Controllability methods for the computation of time-periodic solutions; application to scattering

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 147, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 265-292

  Bristeau, M O ^a   Glowinski, R ^b   Periaux J ^c  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b University of Houston   (United States)

^c DASSAULT AVIATION   (France)

Author keywords

Conjugate gradient; Controllability; Least squares shooting method; Scattering; Time periodic solutions

Indexed keywords

CONJUGATE GRADIENT METHOD; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

BASIC PRINCIPLES; CONJUGATE GRADIENT; EVOLUTION EQUATIONS; GENERAL METHODOLOGIES; LEAST SQUARE; LEAST-SQUARE/SHOOTING METHOD; SCATTERING PROBLEMS; SHOOTING METHODS; TIME DISCRETIZATION; TIME-PERIODIC SOLUTIONS;

CONTROLLABILITY;

EID: 0039243984     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6044     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lasiecka I., Triggiani R. Control Problems for Systems described by Partial Differential Equations and Applications. 97:1987.
2. Auchmuty G., Dean E. J., Glowinski R., Zhang S. C. Control methods for the numerical computation of periodic solutions of autonomous differential equations. Control Problems for Systems described by Partial Differential Equations and Applications. 97:1987;64.
3. M. O. Bristeau, R. Glowinski, J. Périaux, Scattering waves using exact controllability methods, 31st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada.
4. M. O. Bristeau, R. Glowinski, J. Périaux, Using exact controll ability to solve the Helmholtz equation at high wave numbers, Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation, T. KleinmanTh. AngellD. ColtonF. SantosaI. Stakgold, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1993, 113.
5. Glowinski R., Lions J. L. Exact and approximatecontrollability for distributed parameter systems. Acta Numer. 1996;159.
6. M. O. Bristeau, E. J. Dean, R. Glowinski, V. K. Kwok, J. Périaux, Application of exact controllability to the computation of scattering waves, Control Problems in Industry, I. LasieckaB. Morton, Birkhauser, Boston, 1995, 17.
7. G. Auchmuty, Control theoretic methods for the computation of special solutions of differential equations, Computational Sciences for the 21st Century, M. O. BristeauG. EtgenW. FitzgibbonJ. L. LionsJ. PériauxM. F. Wheeler, Wiley, Chichester, 1997, 655.
8. Bardos C., Rauch J. Variational algorithms for the Helmholtzequation using time evolution and artificial boundaries. Asymptotic Anal. 9:1994;101.
9. Morgan J., Hollis S. The existence of periodic solutions toreaction-diffusion equations with periodic data. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 26:1995;1225.
10. M. O. Bristeau, R. Glowinski, J. Périaux, Exact controllability to solve the Helmholtz equation with absorbing boundary conditions, Finite Element Methods, D. KrizekP. NeittaanmakiR. Stenberg, Dekker, New York, 1994, 79.
11. Kleinman R. E., Roach G. F. Boundary integral equations for the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation. SIAM Rev. 16:1974;214.
12. Harari I., Hughes T. J. R. A cost comparison of boundary element and finite element methods for problems of time-harmonic acoustics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 97:1991;77.
13. Ammari H., Nedelec J. C. Couplage éléments finis/équations intégrales pour la résolution des équations de Maxwell en milieu hétérogène. Equations aux Dérivées Partielles et Applications. 1998;19.
14. E. Heikkola, Y. A. Kuznetsov, P. Neittaanmaki, J. Toivanen, Different approximations for the exterior Helmholtz equation: A numerical study, J. Comput. Phys.
15. Lions J. L. Exact controllability, stabilization and perturbation for distributed systems. SIAM Rev. 30:1988;1.
16. Lions J. L. Contrôlabilité Exacte, Perturbation et Stabilisation des Systèmes Distribués. 1:1988.
17. P. L. George, E. Seveno, Génération de Maillages par une Méthode de Type Frontal, 1992.
18. H. Bourouchaki, F. Hecht, E. Saltel, P. L. George, Reasonably efficient Delaunay-based mesh generator in 3 dimensions, Proc. of the 4th Int. Meshing Roundtable, Albuquerque, NM, 1995.
19. J. Erhel, F. Guyomarch, An augmented subspace conjugate gradient, 1997.
20. Mur G. The finite element modeling of three-dimensional electromagnetic fields using edge and nodal elements. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 41:1993;948.
21. Bowman J. J., Senior T. B. A., Uslenghi P. L. E. Electromagnetic and Acoustic Scattering by Simple Shapes. 1987.
22. F. El, Dabaghi, K. Parrott, H. Steve, Proceedings of the3rd Workshop on Approximations and Numerical Methods for the Solution of Maxwell Equations, Wiley, Chichester.
23. Y. Kuznetsov, K. Lipnikov, On the application of fictitious domain and domain decomposition methods for scattering problems on Cray Y-MP C98, Department of Mathematics, University of Nijmegen, December 1995.
24. M. O. Bristeau, V. Girault, R. Glowinski, T. W. Pan, J. Périaux, Y. Xiang, On a fictitious domain method for flow and wave problems, Domain Decomposition Methods in Sciences and Engineering, R. GlowinskiJ. PériauxZ-C. ShiO. Widlund, Wiley, Chichester, 1997, 361.
25. M. O. Bristeau, Exact controllability methods for calculation of 3D time-periodic Maxwell solutions, Computational Science for the 21st Century, M. O. BristeauG. EtgenW. FitzgibbonJ. L. LionsJ. PériauxM. F. Wheeler, Wiley, Chichester, 1997, 492.
26. Berggren M., Glowinski R., Lions J. L. A computationalapproach to controllability issues for flow-related models (I): Pointwise control of the viscous Burgers equation. Internat. J. Comput. Fluid Dynamics. 7:1996;237.
27. Berggren M. Numerical solution of a flow control problem: Vorticity reduction by dynamic boundary action. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19:1998;1024.