The paradox of paternalism and laissez–faire constitutionalism: United states supreme court, 1888–1921

Law and History Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1987, Pages 249-279

  Soifer, Aviam ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039059744     PISSN: 07382480     EISSN: 19399022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/743942     Document Type: Article

References (219)

1. A.V. Dicey, Lectures on Law and Public Opinion in England During the Nineteenth Century (London, 1905) 150 n. l.
2. Robert A. Ferguson, Law and Letters in American Culture (Cambridge, 1985)
3. R. Kent Newmyer, Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story (Chapel Hill, 1985) 40–43, 243–246.
4. Robert M. Cover, Justice Accused:Antislavery and the Judicial Process (New Haven, 1975) 16;
5. Dennis R. Nolan, ‘Sir William Blackstone and The New American Republic: A Study of Intellectual Impact’, 51 New York University Law Review 731 (1976).
6. Richard A. Cosgrove, The Rule of Law: Albert Venn Dicey, Victorian Jurist (London, 1980).
7. David Sugarman, ‘The Legal Boundaries of Liberty: Dicey, Liberalism and Legal Science’, 46 Modern Law Review 102 (1983).
8. Lochner V. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).
9. John Hart Ely, ‘The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade’, 82 Yale Law Journal 920, 944 (1973).
10. Holden V. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898).
11. Holden V. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898).
12. Holmes's statement in Minnesota Iron Co. v. Kline, 199 U.S. 593, 598 (1905).
13. Cantwell V. Missouri, 199 U.S. 602 (1905).
14. Austin V. Tennessee, 179 U.S. 343 (1900).
15. James Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co., 242 U.S. 311 (1917).
16. Powell V. Pennsylvania, 127 U.S. 678 (1888).
17. Muller V. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908).
18. Bunting V. Oregon, 243 U.S. 426 (1917).
19. David P. Currie, ‘The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The Protection of Economic Interests, 1889–1910’, 52 University of Chicago Law Review 324 (1985).
20. Lionel Robbins, The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy (London, 1952).
21. Calvin Woodard, ‘Reality and Social Reform: The Transition from Laissez–Faire to the Welfare State’, 72 Yale Law Journal 286 (1962).
22. P.S. Atiyah, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford, 1979).
23. Grant Gilmore, The Ages of American Law (New Haven, 1977) 60.
24. Robert Mccloskey, The American Supreme Court (Chicago, 1960) 105.
25. Clyde E. Jacobs, Law Writers and the Courts: The Influence of Thomas M. Cooley, Christopher G. Tiedeman, and John F. Dillon upon American Constitutional Law (Berkeley, 1954).
26. Robert Mccloskey, American Conservatism in the Age of Enterprise (Cambridge, 1951)
27. Richard Hofstadter, Social Darwinism in American Thought (Philadelphia, 1944).
28. Benjamin R. Twiss, Lawyers and the Constitution: How Laissez-Faire came to the Supreme Court (Princeton, 1942) [hereinafter cited as Twiss, Lawyers and the Constitution].
29. Edward S. Corwin, The Twilight of the Supreme Court (New Haven, 1934).
30. Matthew Josephson, The Robber Barons (New York, 1934).
31. Max Lerner,‘The Supreme Court and American Capitalism’, 42 Yale Law Journal 668 (1933).
32. Charles W. Mccurdy, ‘Justice Field and the Jurisprudence of Government–Business Relations: Some Parameters of Laissez–Faire Constitutionalism, 1863–1897’, Journal of American History 61 (1975) 970.
33. Michael Les Benedict, ‘Laissez–Faire and Liberty: A Re–Evaluation of the Meaning and Origins of Laissez–Faire Constitutionalism’, Law and History Review 3 () 293.
34. John E. Semonche, Charting The Future: The Supreme Court Responds to a Changing Society (Westport, 1978).
35. Alexander M. Bickel and Benno C. Schmidt, Jr., History of the Supreme Court of the United States: The Judiciary and Responsible Government (New York, 1984).
36. Daniel T. Rodgers, ‘In Search of Progressivism’, Reviews in American History 10(1982) 113.
37. Robert H. Wiebe, TheSearchfor Order, 1877–1920 (1967).
38. David A. Hollinger, ‘Comments on Papers by Sharlin and Wall’ in ‘Symposium on Spencer, Scientism and American Constitutional Law’, Annals of Science 33 (1976) 476.
