Computer enumeration of significant implicational universals of kinship terminology

Cross-Cultural Research

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 162-174

  Valdés Pérez, Raúl E ^a   Pericliev, Vladimir ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039110527     PISSN: 10693971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106939719903300202     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Burton, M. L., Brudner, L. A., & White, D. R. (1977). A model of the sexual division of labor. American Ethnologist, 4, 227-251.
2. Cannon, G. (1991). Jones' "Sprung from some common source." In S. M. Lamb & E. D. Mitchell (Eds.), Sprung from some common source: Investigations into the prehistory of languages (pp. 23-47). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3. Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. D'Andrade, R. G. (1976). A prepositional analysis of U.S. American beliefs about illness. In K. H. Basso & H. A. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology (pp. 155-180). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
5. Good, P. (1994). Permutation tests. New York: Springer Verlag.
6. Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Language universals (with special reference to feature hierarchies). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
7. Greenberg, J. H. (1978). Typologies and cross-linguistic generalizations. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol. 1, pp. 33-59). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Greenberg, J. H. (1980). Universals of kinship terminology: Their nature and the problem of their explanation. In J. Maquet (Ed.), On linguistic anthropology: Essays in honor of Harry Hoijer (pp. 9-32). Malibu, CA: Udena Publications.
9. Grimes, B. F. (Ed.) (1996) Ethnologue: Languages of the world, Thirteenth Edition. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
10. Hurford, J. (1977). The significance of linguistic generalizations. Language, 53(3), 574-620.
11. Murdock, G. P. (1970). Kin term patterns and their distribution. Ethnology, 9, 165-207.
12. Pericliev, V., & Valdés-Pérez, R. E. (1998). Automatic componential analysis of kinship semantics with a proposed structural solution to the problem of multiple models. Anthropological Linguistics, 40, 272-317.
13. Segal, E. S. (1983). The structure of division of labor. Behavior Science Research, 18, 3-25.
14. Simon, H. A. (1977). On judging the plausibility of theories. In Models of discovery (pp. 25-45). Boston: Reidel.
15. Valdés-Pérez, R. E. (1995, Fall). Some recent human/computer discoveries in science and what accounts for them. AI Magazine, 16(3), 37-44.
16. Valdés-Pérez, R. E. (1996). Computer science research on scientific discovery. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(1), 57-66.
17. Valdés-Pérez, R. E., & Pericliev, V. (1997). Maximally parsimonious discrimination: A generic task from linguistic discovery. In Proceedings of 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 515-520). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
18. Valdés-Pérez, R. E., & Pericliev, V. (1998). Concise, intelligible, and approximate profiling of numerous classes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19. White, D. R. (1996). Statistical entailments and the galois lattice. Social Networks, 18, 201-215.
20. White, D. R., Burton, M. L., & Brudner, L. A. (1977). Entailment theory and method: A cross cultural analysis of the sexual division of labor. Behavior Science Research, 12(1), 1-24.
21. Winkelman, M. J. (1986). Magico-religious practitioner types and socioeconomic conditions. Behavior Science Research, 20, 17-46.