Decision theory without logical omniscience: Toward an axiomatic framework for bounded rationality

Review of Economic Studies

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 339-361

  Lipman, Barton L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039065970     PISSN: 00346527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-937X.00090     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. CHEW, S. H. and KARNI, E. (1994), "Choquet Expected Utility with Finite State Space: Commutativity and Act-Independence", Journal of Economic Theory, 62, 469-479.
2. DEKEL, E., LIPMAN, B. and RUSTICHINI, A. (1997), "Recent Developments in Modeling Unforeseen Contingencies" (Working paper).
3. FAGIN, R., HALPERN, J., MOSES, Y. and VARDI, M. (1995) Reasoning about Knowledge (Cambridge: MIT Press).
4. FISHBURN, P. (1973), "Intransitive Indifference in Preference Theory: A Survey", Operations Research, 10, 207-228.
5. GHIRARDATO, P. and LE BRETON, M. (1997), "Choquet Rationalizability" (Cal Tech working paper).
6. GILBOA, I. and SCHMEIDLER, D. (1994), "Additive Representations of Non-Additive Measures and the Choquet Integral", Annals of Operations Research, 52, 43-65.
7. GUL, F. (1992), "Savage's Theorem with a Finite Number of States", Journal of Economic Theory, 57, 99-110.
8. HINTIKKA, J. (1975), "Impossible Possible Worlds Vindicated", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4, 475-484.
9. KREPS, D. (1979), "A Representation Theorem for 'Preference for Flexibility'", Econometrica, 47, 565-577.
10. KREPS, D. (1992), "Static Choice in the Presence of Unforeseen Contingencies", in P. Dasgupta, D. Gale, O. Hart and E. Maskin (eds.), Economic Analysis of Markets and Games: Essays in Honor of Frank Hahn (Cambridge: MIT Press), 259-281.
11. LIPMAN, B. (1991), "How to Decide How to Decide How to . . . : Modeling Limited Rationality", Econometrica, 59, 1105-1125.
12. LIPMAN, B. (1994a), "Logics for Nonomniscient Agents: An Axiomatic Approach" in M. Bacharach, L. A. Gerard-Varet, P. Mongin, H. Shin, (eds.), Epistemic Logic and the Theory of Games and Decisions (Dordrecht: Kluwer), forthcoming.
13. LIPMAN, B. (1994b), "An Axiomatic Approach to the Logical Omniscience Problem", in R. Fagin (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference (San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers).
14. LIPMAN, B. (1995), "Information Processing and Bounded Rationality: A Survey", Canadian Journal of Economics, 28, 42-67.
15. LUCE, R. D. and KRANTZ, D. (1971), "Conditional Expected Utility", Econometrica, 39, 565-577.
16. MORRIS, S. (1996), "The Logic of Belief and Belief Change: A Decision Theoretic Approach", Journal of Economic Theory, 69, 1-23.
17. MUKERJI, S. and SHIN, H. S. (1997), "Equilibrium Departures from Common Knowledge in Games with Non-Additive Expected Utility" (Working paper).
18. RANTALA, V. (1975), "Urn Models: A New Kind of Non-Standard Model for First-Order Logic", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4, 455-474.
19. RESCHER, N. and BRANDOM, R. (1979), The Logic of Inconsistency (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
20. RUBINSTEIN, A. (1991), "Comments on the Interpretation of Game Theory", Econometrica, 59, 909-924.
21. RUBINSTEIN, A. (1998) Modeling Bounded Rationality (Cambridge: MIT Press).
22. SAVAGE, L. J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (New York: Dover).
23. SAVAGE, L. J. (1967), "Difficulties in the Theory of Personal Probability", Philosophy of Science, 34, 305-310.
24. SHAFER, G. (1976), A Mathematical Theory of Evidence (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
25. SHIN, H. S. (1993), "Logical Structure of Common Knowledge", Journal of Economic Theory, 60, 1-13.
26. SKIADAS, C. (1996), "Subjective Probability under Additive Aggregation of Conditional Preferences" (Working paper, Department of Finance, Northwestern University).