Earth Vision 2000: Examining Students' Representations of Complex Data Sets

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 100, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 426-439

  Vellom, R Paul ^a   Pape, Stephen J ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039203604     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17331.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brasell, H. M., & Rowe, M. B. (1993). Graphing skills among high school physics students. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 63–70.
2. DiSessa, A. A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117–160.
3. Eichinger, D., Anderson, C., Pahncsar, A., & David, Y. (1991, April). An illustration of the roles of content knowledge, scientific argument, and social norms in collaborative problem solving. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
4. Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representation of functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 105–121.
5. Gee, J. P. (1991). What is literacy? In C. Mitchell & K. Weiler (eds), Rewriting literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other (pp. 3–11). New York: Bergin & Garvey.
6. Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and without representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361–367.
7. Hiebert, J. (1988). A theory of developing competence with written mathematical symbols. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 333–355.
8. Janvier, C., Girardon, C., & Morand, J. (1993). Mathematical symbols and representations. In P. S. Wilson (ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 79–102). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Mathematica 3.0 [Computer software]. (1998). Champaign, IL: Wolfram Research, Inc.
11. Meira, L. (1995). The microevolution of mathematical representations in children's activity. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 269–313.
12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
14. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15. National Science Teachers Associaton (1992). Scope, sequence, and coordination of secondary school science: The content core. Washington, DC: Author.
16. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Birkenhead, Auckland: Heinemann.
17. Rutherford, F., & Ahlgren, A. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859–882.
19. Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761–784.
20. Vellom, R. P. (1995). Emerging discourses in middle school: A study of individual understanding and group construction of the concepts of mass, volume, and density. Unpublished doctoral dissertation; Michigan State University.