Fish protection technologies: A status report

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 3, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2000, Pages 349-359

  Taft, E P ^a  

^a Alden Research Laboratory Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

316(b); Behavioral barriers; Best technology available; Fish collection; Fish diversion; Fish protections; Water intakes

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039177526     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1462-9011(00)00038-1     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Beak Consultants Inc., 1988. Dunkirk Steam Station Biological Studies - SPDES Permit No. NY0002321; Final Report January-December 1987. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
2. Bengeyfield, W., 1990. Evaluation of an electrical field to divert coho salmon smolts from the penstock intake at Puntledge Generating Station. Prepared by Global Fisheries Consultants Ltd for B.C. Hydro, Vancouver, BC.
3. Breitburg, D.L., Thomas, T.A., 1986. Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant finfish survival study for Baltimore Gas and Electric Company. Final Report. Benedict Estuarine Research Laboratory of Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
4. Brown R.E. The potential of strobe lighting as a cost-effective means for reducing impingement and entrainment. Environmental Science & Policy. 3:2000;S405-S416.
5. Bruggemeyer, V., Cowdrick, D., Durrell, K., 1988. Full-scale operational demonstration of fine mesh screens at power plants. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Fish Protection at Steam and Hydro Plants, San Francisco, CA, October 28-30, 1987. Electric Power Research Institute CS/EA/AP-5663-SR.
6. Carolina Power and Light Company, 1985. Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Cape Fear studies interpretive report; August 1985.
7. Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc., 1985. Biological evaluation of a Ristroph screen at Indian Point Unit 2. Report prepared by Office of Environmental Affairs.
8. Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc., 1994. Evaluation of underwater sound to reduce impingement at the Arthur Kill Station.
9. Davis, R.W., Matousek, J.A., Skelly, M.J., Anderson, M.R., 1988. Biological evaluation of Brayton Point Station Unit 4 angled screen intake. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI); CS/EA/AP-5663-SR.
10. Dunning, D., 1995. Ultrasound deterrence: alewife at a nuclear generating station in New York. In: Carlson, T.J., Popper, A.N. (Eds.), Using Sound to Modify Fish Behavior at Power-Production and Water-Control Facilities: A Workshop. Prepared for US Department of Energy and Bonneville Power Administration, DOE/BP-62611-11.
11. Ecological Analysts Inc., 1977. Preliminary investigations into the use of a continuously operating fine-mesh traveling screen to reduce ichthyoplankton entrainment at India Point Generating Station. Report prepared for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
12. Ecological Analysts Inc., 1979. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a continuously operating fine-mesh traveling screen for reducing ichthyoplankton entrainment at the Indian Point Generating Station. Report prepared for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
13. Ecological Analysts Inc., 1982. A biological evaluation of modified vertical traveling screens. Prepared for Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation.
14. Envirex Inc., 1996. Fish survival enhancement with envirex non-metallic fish baskets and improved fish spray wash design. Envirex, Inc., Waukesha, WI.
15. EPRI, 1986. Assessment of downstream migrant fish protection technologies for hydroelectric application. EPRI Report No. 2694-1. Palo Alto, CA.
16. EPRI, 1992. Evaluation of the Eicher Screen at Elwha Dam: 1990 and 1991 test results. EPRI Report No. TR-101704. Palo Alto, CA.
17. EPRI, 1994a. Biological evaluation of a modular inclined screen for protecting fish at water intakes. EPRI Report No. TR104121. Palo Alto, CA.
18. EPRI, 1994b. Research update on fish protection technologies for water intakes. EPRI Report No. TR-104122. Palo Alto, CA.
19. EPRI, 1996. Evaluation of the Modular Inclined Screen (MIS) at the Green Island Hydroelectric Project: 1995 test results. EPRI Report No. TR-106498. Palo Alto, CA.
20. EPRI, 1998. Evaluation of fish behavioral barriers. EPRI Report No. TR-109483. Palo Alto, CA.
21. EPRI, 1999. Status report on fish protection at cooling water intakes. EPRI Report No. TR-114013. Palo Alto, CA.