39. Joseph Frazier Wall, Andrew Carnegie (New York, 1970).
40. Robert C. Bannister, Social Darwinism: Science and Myth in Anglo–American Social Thought (Philadelphia, 1979).
41. Lochner V. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905) quoted by Wall at 471.
42. R. Jackson Wilson, ed., Darwinism and the American Intellectual (Homewood, 1967).
43. R. Jackson Wilson, In Quest of Community: Social Philosophy in the United States, 1860–1920 (New York, 1968) 56.
44. Robert W. Gordon, ‘Holmes’ Common Law as Legal and Social Science’, 10 Hofstra Law Review 719, 722–723 (1982) (tendency of the age ‘to treat the world as a hard object gradually being discovered by means of the suppression of human subjectivity’).
45. Thomas C. Grey, ‘Langdell’s Orthodoxy’, 45 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 1 (1983) (impact of analogy to geometry).
46. John L. Thomas, Alternative America: Henry George, Edward Bellamy, Henry Demarest Lloyd and the Adversary Tradition (Cambridge, 1983).
47. Robert M. Crunden, Ministers of Reform: The Progressives’ Achievement in American Civilization 1889–1920 (New York, 1982).
48. Stuart Creighton Miller, ‘Benevolent Assimili–ation’ : The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899–1903 (New Haven, 1982).
49. James C. Whorton, Crusaders for Fitness: The History of American Health Reformers (Princeton, 1982).
50. Robert W. Gordon, ‘Legal Thought and Legal Practice in the Age of American Enterprise, 1870–1920’, in Gerald L. Geison, ed., Professions and Professional Ideologies in America, 1730–1940 (Chapel Hill, 1983) 70–110.
51. Loren P. Beth, The Development of the American Constitution, 1877–1917 (New York, 1971).
52. Thomas K. Mccraw, Prophets of Regulation (Cambridge, 1985).
53. Duncan Kennedy, ‘Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication’, 89 Harvard Law Review 1685 (1976).
54. Charles Warren, The Supreme Court in United States History (Boston, 1926) 742–44.
55. Charles Warren, ‘Massachusetts as a Philanthropic Robber’, 12 Harvard Law Review 316, 318 (1898).
56. Felix Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Holmes and the Supreme Court (Cambridge, 1938).
57. Stephen Stagner, ‘The Recall of Judicial Decisions and the Due Process Debate’, 24 American Journal of Legal History 257 (1980).
58. Charles C. Goetsch, ‘The Future of Legal Formalism’, at 257.
59. Eugene D. Genovese, Roll, Jordan, Roll (New York, 1974).
60. James Oakes, The Ruling Race (New York, 1982).
61. William S. Mcfeely, Yankee Stepfather (New Haven, 1968).
62. Herman Belz, A New Birth of Freedom (Westport, 1976).
63. Herman Belz, Reconstructing the Union (Ithaca, 1969).
64. Janet Sharp Hermann, The Pursuit of a Dream (New York, 1981).
65. James M. Mcpherson, The Abolitionist Legacy (Princeton, 1975).
66. David Montgomery, Beyond Equality (New York, 1967).
67. David Roberts, Paternalism in Early Victorian England (New Brunswick, 1979).
68. Richard Sennett, Authority (New York, 1980).
69. J.M. Barrie’s Peter Pan was first performed in London in 1904.
70. Willard L. King, Melville W. Fuller, Chief Justice of the United States, 1888–1910 (New York, 1950) 120.
71. ‘Pauper Pension bill’. The Nation 44 (March 10, 1887) 202.
72. George F. Parker, ed., The Writings and Speeches of Grover Cleveland (New York, 1892) 450.
73. Morton Keller, Affairs of State (Cambridge, 1977).
74. R. Hal Williams, Years of Decision (New York, 1978).
75. Blyew V. United States, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.) 581 (1872).
76. V. Reese, 92 U.S. 214 (1876).
77. V. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876).
78. V. Harris, 106 U.S. 699 (1883).
79. V. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1879).
80. Virginia V. Rives, 100 U.S. 313 (1879).
81. Ex Parte Virginia, 100 U.S. 339 (1879).
82. Ex Parte Yarborough, 110 U.S. 651 (1884).
83. Santa Clara County V. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394 (1886) (dictum).
84. Pembina Mining Co. V. Pennsylvania, 125 U.S. 181 (1888) (holding that corporation was a person for purposes of fourteenth amendment).
