Some complexities of gendered talk about texts

Journal of Literacy Research

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 507-530

  Moore, David W ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039121087     PISSN: 1086296X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10862969709547972     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alvermann, D. E. (1995-1996). Peer-led discussions: Whose interests are served? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 39, 282-289.
2. Alvermann, D. E., & Commeyras, M. (1994). Gender, text, and discussion: Expanding the possibilities. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 183-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Alvermann, D. E., Commeyras, M., Young, J. P., Randall, S., & Hinson, D. (1997). Interrupting gendered discursive practices in classroom talk about texts: Easy to think about, difficult to do. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 73-104.
4. Alvermann, D. E., & Moore, D. W. (1991). Secondary school reading. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 951-983). White Plains, NY: Longman.
5. Alvermann, D. E., Young, J. P., Weaver, D., Hinchman, K. A., Moore, D. W., Phelps, S. F., Thrash, E. C., & Zalewski, P. (1996). Middle- and high-school students' perceptions of how they experience text-based discussions: A multicase study. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 244-267.
6. American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: The AAUW report: A study of major findings on girls and education. Washington, D C: Author.
7. Annas, P. J. (1987). Silences: Feminist language research and the teaching of language. In C. L. Caywood & G. R. Overing (Eds.), Teaching writing (pp. 3-17). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
8. Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school (Research Report no. 21). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
9. Apter, T., & Garnsey, E. (1994). Enacting inequality: Structure, agency, and gender. Women's Studies International Forum, 17 (1), 19-31.
10. Berger, R. J. (1995). Agency, structure, and Jewish survival of the holocaust: A life history study. The Sociological Quarterly, 36 (1), 15-36.
11. Bleich, D. (1986). Gender interests in reading and writing. In E. A. Flynn & P. P. Schweikart (Eds.), Gender and reading: Essays on readers, texts, and contexts (pp. 234-266). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 305-333.
13. Brophy, J. (1985). Interactions of male and female students with male and female teachers. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 115-142). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
14. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
15. Cherland, M. R. (1992). Gendered readings: Cultural restraints upon response to literature. The New Advocate, 5, 187-198.
16. Cuban, L. (1992). Curriculum stability and change. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 216-247). New York: Macmillan.
17. Davies, B. (1993a). Beyond dualism and towards multiple subjectivities. In L. Christian-Smith (Ed.), Texts of desire (pp. 145-173). London: Falmer Press.
18. Davies, B. (1993b). Shards of glass. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
19. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1992). Students' experiences of the curriculum. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 465-485). New York: Macmillan.
20. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
21. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
22. Farrell, E. (1994). Self and school success: Voices and lore of inner-city students. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
23. Farrell, E., Peguero, G., Lindsey, R., & White, R. (1988). Giving voice to high school students: Pressure and boredom, ya know what I'm sayin'? American Educational Research Journal, 25, 489-502.
24. Finders, M. J. (1996). "Just girls": Literacy and allegiance in junior high school. Written Communication, 13 (1), 93-129.
25. Fishman, A. (1988). Amish literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
26. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses. London: Falmer Press.
27. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
28. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29. Gilbert, P. (1988). Stoning the romance: Girls as resistant readers and writers. Curriculum Perspectives, 8 (2), 13-18.
30. Gilbert, P. (1992). The story so far: Gender, literacy, and social regulation. Gender and Education, 4, 185-199.
31. Gilbert, R. (1992). Text and context in qualitative educational research: Discourse analysis and the problem of contextual explanation. Linguistics and Education, 4, 37-57.
32. Goldblatt, E., & Smith, M.W. (1995). Alone with each other: Conceptions of discussion in one college classroom community. Linguistics and Education, 7, 327-348.
33. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies. New York: Routledge.
35. Guzzetti, B. J., & Williams, W. O. (1996). Gender, text, and discussion: Examining intellectual safety in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 5-20.
36. Hays, S. (1994). Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Sociological Theory, 12 (1), 57-72.
37. Hinchman, K., Alvermann, D., Young, J., Weaver, D., Moore, D., Phelps, S., & Zalewski, P. (1995, December). Finding gender in secondary school students' talk about text: Girls take notes because they spell better and some researchers make more of this than there is. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, New Orleans, LA.
38. James, D., & Clark, S. (1993). Men, women, and interruptions: A critical review. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 231-280). New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Jones, G. (1989). Gender bias in classroom interactions. Contemporary Education, 60, 216-222.
40. Kahle, J. B. (1990). Real students take chemistry and physics: Gender issues. In K. Tobin, J. B. Kahle, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), Windows into science classrooms (pp. 92-134). London: Falmer Press.
41. Kramarae, C., & Treichler, P. A. (1990). Power relationships in the classroom. In S. L. Gabriel & I. Smithson (Eds.), Gender in the classroom (pp. 41-59). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
42. Kreisberg, S. (1992). Transforming power: Domination, empowerment, and education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
43. LaFrance, M. (1991). School for scandal: Different educational experiences for males and females. Gender and Education, 3, 3-13.
44. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women's place. New York: Harper & Row.
45. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995, April). Representation and the text: Reframing the narrative voice. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
46. Luke, A. (1995). Text discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 21, pp. 3-48). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
47. McCracken, N. M., & Appleby, B. C. (Eds.). (1992). Gender issues in the teaching of English. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
48. Mills, S. (1995). Feminist stylistics. New York: Routledge.
49. Morse, L. W., & Handley, H. M. (1985). Listening to adolescents: Gender differences in science classroom interaction. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 37-56). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
50. Noddings, N. (1992). Gender and curriculum. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 659-684). New York: Macmillan.
51. Phelan, P., Yu, H. C., & Davidson, A. L. (1994). Negotiating the psychosocial pressures of adolescence: The voices and experiences of high school youth. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 415-447.
52. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness. New York: Scribner.
53. Shilling, C. (1992). Reconceptualising structure and agency in the sociology of education: Structuration theory and schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13 (1), 69-87.
54. Sommers, E., & Lawrence, S. (1992). Women's ways of talking in teacher-directed and student-directed peer response groups. Linguistics and Education, 4, 1-36.
55. Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 227-249.
57. Sztompka, P. (Ed.). (1994). Agency and structure. Langhorne, PA: Gordon & Breach.
58. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand. New York: Morrow.
59. Tannen, D., & Bly, R. (1993). Men and women: Talking together [Film]. (Available from Mystic Fire Video, PO Box 422, Prince Street Station, New York, NY 10012)
60. Tobin, K., & Garnett, P. (1987). Gender related differences in science activities. Science Education, 71, 91-103.
61. Waff, D. R. (1994). Girl talk: Creating community through social exchange. In M. Fine (Ed.), Chartering urban school reform: Reflections on high schools in the midst of change (pp. 192-203). New York: Teachers College Press.
62. Wolcott, H. F. (1990). Writing up qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63. Wortham, S. E. F. (1992). Participant examples and classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 4, 195-217.