The housing value-relevance of governmental accounting information

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 91-118

  Lin, Wenshan ^a   Raman, K K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038909955     PISSN: 02784254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4254(98)10004-2     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Anglin P., Arnott R. Residential real estate brokerage as a principal agent problem. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 4(2):1991;99-126.
2. Anthony, R., 1989. Should Business and Nonbusiness Accounting be Different? Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
3. Bell, M., Bowman, J., 1991. Property taxes. In: Petersen, J., Strachota, D. (Eds.), Local Government Finance: Concepts And Practices. Government Finance Officers Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 85-112.
4. Belsley, D., Kuh, E., Welsch, R., 1980. Regression Diagnostics. Wiley, New York.
5. Berne, R., 1992. The relationships between financial reporting and the measurement of financial condition. Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT.
6. Blomquist G., Worley L. Hedonic prices, demands for urban housing amenities and benefit estimates. Journal of Urban Economics. 9(2):1981;212-221.
7. Case K., Shiller R. The efficiency of the market for single-family homes. The American Economic Review. 79(1):1989;125-137.
8. Clark, T., 1990. Monitoring Local Governments, Kendall Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, IA.
9. Clark T. Municipal fiscal strain: indicators and causes. Government Finance Review. 10(3):1994;27-29.
10. Copeland, R., Ingram, R., 1983. Municipal Financial Reporting and Disclosure Quality. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
11. Crone, T., March/April 1995. Making money in the housing market: Is there a sure-fire system? Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, 19-31.
12. Dye, R., 1990. American Federalism. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
13. Edmonds R. Travel time valuation through hedonic regression. Southern Economic Journal. 50(1):1983;83-98.
14. Edmonds R. A theoretical basis for hedonic regression: a research primer. American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association (AREUEA) Journal. 12(1):1984;72-85.
15. Esser J. Measuring performance: accountability is not synonymous with accounting. Government Finance Review. 9(6):1993;3.
16. Esser J. GFOA and the GASB reporting model. Government Finance Review. 13(3):1997;3.
17. Freeman A. Hedonic prices, property values and measuring environmental benefits: a survey of the issues. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 81(2):1979;154-173.
18. Gau G. Efficient real estate markets: paradox or paradigm. American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association (AREUEA) Journal. 15(2):1987;1-12.
19. Gatzlaff D., Tirtiroglu D. Real estate market efficiency: issues and evidence. Journal of Real Estate Literature. 3(2):1995;157-189.
20. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), 1985. Discussion memorandum. Measurement focus and basis of accounting - governmental funds. Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Stamford, CT.
21. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), 1987. Concepts statement no. 1. Objectives of financial reporting. Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Stamford, CT.
22. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), 1994. Concepts statement no. 2. Service efforts and accomplishments reporting. Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT.
23. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), 1995. Preliminary views, Governmental financial reporting model: core financial statements. Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT.
24. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), 1997. Exposure draft. Proposed financial statements - and management's discussion and analysis - for state and local governments. Governmental Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT.
25. Greer, G., Farrell, M., 1992. Investment analysis for real estate decisions. Longman Financial Services Publishing, New York.
26. Gujarati, D., 1995. Basic Econometrics, 3rd ed. McGraw Hill, New York.
27. Guntermann K., Smith R. Efficiency of the market for residential real estate. Land Economics. 63(1):1987;34-45.
28. Hanushek E. The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature. 24(3):1986;1141-1177.
29. Hanushek E. The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher. 18(4):1989;45-62.
30. Harrison D., Rubinfeld D. Hedonic housing prices and the demand for clean air. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 9(1):1978;81-102.
31. Hassan K. Real estate in the theory of finance. The Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst. 56(1):1990;60-67.
32. Hausman J. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica. 46(6):1978;1251-1271.
33. Hirschman, A., 1970. Exit Voice and Loyalty. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Johansson, P., 1987. The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Judge, G., Griffiths, W., Hill, R., Lutkepohl, H., and Lee, T., 1982. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. Wiley, New York.
36. Kennedy, P., 1992. A Guide to Econometrics, 3rd ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Lev B. Toward a theory of equitable and efficient accounting policy. The Accounting Review. 63(1):1988;1-22.
38. Linneman P. Some empirical results on the nature of the hedonic price function for the urban housing market. Journal of Urban Economics. 8(1):1980;47-68.
39. Linneman, P., 1982. Hedonic prices and residential location. In: Diamond, D., Tolley, G. (Eds.), The Economics of Urban Amenities, Academic Press, New York, pp. 69-88.
40. Linneman P. An empirical test of the efficiency of the housing market. Journal of Urban Economics. 20(2):1986;140-154.
41. Mandel, K., Dec. 4, 1995. Why all that market wealth won't stoke consumer spending. Business Week, p. 95.
42. Mantrala S., Zabel E. The housing market and real estate brokers. Real Estate Economics. 23(2):1995;161-185.
43. Marks B., Raman K. The behavior of interperiod equity-related performance measures over time. Accounting Horizons. 10(4):1996;52-66.
44. Mikesell, J., 1993. City Finances, City Futures. National League of Cities Publications Center, Annapolis, MD.
45. Miller G. Are there too many governments in the tenth district? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review. 78(2):1993;67-77.
46. Miller, J., October 1995. KPMG critiques GASB reporting model. KPMG Peat Marwick Government Services Newsletter, pp. 1-2.
47. Nelson J. Residential choice, hedonic prices and the demand for urban air quality. Journal of Urban Economics. 5(3):1978;357-369.
48. Oates, W., 1988. On the nature and measurement of fiscal illusion: a survey. In: G. Brennan (Ed.), Taxation and Fiscal Federalism. Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp. 65-82.
49. Pindyck, R., and Rubinfield, D., 1991. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 3rd ed. McGraw Hill, New York.
50. Pyhrr, S., Cooper. J., Wofford, L., Kapplin, S., and Lapides, P., 1989. Real Estate Investment: Strategy, Analysis, Decisions. Wiley, New York.
51. Rafuse, R., 1991. Financing Local Government. In: Petersen, J., Strachota, D. (Eds.), Local Government Finance: Concepts and Practices. Government Finance Officers Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 9-28.
52. Raman K. The balanced budget and interperiod equity: implications for financial reporting. Public Fund Digest. 8(2):1997;37-54.
53. Rayburn, W., Devaney, M., and Evans, R., 1987. A test of weak-form efficiency in residential real estate returns. American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association (AREUEA) Journal 15 (3), 220-233.
54. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy. 82(1):1974;34-55.
55. Schipper K. Academic accounting research and the standard setting process. Accounting Horizons. 8(4):1994;61-73.
56. Tiebout C. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy. 65(5):1956;416-424.
57. US Bureau of the Census, 1991. Statistical abstract of the United States. US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
58. US Bureau of the Census, 1992. Census of Housing and Population. US Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC.
59. Walden M. Magnet schools and the differential impact of school quality on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Research. 5(2):1990;221-223.
60. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 48(4):1980;817-838.