85. Missouri V. Lewis, 101 U.S. 22 (1879).
86. Barbier V. Connolly, 113 U.S. 27 (1885).
87. Richard S. Kay, ‘The Equal Protection Clause in the Supreme Court, 1873–1903’, 29 Buffalo Law Review 667 (1980).
88. C. Jacobs, Law Writers and the Courts, supra note 7.
89. Elk V. Williams, 112 U.S. 94 (1884).
90. Minor V. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875).
91. Bradwell V. State, 83 U.S. (15 Wall.) 130 (1872).
92. Civil Rights Cases 109 U.S. 3, 24 (1883).
93. Loren P. Beth, The Development of the American Constitution, supra note 11.
94. David J. Rothman, Politics and Power (Cambridge, 1966).
95. R. Hal Williams, Years of Decision, supra note 19.
96. Morton Keller, Affairs of State, supra note 19.
97. James Bryce, The American Commonwealth 3 vols. (London, 1889) ii: 408.
98. Clyde E. Jacobs, Law Writers and the Courts, supra note 7.
99. Roscoe Pound, ‘Liberty of Contract’, 18 Yale Law Journal 454 (1909).
100. Morton Keller, Affairs of State supra note 19 at 366.
101. Charles W. Mccurdy, ‘Justice Field and the Jurisprudence of Government–Business Relations,’ supra note 7.
102. John E. Semonche, Charting the Future, supra note 7 at 168–79, 244–45.
103. Robert E. Garner, ‘Justice Brewer and Substantive Due Process: A Conservative Court Revisited’, 18 Vanderbilt Law Review 615 (1965).
104. W. Nelson, The Roots of American Bureaucracy, 1830–1900 (1982).
105. David P. Currie, ‘The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The Protection of Economic Interests, 1889–1910’, supra note 4.
106. Walter F. Pratt, ‘Rhetorical Styles in the Fuller Court’, supra note 13.
107. Walton H. Hamilton, ‘On Dating Mr. Justice Holmes’, 9 University of Chicago Law Review 1, 10, 15, 26–29 (1941).
108. Yosal Rogat, ‘Mr. Justice Holmes: A Dissenting Opinion’, 15 Stanford Law Review 3, 254 (1962–1963).
109. Yosal Rogat and James M. O'Fallon, ‘Mr. Justice Holmes: A Dissenting Opinion—The Speech Cases’, 36 Stanford Law Review 1349 (1984).
110. Saul Touster, ‘Holmes a Hundred Years Ago: The Common Law and Legal Theory’, 10 Hofstra Law Review 673 (1982).
111. Robert W. Gordon, ‘Holmes's Common Law as Legal and Social Science’, supra note 10.
112. Grant Gilmore, The Ages of American Law, supra note 6 at 48–56.
113. Herman Belz, ‘The Constitution in the Gilded Age: The Beginnings of Constitutional Realism in American Scholarship’, 13 American Journal of Legal History 110 (1969).
114. Bernard J. Brommel, Eugene V. Debs (Chicago, 1978) 49, 61–63, 80.
115. Upton Sinclair was commissioned to do a study of wage slavery in the meatpacking industry, resulting in The Jungle (1906).
116. Arnold M. Paul, Conservative Crisis and the Rule of law; Attitudes of Bar and Bench, 1887–1895 (Ithaca, 1960).
117. Bernard Bailyn, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, 1967).
118. State V. Goodwill, 33 W. Va. 179, 186 (1889).
119. Godcharles V. Wigeman, 113 Pa. 431 (1886).
120. Millett V. Illinois, 117 111. 294 (1886).
121. Twiss, Lawyers and the Constitution, supra note 7.
122. Arnold M. Paul, Conservative Crisis and the Rule of Law, supra note 38 at 63–64, 70–72, 84–85.
123. Gregory S. Alexander, ‘The Dead Hand and the Law of Trusts in the Nineteenth Century’, 37 Stanford Law Review 1189, 1244–1247 (1985).
