Operational evaluation of air quality models

Novartis Foundation Symposium

Volumn 220, Issue , 1999, Pages 33-51

  Sampson, Paul D ^a   Guttorp, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OZONE;

AIR POLLUTANT; AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

AIR POLLUTANTS; AIR POLLUTION; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OZONE;

EID: 0039104585     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bookstein FL 1989 Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell 11:567-585
2. Brown PJ, Le N, Zidek JV 1994 Multivariate spatial interpolation and exposure to air pollutants. Can J Stat 22:489-509
3. Carroll RJ, Chen R, Li TH et al 1997 Trends in ozone exposure in Harris County, Texas. J Am Stat Assoc 92:392-415
4. Code of Federal Regulations (Title 40, part 50) 1997 Protection of the environment; national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
5. Code of Federal Regulations (Title 40, part 51) 1997 Protection of the environment; requirements for preparation, adoption, and submittal of implementation plans. Appendix W: guideline on air quality models. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
6. Cressie NAC 1991 Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York
7. Dennis RL, Barchet WR, Clark TL, Seilkop SK 1990 Evaluation of regional acidic deposition models (Part 1), NAPAP SOS/T report 5. In: National acid precipitation assessment program: state of science and technology, vol 1. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Washington, DC
8. Dennis RL, McHenry JN, Barchet WR, Binkowski FS, Byun DW 1993 Correcting RADM sulfate underprediction: discovery and correction of model errors and testing the corrections through comparisons against field data. Atmos Environ 27A:975-997
9. Environmental Protection Agency 1994 Guidance on urban airshed model (UAM) reporting requirements for attainment demonstration, EPA-454/R-93-056. US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
10. Gee JC, Haynor D 1998 Numerical methods for high-dimensional warps. In: Toga AW (ed) Brain warping. Academic Press, San Diego, in press
11. Guttorp P, Sampson PD 1994 Methods for estimating heterogeneous spatial covariance functions with environmental applications. In: Patil GP, Rao CR (eds) Handbook of statistics XII: environmental statistics. Elsevier/North Holland, New York, p 663-690
12. Guttorp P, Meiring W, Sampson PD 1994 A space-time analysis of ground-level ozone data. Environmetrics 5:241-254
13. Hanna SR, Moore GE, Fernau ME 1996 Evaluation of photochemical grid models (UAM-IV, UAM-V, and the ROM/UAM-IV couple) using data from the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS). Atmos Environ 30:3265-3279
14. Hass H, Jakobs HJ, Memmesheimer M 1995 Analysis of a regional model (EURAD) near surface gas concentration predictions using observations from networks. Meteorol Atmos Phys 57:173-200
15. Hass H, Builtjes PJH, Simpson D, Stern R 1997 Comparison of model results obtained with several European regional air quality models. Atmos Environ 31:3257-3277
16. Høst G, Omre H, Switzer P 1995 Spatial interpolation errors for monitoring data. J Am Stat Assoc 90:853-861
17. Hwang D, Byun DW, Odman MT 1997 An automatic differentiation technique for sensitivity analysis of numerical advection schemes in air quality models. Atmos Environ 31:879-888
18. Lefohn A, Roth P, Ziman S 1998 The proposed standard for ozone: the feasibility of attainment and the role of modeling in planning. NARSTO White Paper (http://odysseus.owt.com/Narsto/ scienceforum.html)
19. Ludwig FL 1994 A procedure for determining representative monitoring sites for photochemical model evaluation studies. In: Solomon PA, Silver TA (eds) Planning and managing air quality modeling and measurement studies: a perspective through SJVAQS/ AUSPEX. Lewis Publishers/Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Chelsea, MI, USA, p 597-615
20. McNair LA, Harley, RA, Russell AG 1996 Spatial inhomogeneity in pollutant concentrations, and their implications for air quality model evaluation. Atmos Environ 30:4291-4301
21. Meiring W, Guttorp P, Sampson PD 1998 Space-time estimation of grid-cell hourly ozone levels for assessment of a deterministic model. Environ Ecol Stat 5, in press
22. Meng Z, Dabdub D, Seinfeld JH 1998 Size-resolved and chemically resolved model of atmospheric aerosol dynamics. J Geophys Res Atmos 103:3419-3435
23. National Research Council 1991 Rethinking the ozone problem in urban and regional air pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
24. Sampson PD, Guttorp P 1992 Nonparametric estimation of nonstationary spatial covariance structure. J Am Stat Assoc 87:108-119
25. Sampson PD, Lewis S, Guttorp P, Bookstein FL, Hurley CB 1991 Computation and interpretation of deformation for landmark data in morphometrics and environmetrics. In: Keramidas EM (ed) Computing science and statistics. Proceedings of the 23rd symposium on the Interface. Interface Foundation of America, Fairfax Station, VA, p 534-541
26. Schere KL 1988 Ozone air quality models: critical review discussion papers. J Air Poll Ctrl Waste Mgmt 38:1114-1119
27. Seinfeld JH 1988 Ozone air quality models: a critical review. J Air Poll Ctrl Waste Mgmt 38:616-645
28. Solomon PA, Silver TA (eds) 1994 Planning and managing air quality modeling and measurement studies: a perspective through SJVAQS/AUSPEX. Lewis Publishers/Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Chelsea, MI, USA
29. Wikle CK 1996 Spatio-temporal statistical models with applications to atmospheric processes. PhD dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
30. Wikle CK, Cressie NAC 1997 A dimension-reduction approach to space-time Kalman filtering. Preprint No. 97-24, Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, IA