Reconciling polarity: Toward a responsive model of evaluating literacy performance

Reading Teacher

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 578-587

  Hinchman, Kathleen A ^a   Michel, Pamela A ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038982978     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allington, R., & Li, S. (1990, December). Teacher beliefs about children who find learning to read difficult. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
2. Ball, E., & Blachman, B. (1991). Does phoneme segmentation training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49-66.
3. Clay, M.M. (1993). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Dahlgren, G., & Olsson, L. (1986, April). The child's conception of reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 268 497)
5. Davis, B., & Sumara, D.J. (1997). Cognition, complexity, and teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 105-125.
6. Denny, T.P., & Weintraub, S. (1963). Exploring first graders' concepts of reading. The Reading Teacher, 16, 363-365.
7. Denny, T.P., & Weintraub, S. (1966). First graders' responses to three questions about reading. Elementary School Journal, 66, 441-448.
8. Downing, J. (1969). How children think about reading. The Reading Teacher, 23, 217-230.
9. Downing, J. (1970). Children's concepts of language in learning to read. Educational Research, 12, 101-112.
10. Dressman, M. (1997). Preference as performance: Doing social class and gender in three school libraries. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 319-362.
11. Flippo, R.F. (1997). Reading assessment and instruction: A qualitative approach to diagnosis. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
12. Garcia, G., & Pearson, P.D. (1994). Assessment and diversity. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of educational research (Vol. 20, pp. 337-391). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13. Gillet, J.W., & Temple, C.A. (1994). Understanding reading problems: Assessment and instruction (4th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.
14. Glaser, R., & Silver, E. (1994). Assessment, testing, and instruction: Retrospect and prospect. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of educational research (Vol. 20, pp. 393-419). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
15. Goodman, Y. (1985). Kidwatching: Observing children in the classroom. In A. Jaggar & MT. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Observing the language learner (pp. 9-18). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16. Harris, A.J. (1977). The reading teacher as a diagnostician. In E.A. Earle (Ed.), Classroom practice in reading (pp. 21-26). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17. Harris, A.J., & Sipay, E.R. (1990). How to increase reading ability (9th ed.). New York: Longman.
18. Harste, J., Woodward, V.A., & Burke, C. (1984). Language stories and literacy lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19. Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hinchman, K.A. (1998). Reconstructing our understandings of adolescents' participation in classroom literacy events: Learning to look through other eyes. In D. Alvermann, K. Hinchman, S. Phelps, & D. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 173-192). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Johns, J. (1972). Children's concepts of reading and their reading achievement. Journal of Reading Behavior, 4, 56-57.
22. Johns, J. (1992). From traditional reading clinics to wellness centers (Literacy Research Report No. 16). DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
23. Johns, J., & Ellis, D. (1976). Reading: Children tell it like it is. Reading World, 16, 115-128.
24. Johnston, P.H. (1992). Constructive evaluation of literate activity. New York: Longman.
25. Johnston, P.H., & Allington, R.L. (1991). Remediation. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 984-1012). New York: Longman.
26. Lipson, M.Y., & Wixson, K.K. (1996). Assessment and instruction of reading and writing disability: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). New York: Scott, Foresman.
27. McCormick, S. (1987). Remedial and clinical reading instruction. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
28. McGill-Franzen, A. (1994). Compensatory and special education: Is there accountability for learning and belief in children's potential? In E.H. Hiebert & B.M. Taylor (Eds.), Getting reading right from the start: Effective early literacy interventions (pp. 13-35). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. McGill-Franzen, A., & James, I. (1990, December). Teacher beliefs about remedial and learning disabled readers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
30. Michel, P. (1994). The child's view of reading: Understandings for teachers and parents. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31. Oliver, M.E. (1975). The development of language concepts of preprimary Indian children. Language Arts, 52, 865-869.
32. Phelan, A. (1997). When the mirror cracked: The discourse of reflection in pre-service teacher education. In K. Watson (Ed.), Dilemmas in teaching and teacher education (pp. 169-178). London: Cassell.
33. Reid, J.F. (1966). Learning to think about reading. Educational Research, 9, 56-62.
34. Roller, C. (1996). Variability not disability: Struggling readers in a workshop classroom. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
35. Roskos, K., & Walker, B. (1993). Interactive handbook for understanding reading diagnosis: A problem-solving approach using case studies. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
36. Schwandt, T.A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R.J. (1996). Off track: When poor readers become learning disabled. Denver, CO: Westview Press.
38. Spivey, N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning. New York: Academic Press.
39. Swanson, B.B. (1985). Listening to students about reading. Reading Horizons, 22, 123-128.
40. Taylor, D. (1994). From a child's point of view. Ports-mouth, NH: Heinemann.
41. Tierney, RJ., Carter, M.A., &Desai, L.E. (1991). Portfolio assessment in the reading-writing classroom. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
42. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Walmsley, S.A., & Allington, R.L (1995). Redefining and refining instructional support programs for at - risk stu -dents. In R.L. Allington &S.A. Walmsley (Eds.), No quick fix: Re-thinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools (pp. 19-44). New York: Teachers College Press.
44. Wasik, B.A., & Slavin, R.E. (1993). Preventing early read-ing failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28,179 - 200.
45. Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., &Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student as-sessment. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of educational research (Vol. 17, pp. 31 - 75). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.