124. Charles Warren, ‘The Progressiveness of the United States Supreme Court’, 13 Columbia Law Review 294, 295 (1913).
125. Roscoe Pound, ‘Law in Books and Law in Action’, 44 American Law Review 12 (1910).
126. Henry Sumner Maine, Ancient Law (London, 5th ed. 1873) 165.
127. In re Morrissey, 137 U.S. 157, 199 (1890).
128. In re Grimley, 137 U.S. 147 (1890).
129. Chae Chan Ping V. United States, 130 U.S. 581 (1889).
130. Fong Yue Ting V. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893).
131. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).
132. Robert Mcclellan, The Heathen Chinese (Columbus, 1971).
133. Charles J. Mcclain, Jr., ‘The Chinese Struggle for Civil Rights in 19th–Century America: The Unusual Case of Baldwin v. Franks’, Law and History Review 3 (1985) 349.
134. In re Debs, 158 U.S. 564, 586, 582 (1895).
135. Gettysburg Electric Railway, 160 U.S. 688 (1896).
136. United States v. Realty Co., 163 U.S. 427 (1896).
137. South Carolina V. United States, 199 U.S. 437 (1905).
138. Mccray V. United States, 195 U.S. 27 (1904).
139. Leonard W. Levy, The Law of the Commonwealth and Chief Justice Shaw (Cambridge, 1957) 109–117.
140. Francis Lieber, in ‘The Supreme Court on the Military Status’, 31 American Law Review 342, 353 (1897).
141. C. Vann Woodward, ‘The Case of the Louisiana Traveler’, in John A. Garraty, ed., Quarrels That Have Shaped the Constitution (New York, 1975) 145, 155.
142. The Shipping Commissioners’ Act of 1872, 17 Stat. 243.
143. Robertson, 165 U.S. at 276 (1897).
144. Robertson, 165 U.S. at 293 (1897).
145. Patterson V. Bark Eudora, 190 U.S. 169 (1903).
146. Robertson V. Baldwin and earlier cases involving sailors and their ‘care’ (unpublished manuscript, 1982).
147. K.N. Llewellyn and E. Adamson Hoebel, The Cheyenne Way, (Norman, 1941).
148. Talton V. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896).
149. Santa Clara Pueblo V. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978).
150. A. Debo, And Still the Waters Run 21–22 (1940).
151. Justice Brewer, In re Heff, 197 U.S. 488 (1905).
152. Robert M. Utley, The Indian Frontier of the American West 1846–1890 (Albuquerque, 1984).
153. Russel L. Barsh and James Y. Henderson, The Road: Indian Tribes and Political Liberty (Berkeley, 1980).
154. Wilcomb E. Washburn, Red Man's Land/White Man's Law (New York, 1970).
155. Daniel F. Littlefield, The Cherokee Freedman (Westport, 1978).
156. Choctaw Nation V. U.S., 119 U.S. 1 (1886).
157. Russell V. Southard, 53 U.S. (12 How.) 139 (1851).
158. Graffam V. Burgess, 117 U.S. 180 (1886).
159. Choctaw Nation V. U.S., 119 U.S. 1 (1886).
160. Choctaw Nation V. U.S., 119 U.S. 1, 28 (1886).
161. U.S. V. The Choctaw Nation and The Chickasaw Nation, 193 U.S. 115, 124 (1904).
162. Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3, 20–21 (1883).
163. Williams V. Mississippi, 170 U.S. 213 (1898).
164. Brownfield V. S. Carolina, 189 U.S. 426 (1903) (Holmes's first opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court).
165. Giles V. Harris, 189 U.S. 475 (1903).
166. Pete Daniel, The Shadow of Slavery (Urbana, 1972).
167. Daniel A. Novak, The Wheel of Servitude (Lexington, 1978).
168. Benno C. Schmidt, ‘Principle and Prejudice: The Supreme Court and Race in the Progressive Era. Part 2: The Peonage Cases’, 82 Columbia Law Review 646 (1982).
