Engaging new social movements

Human Relations

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1457-1476

  Hills, Dione ^a  

^a TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Engaged evaluation; New social movements; Stake holder evaluation; User involvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038929475     PISSN: 00187267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001872679805101203     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ARNSTEIM, S. R. A ladder of participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 55(4), 216-257.
2. BRACHT, N. (Ed.). Health promotion at the community level. London: Sage, 1990.
3. COHEN, J. Rethinking social movements. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 1983, 24, 97-113.
4. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Report by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation and Results of the HELIOS Programme (1988-1991), SEC (92) 1206 Final, Brussels, July 6, 1992.
5. DAUNT, P. Meeting disability: A European response. London: Cassell.
6. EDER, K. New social movement? Telos, 1982, 57, 11-20.
7. EPSTEIN, J. Public services: Working for the consumer. Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 1990.
8. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Resolution of the Council and the Representatives of Governments of the Member States of 20 December 1996 on Equality of Opportunity for People with Disabilities. July 30, 1996 (COM (96)406 final).
9. EYERMAN, R., & JAMISON, A. Social movements: A cognitive approach. Cambridge: Polity, 1991.
10. FETTERMAN, D. M., KAFTERIA, S. J., & WANDERSMIAN, G. (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation, knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
11. FINKELSTEIN. Attitudes and Disabled People. Issues for Discussion Paper given at World Health Organization Meetings. Netherlands, June 24-28, 1980.
12. FRIERE, P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Penguin, 1970.
13. GIDDENS, A. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
14. GUBER, E. G., & LINCOLN, Y. S. Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage Publications, 1993.
15. HABERMAS, G. Towards a rational society. London: Heinemann, 1971.
16. HABERMAS, G. The theory of communicative action. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
17. HAMBLETON, R. Consumerism, decentralisation and local democracy. Public Administration, Summer 1988, 66(2), 125-147.
18. HERON, J. In P. Reason and J. Rowan (Eds.), Human enquiry. New Paradigm Research, 1989.
19. HILLS, D. Carer support in the community. HMSO, 1991.
20. HILLS, D., et al. Look After Your Heart: Community Approaches to Health Education. Final report to HEA, 1995.
21. HILLS, D., & STERN, E. The Evaluation of the Helios II Program. Final report to the European Commission, 1997.
22. LOVELOCK, R., & POWELL, L. J., with Stack, E. Evaluation of U.K. Participation in the Helios Program. Final Report, CEDR, University of Southampton, Southampton, 1993.
23. MELLUCCI, A. The new social movements: A theoretical approach. Social Science Information, 1980, 19(2), 199-226.
24. MELLUCCI, A. Social movements and the democratisation of everyday life. In J. Keans (Ed.), Civil society and the state. London: Verso, 1988.
25. MILLER, E. The politics of involvement. In A. D. Colman and M. H. Geller (Eds.), Group relations reader (Vol. 2). Washington: A. K. Rice Institute, 1995.
26. MILLER, E. et al. Effective support for self-help: Some lessons from the experience of the Self Help Alliance. In R. Jack (Ed.), Empowerment in community care. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995.
27. NHS EXECUTIVE. Patient Partnership: Building a Collaborative Strategy, 1996.
28. OFFE, C. Changing boundaries of institutional politics: Social movements since the 1960s. In C. S. Maier (Ed.), Changing boundaries of the political. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
29. OLIVER, M. The politics of disablement. Macmillan, 1990.
30. PARSONS, T. Action theory and the human condition. New York: Free Press, 1978.
31. POLLITT, C. (Ed.). Consumerinsm and beyond (theme issue). Public Administration, Summer 1988, 166(2).
32. SCOTT, A. Ideology and the new social movements. London: Unwin Hyrnan, 1990.
33. SHEMMINGS, D., & SHEMMINGS, Y. Defining participative practice in health and welfare. In R. Jack (Ed.). Empowerment in community care. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995.
34. SMELSNER, N. Theories of collective behaviour. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.
35. STERN, E. National Programmes in Support of Local Initiatives. Paper produced for the OECD, Tavistock Institute, 1992.
36. STERN, E. The Work of the Evaluation Development and Review Unit (EDRU). Tavistock Institute Annual Review 1995/1996.
37. STERN, E., et al. Final Report on the Evaluation of London Lighthouse, 1996.
38. STRYDOM, P. Habermas and new social movements. Telos, 1990, 55, 156-164.
39. STRYDOM, P. Environmental assessment sub report: The sociocultural dimension. ARTICULATE deliverable WA3.2, 1992.
40. TOURAINE, A. The post industrial society. New York: Random House, 1971.
41. TOURAINE, A. Reconceiving Social Movements. Social Problems, 1978, 26, 38-49.
42. TOURING, A. The voice and the eye, an analysis of social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
43. VANDERPLAAT, M. Beyond technique: Issues in evaluating for empowerment. Evaluation, July 1995, I(I).
44. WEBSTER, F. E. Rediscovering the marketing concept. Business Horizons, May/June 1988, 31, 29-39.
45. DIONE HILLS, after some years as a researcher with the Department of Health, joined The Tavistock Institute 12 years ago, and since then has been involved in a wide range of evaluation studies relating to the delivery of services in the health and welfare sectors. As part of the Institute's Evaluation Development and Review Unit (EDRU), she has been involved in evaluating programs and services in fields in which service users form an increasingly articulate pressure group, the most recent of which was a European program for disabled people. In this context, she has become increasingly interested in the implications of this work, both for the process of evaluation, for the research team, and for the researchers themselves.