22. ESEERCO, 1981a. Laboratory evaluation of fish protection devices at intakes. Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation Research Report EP 8-6, Final Report (May 1981).
23. ESEERCO, 1981b. Laboratory evaluation of fine-mesh screening for the protection of fish larvae at intakes. Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation Research Report EP 8-6, Final Report (July 1981).
24. Fletcher R.I. Flow dynamics and fish recovery experiments: water intake systems. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 119:1990;393-415.
25. GLEC, 1994. Report on fish diversion at Four Mile Dam using strobe lighting and air bubble curtain techniques.
26. Hanson, B.N., Bason, W.H., Beitz, B.E., Charles, K.E., 1978. A practical intake screen which substantially reduces entrainment. In: Fourth National Workshop on Entrainment and Impingement, Chicago, IL, 5 December 1977. Sponsored by Ecological Analysts Inc.
27. Kalmijn, A.J., 1988. Hydrodynamic and acoustic field detection. In: Atema, J., Fay, R.A., Popper, A.N., Tavolga, W.N. (Eds.), Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals. New York, NY.
28. Knudsen F.R., Enger P.S., Sand O. Awareness reactions and avoidance responses to sound in juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Journal of Fish Biology. 40:1992;523-534.
29. Knudsen F.R., Enger P.S., Sand O. Avoidance responses to low frequency sound in downstream migrating Atlantic salmon smolt, Salmo salar. Journal of Fish Biology. 45:1994;227-233.
30. Kuhl, G.M., Mueller, K.N., 1988. Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Environmental Monitoring Program, 1988 Annual Report: Fine Mesh Vertical Traveling Screens Impingement Survival Study. Prepared for Northern States Power Company.
31. Kynard B., O'Leary J. Behavioral guidance of adult American shad using underwater AC electrical and acoustic fields. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fishways '90, Gifu, Japan. 1990.
32. Lifton, W., 1979. Biological aspects of screen testing on the St Johns River, Palatka, Florida. Prepared for Passive Intake Screen Workshop, Chicago, IL, December.
33. Liston C.R., Brockman R., Sackett G., Karp C., Hess L., Johnson P., Hiebert S., Mueller G. Improvements in fish collection facilities at the Federal Tracy Pumping Station. Proceedings of the American Fisheries Society Fish Passage Symposium, American Fisheries Society. 1993.
34. LMS, 1985a. Brayton Point Station Unit No. 4 aquatic biological monitoring program angled screen intake evaluation. Prepared for New England Power Company.
35. LMS, 1985b. Fish protective intake test facility: angled screen diversion study. Report prepared for the Empire State Energy Research Corporation.
36. LMS, 1991. Intake debris screen postimpingement survival evaluation study, Roseton Generating Station, 1990.
37. LMS, 1992. Intake technology review Oswego Steam Station Units 1-6. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (April 1992).
38. LMS, 1996. Effectiveness evaluation of a fine mesh barrier net located at the cooling water intake of the Bowline Point Generating Station. Prepared for Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
39. LMS, 1997. Lovett Generating Station Gunderboom System evaluation program 1996. Prepared for Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
40. Loos, J.L., 1986. Evaluation of benefits to PEPCO of improvements in the barrier net and intake screens at Chalk Point Station Between 1984 and 1985. Prepared for Environmental Affairs Group Water and Land Use Department Potomac Electric Power Company Washington, DC.
41. McCauley, D.J., Montuori, L., Navarro, J.E., Blystra, A.R., 1996. Using strobe lights, air bubble curtains for cost-effective fish diversion. Hydro Review, 42-51.
42. MEM, 1999. Gunderboom waterborne pollutant and debris containment systems. http://www.mackworth.com/gunderboom/.
43. Michaud, D.T., 1981. Wisconsin electric's experience with porous Dike and Leaky Dam Intake Structures on Lake Michigan. In: Dorn, P.B., Johnson, J.T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop of Advanced Intake Technology. San Diego, CA, April 22-24.
44. Michaud D.T., Taft E.P. Recent evaluation of physical and behavioral barriers for reducing fish entrainment at hydroelectric projects in the upper Midwest. Proceeding of the EPRI/DOE Power Generation Impacts on Aquatic Resources Conference, Atlanta, GA. 1999.
45. Murray, L.S., Jinnette, T.S., 1978. Survival of dominant estuarine organisms impinged on fine mesh traveling screens at the Barney M. Davis Power Station. Prepared for Central Power and Light Company.