169. J. Morgan Kousser, The Shaping of Southern Politics, 1880–1910 (New Haven, 1974).
170. Sheldon Hackney, Populism to Progressivism in Alabama (Princeton, 1969).
171. C. Vann Woodward, The Strange Career of Jim Crow (New York, 2d rev. ed. 1966).
172. Lawlor V. Loewe (Danbury Hatters’ Case), 208 U.S. 274 (1908).
173. Adair V. United States, 208 U.S. 161 (1908).
174. Employers’ Liability Cases, 207 U.S. 463 (1908).
175. Bailey V. Alabama, 211 U.S. 452 (1908).
176. Ray Stannard Baker, ‘A Pawn in the Struggle for Freedom’, American Magazine 72 (1911) 608, 610.
177. Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219, 245 (1911).
178. Bailey V. Alabama, 219 U.S. at 248.
179. Benno C. Schmidt, ‘Principle and Prejudice’, supra note 86.
180. Bailey V. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219 (1911) at 245.
181. Benno C. Schmidt, ‘Principle and Prejudice’, supra note 86 at 691–702.
182. U.S. v. Reynolds, 235 U.S. at 146–147.
183. Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 (1915).
184. Butler V. Perry, 240 U.S. 328 (1916).
185. Kentucky V. Powers, 201 U.S. 1 (1906).
186. Selective Service Cases, 245 U.S. 366 (1918).
187. Marcus Browning Holding Co. v. Feldman, 256 U.S. 170 (1921) (New York).
188. Block v. Hirsch, 256 U.S. 135 (1921) (Washington, D.C.).
189. Samuel J. Konefsky, The Legacy of Holmes and Brandeis (New York, 1956).
190. Walton H. Hamilton, ‘On Dating Mr. Justice Holmes’, supra note 33 at 24.
191. Block V. Hirsch, 256 U.S. 135, 161–163 (1921).
192. Chasleton Corp. v. Sinclair, 264 U.S. 543 (1924).
193. Edward S. Corwin, The Twilight of the Supreme Court supra note 7.
194. Felix Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Holmes, and the Supreme Court supra note 12.
195. Morton Keller, Affairs of State, supra note 19 at 461–472.
196. Ernst Freund, Police Power (Chicago, 1904) 248.
197. Robert H. Wiebe, The Search for Order, supra note 7 at 169.
198. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations, 262 U.S. 522 (1923).
199. Wolff Packing Co. v. Industrial Court, 267 U.S. 552 (1925).
200. Felix Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Holmes and the Supreme Court supra note 12.
201. Ray A. Brown, ‘Due Process of Law, Police Power and the Supreme Court’, 40 Harvard Law Review 943 (1927).
202. Adkins V. Children's Hospital, 261 U.S. 525, 553 (1923).
203. Mackenzie V. Hare, 239 U.S. 299 (1915).
204. In Re Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116 (1894).
205. Bradwell V. State, 83 U.S.(16 Wall.) 130 (1872).
206. Brooks Adams, The Theory of Social Revolutions (New York, 1913) 218.
207. Coppage V. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1, 27 (1915).
208. The usual first citation for the proposition is Loan Association v. Topeka, 87 U.S. (20 Wall.) 655, 662–63 (1875).
209. Calder V. Bull, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 386, 388 (1798).
210. Richard L. Mccormick, ‘The Party Period and Public Policy: An Exploratory Hypothesis’, Journal of American History 66 (1979) 279.
211. Henry N. Scheiber, ‘Property Law, Expropriation, and Resource Allocation by Government: The United States, 1789–1910’, Journal of Economic History 33 (1973) 232.
212. Paul W. Gates, ‘An Overview of American Land Policy’, Agricultural History 50 (1976) 213.
213. Morton J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Cambridge 1977).
214. Oscar Handlin and Mary Flug Handlin, Commonwealth (New York, 1948).
215. Louis Hartz, Economic and Democratic Thought (Cambridge, 1948).
216. Richard Hofstadter, The Age of Reform, (New York, 1955) 243–244.
217. Karl N. Llewellyn, ‘The Constitution as an Institution’, 34 Columbia Law Review 1, 14 n.28 (1934).
218. Charles Warren, The Supreme Court in United States History, supra note 12 at ii: 751.
219. John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust (Cambridge, 1980) 112.