International Conference on the Learning Sciences Proceedings of the 1991 Conference, ed. L. Birnbaum. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 1991.
14. Dromey, R. G., How to Solve it by Computer. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1982.
15. Littman, D. and Soloway, E., Evaluating ITSs: the cognitive science perspective. In Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ed. M. C. Polson. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1988, pp. 209-242.