Impasse in Korea: A conventional arms-accord solution?

Survival

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 58-72

  Almeida, Pedro ^a   O’hanlon, Michael ^a,b  

^a Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs ^*  (United States)

^b BROOKINGS INSTITUTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038957774     PISSN: 00396338     EISSN: 14682699     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/survival/41.1.58     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Leon V. Sigal, Disarming Strangers (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998).
2. Michael J. Mazarr, ‘Korea: A Time to be Bold?’, National Interest, no. 54, Spring 1998, pp. 91-97;
3. Robert A. Manning, ‘Time Bomb’, New Republic, 30 November 1998, pp. 27-31;
4. Selig S. Harrison, ‘The Korean Showdown that Shouldn’t Happen’, Washington Post, 22 November 1998, p. C2;
5. Michael O’hanlon and Mike Mochizuki, ‘Progress Possible in Korea, With Push From US’, Christian Science Monitor, 30 December 1996.
6. James Laney and Jason T. Shaplen, ‘Engaging Pyongyang Is Route to Stability’, Los Angeles Times, 12 June 1998.
7. DIA, North Korea: The Foundations for Military Strength - Update 1995 (Washington DC: Defense Intelligence Agency, 1996), p. 13.
8. Michael O’hanlon, ‘Stopping a North Korean Invasion: Why Defending South Korea Is Easier than the Pentagon Thinks’, International Security, vol. 22, no. 4, Spring 1998, pp. 135-70.
9. Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense, Defense White Paper 1997-1998 (Seoul: Ministry of National Defense, 1998), pp. 43-56;
10. O’hanlon, O. ‘Stopping a North Korean Invasion’, pp. 141-43.
11. US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency (ACDA), World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers, 1996 (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1997), p. 39;
12. Public Affairs Office, US Forces Korea, ‘Backgrounder No. 21: Eighth US Army Assets’, July 1997.
13. Secretary of Defense Les Aspin, Report on the Bottom-Up Review (Washington DC: US Department of Defense, October 1993), p. 19;
14. Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Report on the Bottom-Up Review (Washington DC: US Department of Defense, May 1997), p. 24;
15. Don Oberdorfer, The Two Koreas (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997), p. 325.
16. Joshua M. Epstein, ‘Dynamic Analysis and the Conventional Balance in Europe’, International Security, vol. 12, no. 4, Spring 1988, p. 156.
17. O’hanlon, O. ‘Stopping a North Korean Invasion’, pp. 143-47;
18. Lane Pierrot, Structuring US Forces After the Cold War: Costs and Effects of Increased Reliance on the Reserves (Washington DC: Congressional Budget Office, 1992), pp. 46-53.
19. Nick Beldecos and Eric Heginbotham, ‘The Conventional Military Balance in Korea’, Breakthroughs, Spring 1995, p. 3.
20. Public Affairs Office, US Forces Korea, ‘Backgrounder No. 14: Illegal North Korean Tunnels in the DMZ’, January 1997.
21. Victor Utgoff, The Challenge of Chemical Weapons: An American Perspective (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991), pp. 148-88.
22. Frances Lussier, US Ground Forces and the Conventional Balance in Europe (Washington DC: Congressional Budget Office, June 1988), pp. 7-28, 91-99.
23. Stephen D. Biddle, David Gray, Stuart Kaufman, Dennis DeRiggi, and D. Sean Barnett, Defense at Low Force Levels: The Effect of Force to Space Ratios on Conventional Combat Dynamics, IDA Paper P-2380 (Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis, 1991), pp. 7-41;
24. Joshua M. Epstein, Conventional Force Reductions: A Dynamic Assessment (Washington DC: Brookings Institution, 1990), p. 58.
25. O’hanlon, O. ‘Stopping a North Korean Invasion’, pp. 155-59.
26. David A. Ochmanek, Edward R. Harshberger, David E. Thaler and Glenn A. Kent, To Find, and Not to Yield (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1998), pp. 27-28.
27. Barry D. Watts and Thomas A. Keaney, ‘Part II: Effects and Effectiveness’, in Eliot A. Cohen, Gulf War Air Power Survey, Volume II (Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1993), pp. 138, 149, 269, 281.
28. Thomas A. Keaney and Eliot A. Cohen, Gulf War Air Power Survey Summary Report (Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1993), p. 61.
29. US General Accounting Office, Operation Desert Storm: Evaluation of the Air Campaign, GAO/NSIAD-97-134, (June 1997), pp. 210-20.