AUSI expected utility: An anticipated utility theory of relative disappointment aversion

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 277-290

  Grant, Simon ^a   Kajii, Atsushi ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Allais paradox; D81; Disappointment aversion; Rank dependent expected utility

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038913358     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00094-8     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aczél, J., 1987. A short course on functional equations. Dordrecht, Reidel.
2. Allais, M., 1988. The general theory of random choices in relation to the invariant cardinal utility function and the specific probability function. In: B. Munier (Ed) Risk, Decision and Rationality. Dordrecht, Reidel.
3. Camerer C. An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 2:1989;61-104.
4. Carbone, E., Hey, J., 1994. An investigation into the determination of the error: A comparison of estimates of EU and non-EU preference functionals arising from pairwise choice experiments and complete ranking experiments. Mimeo, University of York.
5. Chateauneuf, A., 1990. On the use of comonotonicity in the axiomatization of EURDP theory for arbitrary consequences. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decision Theories, Duke University, North Carolina.
6. Chew S.H., Epstein L.G., Wakker P.P. A unifying approach to axiomatic non-expected utility theories: Correction and comment. Journal of Economic Theory. 59:1993;183-188.
7. Chew S.H., Karni E., Safra Z. Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank-dependent probabilities. Journal of Economic Theory. 42:1987;370-381.
8. Diamond P., Stiglitz J. Increases in risk and in risk aversion. Journal of Economic Theory. 8:1974;337-360.
9. Epstein Chew S.H., Epstein L.G. A unifying approach to axiomatic non-expected utility theories. Journal of Economic Theory. 49:1989;207-240.
10. Feder G. The impact of uncertainty in a class of objective functions. Journal of Economic Theory. 16:1977;304-318.
11. Grant, S., Kajii, A., 1994. AUSI expected utility: An anticpated utility theory of relative disappointment aversion. CORE Discussion Paper No. 9445.
12. Green, J., Jullien, B., 1988. Ordinal independence in nonlinear utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 355-388. ('Erratum' 2 (1989): 119).
13. Gul F. A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica. 59:1991;667-686.
14. Hey J.D., Orme C. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica. 62:1995;1291-1326.
15. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 47:1979;263-291.
16. Karni E., Safra Z. 'Preference reversal' and the observability of preferences by experimental methods. Econometrica. 55:1987;675-685.
17. Loomes G. Evidence of a new violation of the independence axiom. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 3:1991;91-108.
18. Luce R.D., Fishburn P.C. Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 4:1991;29-59.
19. Puppe C. Preference functionals with prize-dependent distortions of probabilities. Economic Letters. 33:1990;127-131.
20. Puppe, C., 1991. Distorted Probabilities and Choice Under Risk. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems #363.
21. Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organizations. 3:1982;323-343.
22. Quiggin J. On the optimal design of lotteries. Economica. 58:1991;1-16.
23. Quiggin, J., 1993. Generalized expected utility theory: the rank-dependent model. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
24. Quiggin J. Economic choice in generalized expected utility theory AU. Theory and Decision. 38(2):1995;153-171.
25. Royden, H.L., 1988. Real analysis. MacMillan, New York.
26. Rubinstein A. Similarity and decision making under risk (Is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox?). Journal of Economic Theory. 46:1988;145-153.
27. Segal U. Some remarks on Quiggin's anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organnizations. 8:1987;145-154.
28. Segal U. Anticipated utility: A measure representation approach. Annals of Operations Research. 19:1989;359-373.
29. Segal U. Two stage lotteries without the reduction axiom. Econometrica. 58:1990;349-378.
30. Segal U. The measure representation: A correction. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 6:1993;99-107.
31. Starmer C. Testing new theories of choice under uncertainty using the common consequence effect. Review of Economic Studies. 59:1992;813-830.
32. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 5:1992;297-323.
33. Wakker P.P. Counter examples to Segal's measure representation theorem. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 6:1993;91-98.
34. Wakker P.P. Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory and Decision. 36:1994;1-44.
35. Wu G. An empirical test of ordinal independence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 9:1994;39-60.
36. Yaari M.E. The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica. 55:1987;95-115.