Verbal aggressiveness and communicator style characteristics of summoned jurors as predictors of actual jury selection

Communication Monographs

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 266-275

  Wigley III, Charles J ^a  

^a CANISIUS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication style; Jury selection; Positive disclosiveness; Verbal aggressiveness

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038930635     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03637759909376477     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Abbott, W.F., Hall, F., & Linville, E. (1993). Jury research: a review and bibliography. Philadelphia: American Law Institute-American Bar Association Committee on Continuing Professional Education.
2. Chemerinsky, E. (1994). Supreme Court review: the end of gender-based peremptory challenges. Trial, 30(8), 69-73.
3. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
4. Infante, D.A., Riddle, B.L., Horvath, C.L., & Tumlin, S.A. (1992). Verbal aggressiveness: Messages and reasons. Communication Quarterly, 40, 116-126.
5. Infante, D.A., & Wigley, C.J., III (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: an interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53, 61-69.
6. Norton, R.W. (1978). Foundation of a communicator style construct. Human Communication Research, 4, 99-112.
7. Wheeless, L.R. (1978). A follow-up of the relationship among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4, 143-157.
8. Wigley, C.J., III (1986). Communication variables as predictors of decisions in the voir dire process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University (UMI 8705823).
9. Wigley, C.J., III (1995). Disclosiveness, willingness to communicate, and communication apprehension as predictors of jury selection in felony trials. Communication Quarterly, 43, 342-351.