The Influence of Rhythmic Context on Schwa Epenthesis and Schwa Deletion in Dutch

Language and Speech

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 87-108

  Kuijpers, Cecile ^a   Van Donselaar, Wilma ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Metrical priming; Phonological variation; Speech production; Sw alternation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039099781     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002383099804100105     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BOOIJ, G. (1995). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press.
2. BELL, A., & HOOPER, J. B. (1978). Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
3. BERENDSEN, E., & ZONNEVELD, W. (1985). Nederlandse schwa-invoeging op z'n Deens. Spektator, 14, 166-169.
4. BURNAGE, G. (1990). CELEX: A Guide for users. Nijmegen: Center for Lexical Information, University of Nijmegen.
5. BRUBAKER, R. S. (1972). Rate and pause characteristics of oral reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1, 141-147.
6. COLLINS, B., & MEES, I. (1981). The sounds of English and Dutch. The Hague: Leiden University Press.
7. COOPER, W. E., & DANLEY, M. (1981). Segmental and temporal aspects of utterance-final lengthening. Phonetica, 38, 106-115.
8. CUTLER, A. (1980). Syllable omission errors and isochrony. In H. W. Dechert & M. Rampach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech studies in honor of Frieda Goldman-Eisler (pp.183-190). The Hague: Mouton.
9. DELL, F. (1973). Les règles et les sons: Introduction à la Phonologie Générative. Paris: Hermann.
10. DONSELAAR, W. van, KUIJPERS, C., & CUTLER, A. (1996). How do Dutch listeners process words with epenthetic schwa? In H. T. Bunnell & W. Idsardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Speech Processing, Vol.1 (pp.94-97). Philadelphia: University of Delaware & A. I. DuPont Institute.
11. DONSELAAR, W. van, KUIJPERS, C., & CUTLER, A. (submitted). Facilitatory effects of vowel epenthesis on word processing in Dutch.
12. FEAR, B. D., CUTLER, A., & BUTTERFIELD, S. (1995). The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1893-1904.
13. GUSSENHOVEN, C. (1993). The Dutch foot and the chanted call. Journal of Linguistics, 29, 37-63.
14. HAAS, W. de (1986). Partial syllabification and schwa epenthesis in Dutch. Gramma, 10, 143-162.
15. HULST, H. van der (1984). Syllable structure and stress in Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
16. KAGER, R., & ZONNEVELD, W. (1986). Schwa, syllables, and extrametricality in Dutch. The Linguistic Review, 5, 197-221.
17. KAISSE, E. M. (1985). Connected speech: The interaction of syntax and phonology. New York: Academic Press.
18. KELLY, M. H. (1988). Rhythmic alternation and lexical stress differences in English. Cognition, 30, 107-137.
19. KELLY, M. H., & BOCK, J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 389-403.
20. KUIJK, D. van (1996). Does lexical stress or metrical stress better predict word boundaries? Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. 3 (pp.1585-1588). Philadelphia: University of Delaware & A. I. DuPont Institute.
21. KUIJPERS, C., DONSELAAR, W. van, & CUTLER, A. (1996). Phonological variation: Epenthesis and deletion of schwa in Dutch. In H. T. Bunnell & W. Idsardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Speech Processing, Vol.1 (pp.149-152). Philadelphia: University of Delaware & A. I. DuPont Institute.
22. LEHISTE, I. (1979). Perception of sentence and paragraph boundaries. In B. Lindblom & S. Öhman (Eds.), Frontiers of speech communication research (pp.91-201). London: Academic Press.
23. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. LEVELT, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes, and representations. Cognition, 42, 1-22.
25. LEVELT, W. J. M., & MAASSEN, B. (1981). Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. In W. Klein & W. Levelt (Eds.), Crossing the boundaries in linguistics (pp. 212-252). Dordrecht: Reidel.
26. LIBERMAN, M., & PRINCE, A. S. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249-336.
27. McDONALD, J. L., BOCK, K., & KELLY, M. H. (1993). Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 188-230.
28. MEHLER, J., DOMMERGUES, J. -Y., FRAUENFELDER, U., & SEGUI, J. (1981).The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 298-305.
29. NESPOR, M., & VOGEL, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
30. REENEN, P. Th. van. (1986). The vocalization of /l/ in standard Dutch, a pilot study of an ongoing change. In F. Beukema & A. Hulk (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp.189-199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
31. ROELOFS, A. (1996). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
32. SELKIRK, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. SLUIJTER, A., & TERKEN, J. (1993). Beyond sentence prosody: Paragraph intonation in Dutch. Phonetica, 50, 180-188.
34. SWERTS, M. (1995). Prosodic features of discourse units. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Technical University, Eindhoven.
35. TREIMAN. R., SALASOO, A., SLOWIACZEK, L., & PISONI, D. (1982). Effects of syllable structure on adults' phoneme monitoring performance. Progress Report, 8, Indiana University Speech Research Laboratory.
36. TREIMAN, R., & DANIS, C. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 87-104.
37. TROMMELEN, M. (1983). The syllable in Dutch, with special reference to diminutive formation. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
38. TROMMELEN, M., & ZONNEVELD, W. (1989). Klemtoon en metrische fonologie. Muiderberg: Coutinho.
39. WIJNEN, F., KRIKHAAR, E., & DEN, OS, E. (1994). The (non)realization of unstressed elements in children's utterances: Evidence for a rhythmic constraint. Journal of Child Language, 21, 59-83.