Regression facts and artifacts

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 411-414

  Reichardt, Charles S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038998890     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00030-6     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Campbell D.T. On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist. 30:1975;1103-1126.
2. Campbell D.T. Regression artifacts in time-series and longitudinal data. Evaluation and Program Planning. 19:1996;377-389.
3. Campbell D.T., Boruch R.F. Making the case for randomized assignment to treatments by considering the alternatives: six ways in which quasi-experimental evaluations in compensatory education tend to underestimate effects. Bennett C.A., Lumsdaine A.A. Evaluation and experiment: some critical issues in assessing social programs. 1975;Academic Press, New York.
4. Campbell D.T., Kenny D.A. A primer on regression artifacts. 1999;Guilford, New York.
5. Campbell D.T., Stanley J.C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. 1966;Rand McNally, Chicago.
6. Cochran W.G., Rubin D.B. Controlling bias in observational studies: a review. Sankhya (A). 35:1973;417-446.
7. Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. 1979;Rand McNally, Chicago.
8. Lord F.M. A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin. 68:1967;304-305.
9. Mark M.M. Validity typologies and the logic and practice of quasi-experimentation. Trochim W.M.K. Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 31. 1986;47-66 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
10. Mohr L.B. Regression artifacts and other customs of dubious desert. Evaluation and Program Planning. 23:(4):2000;397-409.
11. Reichardt C.S. The statistical analysis of data from nonequivalent group designs. Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Quasiexperimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. 1979;147-205 Rand McNally, Chicago.
12. Reichardt C.S. Reinterpreting Seaver's study of teacher expectancies as a regression artifact. Journal of Educational Psychology. 77:1985;231-236.
13. Reichardt C.S., Gollob H.F. Taking uncertainty into account when estimating effects. Mark M.M., Shotland R.L. Multiple methods for program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 35. 1987;7-22 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
14. Reichardt C.S., Mark M.M. Nonequivalent group designs. Smelser N.J., Baltes P.B. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. 2000;Elsevier, Oxford. (in press).
15. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D. Comment - design rules: more steps toward a complete theory of quasi-experimentation. Statistical Science. 14:1999;294-300.
16. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 185:1974;1124-1131.