Context effects on sentence processing: A study based on the Competition Model

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 167-189

  Su, I Ru ^a  

^a NONE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039147896     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0142716401002028     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3-73). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence-processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245-299.
3. Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 248-368.
4. Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay in faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Foster, K. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In E. Cooper & E. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Gass, S. (1987). The resolution of conflicts among competing systems: A bidirectional perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 329-350.
7. Hargrove, P., & Panagos, J. (1982). Role saliency cues and children's sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 217-228.
8. Holmes, V. M. (1984). Parsing strategies and discourse context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 237-257.
9. Kail, M. (1989). Cue validity, cue cost, and processing type in sentence comprehension in French and Spanish. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 77-117). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Li, P., Bates, E., Liu, H., & MacWhinney, B. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 169-192.
11. MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanism of language acquisition (pp. 157-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegel, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127-150.
13. McDonald, J. (1987). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 379-413.
14. Miao, X. (1981). Word order and semantic strategies in Chinese sentence comprehension. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8, 23-33.
15. Mimica, I., Sullivan, M., & Smith, S. (1994). An on-line study of sentence interpretation in native Croatian speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 237-261.
16. Sasaki, Y. (1994). Paths of processing strategy transfers in learning Japanese and English as foreign languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 43-72.
17. Su, I.-R. (1995). Sentence processing transfer in Chinese EFL learners: a developmental perspective. In University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics (pp. 109-126). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
18. (1998). Sentence interpretation strategies in English learners of Chinese. In D. Yoshimi & M. Plumlee (Eds.), The life of language, the language of life: Selected papers of the first college-wide conference in languages, linguistics and literatures. University of Hawaii at Manoa, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
19. (2001). Transfer of sentence processing strategies: A comparison of L2 learners of Chinese and English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 83-112.
20. Taman, H. (1993). The utilization of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic cues in the assignment of subject role in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 299-317.