Common entities and missing properties: Similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 90-102

  Iivonen, Mirja ^a   Kivimäki, Katja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039065186     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aristoteles (1994). Kategoriat. In Aristoteles H: kategorial. Tulkinnasta. Ensimmäinen analytlikka. Helsinki: Gaudeamus. 7-38.
2. Aitchison, J. & Gilchrist, A. (1987). Thesaurus construction. A practical manual. 2. ed. London: Aslib.
3. Anderson, J. D. (1997). Organization of knowledge. In J. Feather & P. Sturges (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. London: Routledge. 336-353.
4. Dahlberg, I. (1978). A referent-oriented, analytical concept theory for INTERCONCEPT. International Classification 5 (3). 143-151.
5. Dahlberg, I. (1980). New trends in classification. In P. J. Taylor (Ed.). New trends in documentation and information. Proceedings of the 39th FID Congress. London: Aslib. 214-222.
6. Dahlberg, I. (1981). Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT. International Classification 8 (1). 16-22.
7. Fidel, R. (1985). Individual variability in online searching behavior. In C. A. Parkhurst (Ed.) ASIS '85: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science 48th Annual Meeting. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications. 69-72.
8. Fidel, R. (1987). What is missing in research about online searching behavior. Canadian Journal of Information Science 12 (3/4). 54-61.
9. Fugmann, R. (1982). The complementary of natural and indexing languages. International Classification 9 (3). 140-144.
10. Fugmann, R. (1985). The five-axiom theory of indexing and information supply. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 36 (2). 116-129.
11. Fugmann, R. (1992). Indexing quality: Predictability versus consistency. International Classification 19 (1). 20-21.
12. Fugmann, R. (1993). Subject analysis and indexing: Theoretical foundation and practical advice. Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag.
13. Fugmann, R. (1994). Representational predictability: Key to the resolution of several pending issues in indexing and information supply. In Knowledge organisation and quality management. Ed. Hanne Albrechtsen and Susanne Oernager, p. 414-422. Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag.
14. Funk, M. E., Reid, C. A. & McCoogan, L. S. (1983). Indexing consistency in medline. Bulletin of Medical Library Associations, 71 (2). 176-183.
15. Hutchins, W. J. (1978). Languages of indexing and classification. Stevenage: Peter Peregrinus.
16. Iivonen, M. (1989). Indeksointituloksen riippuvuus indeksointiympäristöstä. Tampereen yliopisto, Kirjastotieteen ja infotmatiikan laitoksen tutkimuksia 26. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto.
17. Iivonen, M. (1990). Interindexer consistency and the indexing environment. International Forum on Information and Documentation 15 (2). 16-21.
18. Iivonen, M. (1993). Johdonmukaisuuden laskeminen tiedon tallennuksen ja haun tutkimuksessa. Kirjastotiede ja informatiikka 12 (2). 63-76.
19. Iivonen, M. (1995a). Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms. Information Processing & Management 31 (2). 173-190.
20. Iivonen, M. (1995b). Hakulausekkeiden muotoilun yh-denmukaisuus onlineviitehaussa. Tampere: University of Tampere. (With English summary)
21. Iivonen, M., Sonnenwald D. H. (1998). From translation to navigation of different discourses: A model of search term selection during the pre-online stage of the search process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (4). 312-326.
22. Iyer, H. (1995). Classificatory structures: Concepts, relations, and representation. Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag.
23. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Lancaster, F. W. (1968). Evaluation of the Medlars demand search service. Washington D.C.: National Library of Medicine.
25. Lancaster, F. W. (1991). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. London: The Library Association.
26. Markey, K. (1984). Interindexer consistency tests: A literature review and report of a test of consistency in indexing visual materials. Library and Information Science Research 6 (2). 155-177.
27. Ranganathan, S. R. (1957). Prolegomena to library classification. 2. ed. London: Library Association.
28. Saracevic, T. (1984). Measuring the degree of agreement between searchers. In B. Flood, J. Witiak & T. H. Hogan (Ed.). ASIS '84: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science 47th Annual Meeting. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications. 227-230.
29. Saracevic, T. & Kantor, P. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving. III. Searchers, searches, and overlap. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 39 (3). 197-216.
30. Soergel, D. (1985). Organizing information: Principles of database and retrieval systems. San Diego: Academic Press.
31. Zunde, P. & Dexter, M. E. (1969). Indexing consistency and quality. American Documentation 20 (4). 259-267.