46. Neitzel, D.A., Abernethy, C.S., Lusty, E.W., 1991. Evaluation of rotating drum screen facilities in the Yakima River Basin, South-Central Washington State. In: Fisheries Bioengineering Symposium. American Fisheries Society Symposium 10.
47. NYSEG, 1990. Somerset aquatic monitoring program - 1989 annual report. Prepared by NYSEG, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation and Auld Environmental Associates.
48. Pearce R.O., Lee R.T. Some design considerations for approach velocities at juvenile salmonid screening facilities. Fisheries Bioengineering Symposium, American Fisheries Society. 10:1991;237-248.
49. Ploskey G.R., Nestler J.M., Weeks G.N., Schilt C. Evaluation of an integrated fish-protection system. Waterpower '95, Proceedings of the International Conference on Waterpower. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY. 1995.
50. Reider, R.H., Johnson, D.D., Brad, Latvaitis P., Gulvas, J.A., Guilfoos, E.R., 1997. Operation and maintenance of the Ludington Pumped Storage Project barrier net. In: Fish Passage Workshop, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, May 6-8, 1997. Sponsored by Alden Research Laboratory, Conte Anadromous Fish Research Laboratory, Electric Power Research Institute, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company. Proceedings available from Alden Research Laboratory, Inc., arlmail@aldenlab.com.
51. Ronafalvy, J.P., Cheesman, R. Roy, Matejek, W.M., 1997. Circulating water traveling screen modifications to improve fish survival and debris handling at Salem Generating Station. In: Fish Passage Workshop, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, May 6-8, 1997. Sponsored by Alden Research Laboratory, Conte Anadromous Fish Research Laboratory, Electric Power Research Institute, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company. Proceedings available from Alden Research Laboratory, Inc., arlmail@aldenlab.com.
52. Ronafalvy J.P. Circulating water traveling screen modifications to improve impinged fish survival and debris handling at Salem Generating Station. Proceedings of the EPRI/DOE Power Generation Impacts on Aquatic Resources Conference, Atlanta, GA. 1999.
53. Smith, H., 1997. Operating history of the Puntledge River Eicher Screen facility. In: Fish Passage Workshop, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, May 6-8, 1997. Sponsored by Alden Research Laboratory, Conte Anadromous Fish Research Laboratory, Electric Power Research Institute, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company. Proceedings available from Alden Research Laboratory, Inc., arlmail@aldenlab.com.
54. Smith L.W., Ferguson D.J. Cleaning and clogging tests of passive intake screens in the Sacramento River, California. Proceedings of the Passive Intake Screen Workshop, Chicago, IL. 1979.
55. Stira, R.J., Robinson, D.A., 1997. Effectiveness of a louver bypass system for downstream passage of Atlantic Salmon smolts and juvenile clupeids in the Holyoke Canal, Connecticut River, Holyoke, Massachusetts. In: Fish Passage Workshop, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, May 6-8, 1997. Sponsored by Alden Research Laboratory, Conte Anadromous Fish Research Laboratory, Electric Power Research Institute, and Wisconsin Electric Power Company. Proceedings available from Alden Research Laboratory, Inc., arlmail@aldenlab.com.
56. SWEC, 1981. Biological evaluation of a modified traveling screen, Mystic Station - Unit 7, Final Report. Prepared for Boston Edison Company; August.
57. Taft E.P., Horst T.J., Downing J.K. Biological evaluation of a fine-mesh traveling screen for protecting organisms. Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Intake Technology, San Diego, CA. 1981.
58. Taft E.P., Larsen J., Holsapple J.G., Eberley L. Laboratory evaluation of larval fish impingement and diversion systems. Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Intake Technology, San Diego, CA. 1981.
59. Taft E.P., Plizga A.W., Paolini E.M., Sullivan C.W. Protecting fish with the new Modular Inclined Screen. The Environmental Professional. 19:(1):1997;185-191.
60. Thomas D.L., Miller G.J. Impingement studies at the Oyster Creek Generating Station, Forked River, New Jersey from September to December 1975. Proceedings of the Third National Workshop on Entrainment and Impingement. Ecological Analysts, Inc. 1976.
61. Veneziale E.J. Fish protection with wedge-wire screens at Eddystone Station. Proceedings of the American Power Conference. 1991.
62. White, J.D., Brehmer, M.L. 1976. Eighteen-month evaluation of the Ristroph traveling fish screen. In: Jensen, L.D. (Ed.), Third National Workshop on Entrainment and Impingement. Section 316b - Research and Compliance. Ecological Analysts, Inc., Melville, New York, pp. 376-380.